<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  

Facts of the excellent movie "Intimacy"

December 4 2004 at 1:52 PM
Elisabeta  (no login)
from IP address 81.83.172.42

 
Chéreau originally approached Gary Oldman for the role of Jay. Oldman turned the part down because of the sex scenes, but he introduced the director to potential locations in the Old Kent Road area of southeast London.

http://www.channel4.com/film/reviews/film_fact.jsp?id=104635
---------------

My opinion about this :

Gary remains a gentleman until the end !
I can understand perfectly that he refused the part for this fantastic film, but deep inside I regret in a way. I simply loved this movie and would have loved to see him play in it alongside the other superb actors.

Elisabeta

 
 Respond to this message   
AuthorReply
Lucy
(no login)
63.226.190.249

Re: Facts of the excellent movie "Intimacy"

December 4 2004, 8:37 PM 

How is that sex scene any different from the one in The Scarlet Letter? (I also haven't seen "Intimacy") Well anyways I respect his decision, a true gentleman.

My ancestors are from Kent England! YAY

 
 Respond to this message   
Elisabeta
(no login)
81.83.172.42

completely different

December 5 2004, 1:02 AM 

Hey Luce,

Well the movie has close-up sex scenes. It is very well filmed and (godthanks) WITHOUT music. You can not, ever, compare it with the Scarlet letter. Regarding the 'gentleman', I was refering to the fact that he helped the director in SouthEastSightSeeing his eX-neighbourhood (so far says the article)
I recommend you this one, it's really good.

xxx
Elisabeta

 
 Respond to this message   
Spamlet
(no login)
24.236.73.184

Re: completely different

December 5 2004, 7:05 PM 

Yes, the sex in "Intimacy" was not simulated. Rather (as in the recent, controversial "Brown Bunny") the actors (Kerry Fox and Mark Rylance of all people) are actually having sex with each other on-screen.

 
 Respond to this message   
Elisabeta
(no login)
81.83.172.42

no penetration

December 5 2004, 8:13 PM 

There is no penetration, only Kerry performing (just a little bit) fellatio on Mark, but because of this fellatio you might think he is penetrating her too, but that is not true.

 
 Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.236.73.184

Re: no penetration

December 8 2004, 12:05 AM 

Erm...I'm pretty sure, legally at least, "fellatio" constitutes "penetration". As much as Clinton may've wished it otherwise.

 
 Respond to this message   
Elisabeta
(no login)
81.83.172.42

why you remain anonymous???

December 9 2004, 6:59 PM 

I like to talk to somebody with a name or etikette or prescription or whatever.
I like Clinton so I don't know what you are refering at...

 
 Respond to this message   
Lucy
(no login)
63.224.2.163

Re: why you remain anonymous???

December 10 2004, 12:01 AM 

Spamlet is refering to the Monica Lewinski scandal.

 
 Respond to this message   
Elisabeta
(no login)
81.83.172.42

Re: why you remain anonymous???

December 10 2004, 1:55 PM 

Oh yeah, Monica L. I almost forgot about her and that extremely stupid scandal.


 
 Respond to this message   
Spamlet
(no login)
24.236.73.184

Re: why you remain anonymous???

December 10 2004, 11:30 PM 

Sorry, I forgot to put my name on that post. I liked Clinton too and voted for him both times so it wasn't a criticism of him, but rather of the law itself.

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
4.16.23.19

Re: no penetration

December 12 2004, 1:27 AM 

You mean it constitutes "sexual relations." (or was that just a joke?)


 
 Respond to this message   
Kat
(no login)
172.172.162.94

I voted for him both times too! STILL dont care who he boffs...

December 12 2004, 3:41 AM 

as long as they are of age and it is consentual!
I'd rather see one real sex sceen than all that casual war,violence and cruelty.
Sex good.
Violence, war and cruelty bad.
Buffy fans will understand the reference!

Voted for Kerry against my will, but then the republican secretary of state futzed with the voter registration so badly, I'm sure along with his coconspiritors in other states they made yet another election moot.
But the Dems got what they deserved by laying down with the Reps to keep the third party candidates out,(most notably Ralph Nader).
What they did was essentially immoral and illegal, did he really think he could then trust the Reps not to screw him and his? What comes around goes around! Duh...and he calls Dubya stupid,Jesus!
Somethin is seriously reeking here in the good ole US of A!
Make Love not war!
Make democracy, not corporate facist theocratic dictatorships!
Your humble servant,
Kat

 
 Respond to this message   
Current Topic - Facts of the excellent movie "Intimacy"
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  
Find more forums on CelebritiesCreate your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2009 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement