Solid Earth Geophysics
 


  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  

Continental moho and serpentinization of the forearc (Presenter:Abdulaziz.muhaidib)

March 12 2005 at 2:23 AM
No score for this post

  (Login DEPREM)
Forum Owner

 

2EOS Home PageUBC Main Site

image

Michael Bostock
Professor

Office:

EOS-East 220

Phone:

604-822-2082

E-mail: 

Mail-Me

Teaching

Fall 2004

Spring 2005

Other

EOSC 110

EOSC 110

 

EOSC 354

EOSC 561

 

Personal Website: http://www.geop.ubc.ca/~bostock

Profile

M.App.Sc. (1988) Queen`s University;
Ph.D. (1991) Australian National University;
Postdoctoral Fellow, Utrecht (1991-1993);
Faculty Member, UBC (since 1993).

Research Interests

My research over the past few years has been directed toward two important issues in Solid Earth Science: i) the structure and dynamics of subduction zones; and ii) the formation and evolution of the first continental landmasses. I have addressed these topics using the tools of seismology, and have invested considerable effort in the development of theoretical procedures to maximize the information extracted from seismograms.

Subduction zones are the most dynamic regions of the planet as sites of tectonic plate consumption/modification and destructive natural disasters. I am particularly interested in understanding the controls that structure of the downgoing plate and mantle wedge exert on Wadati-Benioff earthquakes (such as the recent Magnitude 6.7 February 2001 Seattle event) and the sources of magma that feed volcanoes such as Mount Baker. Through the application of formal inverse scattering theory to body-wave seismograms, former student Stephane Rondenay (presently assistant, tenure-track professor at Massachusetts Institute of Technology) and I have identified aberrant structure in the forearc mantle wedge of the Cascadia subduction zone beneath Oregon and southern British Columbia. This work, summarized in a recent Nature article, indicates that the shallow forearc mantle is highly hydrated, a result with important implications for our understanding of the rupture limits and magnitude of great thrust earthquakes, the evolution of continental margins, and the genesis of arc magmas. Our results are, moreover, leading to a new appreciation of water transport within the Earth and the role of the mantle as a significant reservoir in the global hydrologic cycle.

The origin of Earth's earliest continents is a long-standing issue of controversy in Earth Science. A direct association between diamond fields (such as those in Canada's north) and the oldest continental edifices (or ``cratons'') renders the issue more than simply academic. In work that has received considerable financial and logistical support from Canada's nascent diamond industry, I have used seismology to probe the deep (200+km) roots of continents beneath the Slave craton in the Northwest Territories, site of the oldest dated rocks on Earth. My analysis reveals a well defined, anisotropic layering that bears striking resemblance to the signatures of oceanic crust in modern convergent margins. These results, also presented in the journal Nature, provide the critical and direct evidence supporting the thesis that ancient continental masses were stabilized through processes involving low-angle imbrication of oceanic lithosphere during multiple episodes of shallow subduction. In addition to identifying the carbon source for diamond genesis, our analysis has also suggested the presence of neutrally buoyant fluids at great depths (350-400 km) below the continental roots. These fluids may play a role in the genesis of the kimberlite magmas that transport abyssal diamonds to the Earth's surface.

Our success in these studies has raised a host of new scientific questions and technological challenges, that motivated my initiation of the POLARIS (Portable Observatories for Lithospheric Analysis and Research Investigating Seismicity) project. POLARIS represents a consortium of geophysicsts from Canadian universities that coordinates a $10M instrumentation facility funded by the Canada Foundation for Innovation, British Columbia and Ontario governments, U.B.C, the Canadian diamond industry and power generation utilities. I am one of three principal investigators in the project which currently involves major geophysical experiments in southern British Columbia, northern Canada (Northwest Territories and Hudson Bay regions) and southern Ontario.

Selected Publications

Last Updated: November,2004 Email EOS Webmaster at Mail-Me
Copyright © 2004 Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences,
University of British Columbia. Valid HTML 4.01!

 



    
This message has been edited by DEPREM on Mar 12, 2005 2:38 AM
This message has been edited by DEPREM on Mar 12, 2005 2:37 AM
This message has been edited by DEPREM on Mar 12, 2005 2:31 AM


 
Scoring_Disabled_MsgRespond to this message   
AuthorReply


(Login DEPREM)
Forum Owner

Questions

No score for this post
March 12 2005, 2:25 AM 

Q#1: What the stable mineral assemblage depend on?

 

A#1: It depend on temperature, pressure and bulk composition.

 

 

 

Q#2: What is the main serpentine mineral in ultramafic rocks metamorphosed under moderate temperature, and when it stable?

 

A#2: Antigorite is the main serpentine mineral in ultramafic rocks metamorphosed under moderate temperature, and it stable to temperatures of 620-720¢ªC at depths between 30 and 150 km.

 

 

 

Q#3: What is the temperatures of Moho beneath the arc and backarc of mantle?

 

A#3: Moho temperatures beneath the arc and backarc of mantle are significantly higher, above 800¢ªC.


 
Scoring_Disabled_MsgRespond to this message   


(Login DEPREM)
Forum Owner

Inverted Moho (paper presentation discusion)

No score for this post
March 12 2005, 2:27 AM 

An inverted continental Moho and serpentinization of the forearc mantle

 

Abstract

 

As oceanic lithosphere is subducted underneath a continental lithosphere material is transported creating a complex system. Understand that system if a difficult endeavor due to the multifaceted arrangement. The paper tries to shed some light on the mechanism taking place at the wedge of the subduction zone, forearc mantle in particular. They used scattered telesiemic waves recorded to map the forearc area as well as the backarc area. The findings is that that forearc mantle hydrated which creates serpentization. Serpentization in effect controls the down dip break limit of earthquakes at that region.

 

 

Q.1) what is the relationship between hydrated material and stress?

Small amount of water has the effect of lowering stress. Hence, material with small amount of water has low stress factor which causes the weakening of a particular layer.

 

Q.2) is the heat factor has the same effect as hydration?

The cooling of the forearc mantle makes it more susceptible to larger earthquakes. The harder the formation the more stress stored in it. The combination of low heat and small amount of water has a contradictory effect. In part coolong strengthen the layer yet water makes it week

 

Q.3) is it possible to meaure the amount of serpeintization?

It is possible using shear wave velocities and compensating for the error. Since serpenitization is associated with hydration, s-wave is a good method of measuring the percentage of serpentinization due to low s-wave velocities.


 
Scoring_Disabled_MsgRespond to this message   

(no login)

Questions for weekly presentation

No score for this post
March 12 2005, 5:48 AM 

Q.1 Where will you find abundant peridodite in earth's interior and what is its composition?

Ans. Peridodite is the dominant mantle rock comprising olivine, orthopyroxene and lesser amounts of clinopyroxenes.

Q.2 What happens to the acqueous fluid present in the downgoing slab and sediments as they encounter increasing temperatures and pressure?

The significant quantities of acqueous fluids are expelled from them.

Q.3 What is antigorite?

Antigorite is the main serpentine mineral in ultramafic rocks metamorphosed under moderate temperatures, and is stable to temperatures of 620-720 degree centigrade.

Q.4 On which factor , the degree of serpentization will depend?

The amount of water

Q.5 what is the difference between forearc temperatures in cold subduction zones and in oceanic subduction zones?

In cold subduction zones, forearc temperatures are lower,while in oceanic subduction zones these are high.

 
Scoring_Disabled_MsgRespond to this message   


(Login DEPREM)
Forum Owner

Questions by Busfar

No score for this post
March 14 2005, 3:31 AM 

Q:1)
We know that gravity plays a significant role in “pulling” the subsiding oceanic lithosphere which results in the formation of mountain ranges. Could the relatively high buoyancy of Serpentine play a role in “pushing” the continental lithosphere above and thus aid in the formation of the second set of mountain ranges which form parallel to the shoreline but further away from the subduction zone?

A:1)
I believe that buoyancy does play a role in the formation of the mountain ranges that we observe away from the subduction zone and above the serpentinized mantle forearc.

Q:2)
Why does the subsiding oceanic crust changes its dip from about 10 to about 30 degrees at about 40 km depth?

A:2)
The increasing pressure and temperature conditions causes the dehydration of the subsiding oceanic lithosphere, which as the authors of this paper suggest, results in the generation of the serpentinized mantle forearc above the subsiding oceanic lithosphere. I believe that the expulsion of water and volatiles from the pores of the subsiding oceanic lithosphere increases its density and thus causes the angle of subsidence to increase from about 10 degrees to about 30 degrees.

Q:3) What happens to the subsiding oceanic lithosphere at greater depths? Does it reach a point where its density contrast with the mantle is large and thus causes it to flow horizontally above the mantle? Or does it gain the properties of the mantle and thus just becomes part of the mantle?

A:3) I believe that the high temperature and pressure conditions at greater depths changes the physical and/or chemical conditions of the subsiding oceanic lithosphere and causes it to change to the same material as the mantle. This might be the reason that the effect of the subsiding oceanic lithosphere diminishes (can not be observed by current means) after certain depths.



 
Scoring_Disabled_MsgRespond to this message   
Current Topic - Continental moho and serpentinization of the forearc (Presenter:Abdulaziz.muhaidib)
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  
Find more forums on Alumni GroupsCreate your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2009 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement  
Solid Earth Geophysics