Solid Earth Geophysics
 


  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  

Structure and Evolution of the Lithosphere, presented by Jubran Akram

April 21 2005 at 6:13 AM
No score for this post

  (Login DEPREM)
Forum Owner

 
 Structure and Evolution of the Lithosphere Beneath the Rocky Mountains: Initial Results from the CD-ROM Experiment


 
Scoring_Disabled_MsgRespond to this message   
AuthorReply


(Login DEPREM)
Forum Owner

Respond by Jubran on Busfar's Questions

No score for this post
April 21 2005, 6:14 AM 

Sending the answers to Busfar questions on my presentation.
 
Q:1)
Figure 2 shows a large lateral velocity variation in the upper mantle. The
author suggests that these differences could be a reflection of the
temperature variation within the asthenosphere. Could there be other factors
that contribute to the velocity variation within the asthenosphere?

A:1)
I tend to believe that lateral variation in density, which could be caused
by physical compression or simply chemical change of the mantle’s content,
would contribute to the variation of P-wave velocity.
 
My Response
 
What I think, that these chemical changes also come from temperature variation like when oceanic (basaltic) crust tend to subduct beneath some oceanic / continental crust down to mantle, due to temperature and pressure, it goes under metamorphism and changes to high density eclogite. So these density variations in these depths are also because of temperature variations.
 
Q:2)
The article suggests that western North America (e.g., from the Canadian
shield to the Pacific plate margin) contains the largest mantle-velocity
gradient on Earth. If this is true, what do you think causes this
phenomenon?

A:2)
This is most likely, or at least largely, due to the nature of the
geological setting in the Rocky Mountains area where there is a dramatic
change in the lithosphere density going from fast, cratonic, cold, and dense
lithosphere mainly on the east to slow, orogenic, hotter, and less dense
lithosphere mainly on the west. This abrupt change in the nature of the
lithosphere over a relatively (relative to other parts of the world) short
distance causes this unique situation where the lithosphere’s velocity
varies dramatically.
My Response
 
I agree
 
Q:3)
What do you think is the origin of the high velocity lower crustal layer?

A:3)
It could be due to the intrusion of other high density materials during the
Proterozoic Eon. Other possibilities include that it had a more complex
origin than currently assumed, or concentration of refractory residues of
partial melting.
 
My Response

I agree


 
Scoring_Disabled_MsgRespond to this message   
Osman Elhussien
(no login)

Questions

No score for this post
April 24 2005, 4:34 AM 

Question #1:

Why authors selected North America for such study?

Answer:

Because it contains one of the thickest mantle on the planet, and western North America (e.g., from the Canadian shield to the Pacific plate margin) contains the largest mantle velocity gradient on Earth. In addition, Gradation from fast to slow upper mantle velocity structure occurs over a remarkably short distance in the Rocky Mountains.

Question #2:

How the Proterozoic lithosphere of Colorado and New Mexico differs from lithosphere beneath the Archean core of the continent?

Answer:

1. In thickness.
2. The strongly segmented nature.
3. Long term fertility for magnetism.
4. Its relative weakness.

Question #3:

How Moho layer formed at Rocky Mountains as per the authors' point of view?

Answer:

It has formed diachronously and by combination of processes including original arc development and subsequent magmatic underplating and to be the product of progressive evolution of the lithosphere.


 
Scoring_Disabled_MsgRespond to this message   

(no login)

Respond to Osman's Questions

No score for this post
April 25 2005, 6:48 AM 

I have viewed the questions and I agree to all of them.

 
Scoring_Disabled_MsgRespond to this message   


(Login DEPREM)
Forum Owner

Bulaihed's questions/responds reviewed by presenter

No score for this post
May 2 2005, 11:21 PM 

Here are my reponse to your questions 

 

 

Q#1: What the combined geophysical and geologic data from the CD-ROM experiment provide?

 

A#1: They are providing a high-resolution, multiscale image of the lithosphere of the Rocky Mountain region.

 

My Response------- Agree

 

Q#2: What the integrated data set for the Cheyenne belt, the Farwell-Lester Mountain zone, and the Jemez lineament, and their corresponding velocity anomalies in the mantle (to >200 km) indicates ?

 

A#2: They are controlled by Paleoproterozoic subduction zones that were active during collisions of juvenile terranes.

 

My Response-------Agree

 

Q#3: What are the Two provocative and testable hypotheses concerning lithospheric evolution?

 

A#3: (1) the lithospheric mantle in the southern Rocky Mountains preserves old subduction structures, is thick (>200 km) and has been persistently weak, and (2) the lowermost crust is a record of progressive evolution of the lithosphere and has grown through several underplating and/or intrusive events.

 

My Response-------Agree

 


 
Scoring_Disabled_MsgRespond to this message   
Current Topic - Structure and Evolution of the Lithosphere, presented by Jubran Akram
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  
Find more forums on Alumni GroupsCreate your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2009 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement  
Solid Earth Geophysics