a thought that has gone threw my mind is this: "everything ive read, paints paula jones as a monster, but she saved all of anissa's money and then she gave anissa all the money when anissa turned 18. if this is true, paula jones could not have been simply pure, greedy, evil. if paula jones saved anissa's money and then turned it over to her on anissa's 18th birthday, this was a mother who did not know how to be a functional mother. paula jones may have been disfunctional, neurotic, mean, cruel, and clueless, but does that mean was intentionally evil?".
isnt it ironic, that anissa would have lived, if paula had been truly evil and greedy and spent the money on herself? if paula had never saved a dime of anissa's money, and spent it on herself, anissa would not have had a cent to spend on drugs on her 18th birthday.