<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>RETURN TO INDEX  

Environmental News Service: "Pharmaceuticals Again Found in U.S. Drinking Water"

March 12 2008 at 1:52 PM
M. Schaus  (Login MagillaSchaus)
ESA - GREAT LAKES DISTRICT CO-DIRECTOR
from IP address 72.88.44.212

Pharmaceuticals Again Found in U.S. Drinking Water
WASHINGTON, DC, March 10, 2008 (ENS) - Drugs taken for pain, infection, high cholesterol, asthma, epilepsy, mental illness and heart problems contaminate drinking water supplies of at least 41 million Americans, according to a report by the Associated Press National Investigation Team released today. These findings confirm a 2002 report by the U.S. Geological Survey that was the first nationwide study of pharmaceutical pollution in the nation's rivers and streams.

Drug residues contaminate drinking water supplies when people take pills. While their bodies absorb some of the medication, the rest is flushed down the toilet.

Drinking water treatment plants are not designed to remove these pharmaceutical residues, and the AP team uncovered data showing these same chemicals in treated tap water and water supplies in 24 major metropolitan areas.

All of the pharmaceuticals reported in drinking water supplies are unregulated in treated tap water. Although the concentrations of drugs found by the AP research were miniscule, measured in parts per billion, any level is legal and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA, does not require water utilities to test for these substances.


Tap water can contain drugs and other contaminants. (Photo by Greg Riegler)
Previous research has shown that exposure to levels even lower than reported in this survey can cause harm to aquatic species. Effects on humans, if any, have not been determined.

The USGS survey revealed a list of compounds including the painkillers acetaminophen and ibuprofen, prescription medicines for cardiac disorders and hypertension, and female sex hormones used in birth control pills and hormone replacement therapy.

The AP study surfaced as a campaign to get consumers to use tap water instead of bottled water is being waged across the country by the nonprofit group Food & Water Watch.

"All our water sources - rivers and reservoirs, springs and aquifers - may contain drugs flushed down our toilets and off factory farms somewhere up stream," said Food & Water Watch Executive Director Wenona Hauter. "But scaring people away from their taps into the bottled water isle at the grocery store will cost them thousands of dollars a year without making them any safer."

"Nearly 40 percent of bottled water is simply repackaged tap water. What's more, there's no government agency testing bottled water contamination from known hazards such as bacteria, synthetic contaminants, or heavy metals," Hauter said.

"While the Associated Press did not test bottled water, earlier testers have found dangerous substances such as arsenic and bromate, both known carcinogens. And bottled water comes with its own list of unknown hazards from chemicals leached into the water from the plastic bottles. Hauter maintains, "Tap water is still the best choice for most Americans."

The AP research extends knowledge detailed in a survey of contaminants in tap water conducted by the nonprofit Environmental Working Group published in December 2005.

Tap water in 42 states is contaminated with more than 140 unregulated chemicals that lack safety standards, the Environmental Working Group found during a 30 month investigation of water suppliers' tests of the treated tap water.

"Environmental Working Group's studies show that tap water across the U.S. is contaminated and now we know that millions of Americans are also drinking low level mixtures of pharmaceuticals with every glass of water," said Jane Houlihan, Environmental Working Group vice president for research.

"The health effect of this cocktail of chemicals and drugs hasn't been studied but we are concerned about the effects on infants and others who are vulnerable, Houlihan said.

Environmental Working Group analysis shows that of the top 200 drugs in the United States, 13 percent list serious side effects at levels less than 100 parts per billion, ppb, in human blood, with some causing potential health risks in the parts-per-trillion range.

A national tap water atlas published online by the Environmental Working Group shows tap water testing results from 40,000 communities around the country. View the atlas at: http://www.ewg.org/sites/tapwater/

The drug residues in tap water join hundreds of other synthetic chemicals Americans are exposed to daily, as contaminants in food, water, and air, or in common consumer products.

The environmental groups are asking the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to take swift action to set standards for pollutants in tap water that will protect the health of Americans nationwide, including children and others most vulnerable to health risks from these exposures.

Distributed without profit to ESA Great Lakes District membership for educational purposes.



















 
 Respond to this message   
AuthorReply
M. Schaus
(Login MagillaSchaus)
ESA - GREAT LAKES DISTRICT CO-DIRECTOR
72.88.44.212

I urinated nuclear piss and like many other N.Y. State cancer patients pissed it away.

March 12 2008, 2:26 PM 

img src="




The link here shows the pollutants in New York State tap water.


http://www.ewg.org/tapwater/statereports/statereport.php?state=NY



I was given an injection of nuclear dye material last year. that was radioactive. The radioactive injection was for a CT scan. I was low level, hot for I think for longer than a day. Now I know that I'm partly to blame for polluting the tap water in the Great Lakes. My nuclear urine mixed with the water supply. The urine was eliminated from tap water but not the radioactivity.

In my opinion people should be given urine collection containers to prevent nuclear materials from being flushed down the tiolet after necessasy medical tests.


Everyone today is being exposed in many ways to toxic and nuclear substances. Firefighters are like canaries in a cancer coal mine in my opinion. The human race probably is seeing the spread of cancer because of how we dispose much of our different wastes directly into the water we draw our drinking water from.

Ralph Nader was involved with getting the passage of the Clean Water Act decades ago. These laws are not being paid attention to or strictly enforced. It is arrogant of leaders to say they are for cleaning up the environment while sewage plants dump treated and untreated waste into the water, ocean going ships dump their ballasts of invasive species into the Great Lakes, and when the water of the U.S. and Canada contains small dozages of a cross section of every sort of pollutant imaginable. It is the cumulative effect over a long time where small dozages may accumulate and go off some day inside like a cancer time bomb.

My promise to myself is that the next time I have any test where nuclear materials are injected into me that afterwards I will collect them when I urinate in a plastic bottle and try to see that they get disposed in a manner that does not put them into our water. At this time it seams that this is a non issue. In my opinion it should be an issue of importance because of the thousands who every year have such needed testing. A few drops become a few quarts become a few gallons ect.

I still cannot believe all this crap is in our drinking water.


    
This message has been edited by MagillaSchaus from IP address 72.88.106.7 on Mar 19, 2008 1:39 AM
This message has been edited by MagillaSchaus from IP address 72.88.106.7 on Mar 19, 2008 1:31 AM
This message has been edited by MagillaSchaus from IP address 72.88.106.7 on Mar 19, 2008 1:25 AM
This message has been edited by MagillaSchaus from IP address 72.88.106.7 on Mar 19, 2008 1:22 AM
This message has been edited by MagillaSchaus from IP address 72.88.106.7 on Mar 19, 2008 1:20 AM
This message has been edited by MagillaSchaus from IP address 72.88.106.7 on Mar 19, 2008 1:20 AM
This message has been edited by MagillaSchaus from IP address 72.88.106.7 on Mar 19, 2008 1:20 AM
This message has been edited by MagillaSchaus from IP address 72.88.106.7 on Mar 19, 2008 1:20 AM
This message has been edited by MagillaSchaus from IP address 72.88.44.212 on Mar 12, 2008 5:50 PM
This message has been edited by MagillaSchaus from IP address 72.88.44.212 on Mar 12, 2008 2:32 PM
This message has been edited by MagillaSchaus from IP address 72.88.44.212 on Mar 12, 2008 2:29 PM


 
 Respond to this message   
M. Schaus
(Login MagillaSchaus)
ESA - GREAT LAKES DISTRICT CO-DIRECTOR
72.88.44.212

Sorry I mistakenly posted this here instead of on the Mother Earth page.

March 12 2008, 2:35 PM 

Perhaps this should be on this page because as surfers and humans we couldn't exist without water.


Check out this water site about water filters:

http://www.care2.com/greenliving/world-water-day.html


    
This message has been edited by MagillaSchaus from IP address 72.88.44.212 on Mar 12, 2008 3:31 PM


 
 Respond to this message   
M. Schaus
(Login MagillaSchaus)
ESA - GREAT LAKES DISTRICT CO-DIRECTOR
72.88.106.7

Buffalo News -Letter to the Editor: "Proper drug disposal should be discussed"

March 19 2008, 1:16 AM 

Proper drug disposal should be discussed



A common scenario: someone close to you dies after years of taking a variety of medication. You’re faced with having to safely and responsibly dispose of all the unused pills. Have you heard of or seen any guidelines published by a pharmaceutical firm or government agency? No? I haven’t either.

So, what to do? Just throw everything out with the day’s garbage when nobody’s looking? Flush the stuff down the toilet?

Either option raises several serious questions. Are filtration plants capable of preventing dangerous amounts of any such substances from getting into our water supply? Is there a clearly measurable difference between a “safe” and “unsafe” level for any contaminant? And what can we look forward to when the long-term side effects of these insidious cocktails will have years of our increased life expectancy in which to do their work? Remember, these are not ordinary pollutants. They’ve been engineered specifically to affect the human system.

Are any environmentalists concerned about this? They should be. So, too, should all who try to be careful about what goes into our bodies.

Stanley H. Cieslar

Buffalo, New York






 
 Respond to this message   
Current Topic - Environmental News Service: "Pharmaceuticals Again Found in U.S. Drinking Water"
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>RETURN TO INDEX  
New Page 3 New Page 2