They talk about and belittleSeptember 11 2011 at 7:38 PM
Vince (Login MoxiFox)
Response to A Brief Glance at the News for Today...
9/11 truthers ... as having a whole bunch of wild-eyed theories and no foundational consensus amongst them.
Unfortunately, this is true to an extent. There IS a consensus amongst them, which is .... 9/11 was an inside job, PERPETUATED by elements of the U.S. government ... but they -(some of them, at least)- allow themselves to go down the rabbit trail of trying to CONCLUDE the means by which the towers were brought down. And then, because they disagree on their conclusions ... they get mad at each other for having wrong theories. It's these squabbles that are exploited by main-stream media to discredit the entire movement because the movement can't agree amongst THEMSELVES as to what they're actually theorizing.
I get annoyed too ... at some of the strange conclusions coming out.
One of them is the Judy Wood theory that the buildings were disintegrated by some kind of high energy beam and that the structures were turned into dust which then disappeared somewhere. In this theory too, there were no planes hitting the towers; just ILLUSIONS of planes ... created by some kind of holographic projection.
Another theory involves "mini-nukes". In this theory, small nuclear explosive devices were placed at the bases of the twin towers WHEN THE TOWERS WERE CONSTRUCTED ... so that they could be brought down when their life cycle expired.
The mini-nuke theory hypothesizes that the nukes created HOLES ... into which the towers then sank!~
I don't know how any sane logical person could ever swallow a mini-nuke theory because we didn't SEE any tower sinking into the ground. The evidence is absolutely clear that the towers exploded from the top down, sequentially, throwing column sections upward and outward in a shower that resembled small sticks or water being shaken from a dog's back. NONE of the evidence supports the effects of nuclear explosion. Nuclear explosions create SINGLE massive blasts the keep enlarging "endlessly" for about 30 seconds. The towers were completely down and out in about 10 seconds. Do these people have ANY concept of the workings of nuclear explosions ... or of physics, period? Obviously not.
And the Judy Wood theory has -perhaps- a wee bit more plausibility to it but it too ... totally rejects certain elements of hard evidence. Obviously, we saw the towers coming DOWN. There were pieces ... coming DOWN. Yet, she contends that the towers were "dustified" and taken UP!!
Did the two planes strike the towers and from their own energy, enter totally ... like a hot knife going through butter? To me, that's a mystery which hasn't been answered and remains an open question. The evidence shows that the crashes weren't single events in themselves because a plane striking an object creates ONE large bashing sound coupled with a "roar" of metal striking other stuff as the plane is decelerated by the crashing. What witnesses describe and what we can hear on video, is a COUPLE of hard explosions -bmpp, bmpp- or, as Scott Forbes described, "like a dump truck going over a bump in the road." That's it; that's the sound .... of a dump truck hitting a bump and banging the box down on the frame a couple of times.
What truthers don't seem to understand is that it's not THEIR job to conclude the investigation ... when no decent unrestricted investigation has even yet been allowed. No matter what they speculate, it makes no difference to any official outcome. The only thing which clearly stands out is that this was a crime which the preponderance of evidence overwhelmingly shows ... to have been participated in ... by the government of the United States (and likely Israel as well).