<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  

kits best historical accuracy

July 3 2009 at 4:29 PM
stefanuccio  (no login)
from IP address 41.2.31.106

allo hallo
i like to know what is the general opinion on which range of 1/35 scale models of armour you raccomand in terms of historical accuracy
thanks
ciao stefano

 
 Respond to this message   
AuthorReply

(no login)
24.164.2.234

Most brands have some good kits BUT...

July 3 2009, 5:18 PM 

Overall, if you are not very familiar with all of the different vehicles and model companies, its hard to go wrong with Tamiya kits. Often they are not as fancy as other kits, but more often they are better overall. Tamiya does have some very old kits that are not so good, but even a "bad" Tamiya kit from 30 years ago can be better than some new kits by other companies. Tamiya has also replaced many of their old kits with all new versions.

Dragon has some very nice kits but also some real dogs mixed in. And none of the kits are really easy builds. You have to know which kits are good and which are poor. In some ways Dragon has gotten worse... they give more parts and details, lots of things like photo etch, metal parts, etc. but accuracy and buildability has really declined.

Italeri has some good kits but some poor ones also. Again you have to look up reviews of each kit.


 
 Respond to this message   
stefanuccio
(no login)
41.2.31.106

Re: Most brands have some good kits BUT...

July 3 2009, 6:23 PM 

hallo David
thanks very much for your comprhensive response
ciao stefano

 
 Respond to this message   

(Login Lachmeister)
HyperScale Forums
114.77.119.190

i agree totally n/t

July 3 2009, 10:12 PM 


 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)
87.113.101.249

You had best watch out..

July 4 2009, 7:16 AM 

You had best watch out for Tamiya and others where British colours and schemes are required. Their instruction sheets often leave a lot, and sometimes everything, to be desired. Do some independant research before you apply the paint. The latest Matilda II is still is not correct but to be honest, better than most efforts at this scheme.

 
 Respond to this message   
Current Topic - kits best historical accuracy
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  

Please note a few points of etiquette. First, would all contributors please use their real name and/or their actual e-mail address. All contributions are welcome but please refrain from political or abusive comments. These posts will promptly be removed from the server. Off-topic posts will also be removed from the server. Repeat offenders will be blocked from accessing all of HyperScale's Forums.

In addition, "Tank Talk" is not a forum for the public criticism of the models that appear as Galleries or Articles. Please make any suggestions for improvements or criticism direct to the author via the email link at the bottom of the Article.

Finally, please note that this Discussion Group is privately operated and that I reserve the right to delete any post for any reason whatsoever.