Duluth News Tribune:
http://www.duluthnewstribune.com/event/article/id/117737/
Published April 15 2009
Saltie owners blast Wisconsin ballast rules
Superior port officials and ship owners assail the Wisconsin DNR effort to curtail the spread of invasive species.
By: John Myers, Duluth News Tribune
Opponents of the new rules say the Department of Natural Resources’ current proposal brings too much regulation too fast for the shipping industry to meet, and may force oceangoing commerce to avoid Wisconsin ports.
“The state’s current plan would be devastating for CHS in Superior,” said Tim Powers, vice president of the local CHS Inc. grain terminal. Powers estimated the facility, the largest grain terminal in the U.S. by capacity, would lose half its business and might be forced to close under the DNR regulations.
The 655-foot Federal Welland, owned by Montreal-based Fednav, is Superior’s first saltwater ship of the season. Docked at the CHS facility, it has been taking on 23,000 metric tons of durum wheat bound for Algeria.
Superior officials are asking the DNR to wait for a federal standard on ballast water or relax rules to match Minnesota standards already in place.
The DNR in February announced plans to regulate ballast in oceangoing ships starting in 2012. The plan would require salties to treat ballast tanks and kill living organisms to a level 100 times greater than the International Maritime Organization has proposed in existing ships and 1,000 times IMO levels for new ships. California and New York have adopted similar standards.
“It’s nearly an impossible situation for us to meet,” said George Robichon, Fednav’s senior vice president, noting no on-board treatment system has yet been proven completely effective. “You can’t just go to Wal-Mart and buy a ballast system.”
DNR officials said the proposal allows for exceptions for ship owners if there is no viable treatment available by 2012.
Minnesota enacted its ballast rule in September, giving ships until 2016 to start treating ballast and adopting the less stringent IMO level of treatment. Minnesota’s law goes further than Wisconsin’s, however, by also applying to Great Lakes freighters that never enter the ocean.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency earlier this year announced it, too, may consider imposing ballast treatment regulations on a national basis. The Coast Guard and Congress also are considering ballast rules, although, despite a decade of discussion, no single federal standard exists.
“Everyone is waiting to see what the U.S. federal standard will be,” Robichon said, adding that the patchwork of state laws is unworkable.
Superior Mayor Dave Ross said the DNR plan threatens the Twin Ports’ 2,000 waterfront-related jobs and millions of dollars in payroll and taxes.
But others note that more than 180 nonnative organisms have entered the Great Lakes since the 19th century, killing native species, fouling intake lines, disrupting ecosystems and damaging sport angling that supports tourism.
Paul Luebke, the DNR wastewater specialist drafting the permit, said there is no time frame for the agency to make a final decision.
Duluth and Superior are especially vulnerable to ballast invasions because a high percentage of ships arrive empty or with less than full loads and must carry ballast water to help balance the ship. As cargo is loaded, the ballast water often is released.
3 comments
fred s. 04/15/2009 10:59 AM
These guys don't give a damn about our lake, only profit. They're just smaller versions of Wall Street Banks and Health Care Businesses. Whining wealthy capitalists that don't want their profit stream to slow. If they spent less on lobbying and more on treatment solutions, this wouldn't be an issue. Their first response is always the jobs lost paper tiger. BS.
Report a Violation
Patrick S. Moose Lake, MN 04/15/2009 7:13 AM
Thanks to Wisconsin DNR for trying to enact rules that might actually be effective. (From Pawlenty's Minnesota, Land of 10,000 Business Scams)
Report a Violation
trent w. Duluth, MN 04/15/2009 6:54 AM
People need to wake up. This is not just about Lake Superior. Once these ugly things make it to the Harbor they can spread across all our inland lakes. We already have spiny water fleas spreading across the BWCA and Voyagers. We have VHS knocking at our door. What's the economic impact of VHS across our inland lakes??? What will our children think when they find out we could have prevented this but lacked the political will to do it?
---
Distributed without profit to ESA Great Lakes District members who have expressed an interest in receiving aquatic invasive species information for research and educational purposes.