so thenJune 15 2008 at 8:58 AM
|y (no login)|
Response to " like I said below
what is the arguement about?
if we define God, then we either believe or disbelieve what we define
doesn't change reality one bit
all scientific proof must first DEFINE what one is proving
or there is nothing scientific about it
the most anyone can do on these forums is TRY TO DEFINE what they believe God is to "THEM"
if there is no concensus, then there certainly can not be any PROVING that belief!!
its personal and subjective
however, those who CLAIM TO BELIEVE IN THE SAME GOD and DEFINE HIM THE SAME WAY, they can talk about him and try prove him through that MEANS they DEFINE HIM BY:
for Bible believers, the BIBLE is the WORD OF GOD
they should STICK to the WHOLE BIBLE as the PROOF of his character and existence:
only one problem with this belief
how much does each reader understand what they are reading?
- " so then - ___mn__(^ ¿ ^)__nm___ on Jun 15, 2008, 9:05 AM
- The "argument"... - Pope Reverend I, BV on Jun 15, 2008, 9:58 AM
- dang - y on Jun 15, 2008, 12:53 PM