I know what you mean about Alex. I have the same perception. As I do with some of the other Messengers of the 'Light', by which I mean, I guess, those that may do things in their own way, make their own paths, mainly for the better ment of all, though some for maybe ego reasons, but never the less do and can benefit the all!
Someone like Madame Blavatsky, some brilliant ideas and thinking, but some possible concepts (dependng on how they are interpreted
), that I don't quite resonate with. Crowley had some deep set communciations and indeed some amazing thinking, yet an inflated ego maybe. As do, or it did appear, to be the case a lot.
Some amazing Lights who chose, choose their own ways and beliefs, most personal and unique, as I think all paths should be, else what can be learned if not from, well, unique again, sum total experiences. (Though not all past experiences may be remembered, I am sure they affect the present level of individual consciousness.
David Icke, for me, is almost 100 per cent, a guy named David Boyle, is also close to that, (what is a hundred per cent anyway, as my own understandings continual shift in many areas), anyway etc...
So we don't look or need a perfect communicator because IT is not meant to be that way, just some folks with pieces of a puzzle and their own human lessons to work with that brings more and higher Rememberings.
It's quit silly imo, to take, say a Messenger like Jesus and Buddha and try and make them so PERFECT, whatever that means. They were Messengers of their own Paths and they were Spirit in human forms, which means, imo, they had a physical life to live in this earth experience.
Hence, we would be pretty silly to discard wisdom from anywhere just because the messeneger had / has some earthly human , er, misdeameners (according to the 'norm' anyway
), like wine , women and the love of self, and the like.