... you're not avoiding, "you're just not interested".

Aren't euphemisms great fun?

So, "you're just not interested" when something you yourself posted (about) is being addressed and shown to be false eh? Not a dead give-away at all, is it?

I mean, really, why would you want to post, and start a thread, about something you have no interest in? Doesn't posting about something imply at least some interest?

Fact is, Dave is dead wrong about what he claims about the olympic rings and flames, demonstrably so.

How come then you haven't followed Dave's advise yet and checked out what he claims about the olympic rings and flame for yourself and not taking his word for it?

I have, so, what is it exactly that is holding you back?

propositions which imply their own negation are necessarily false
whereas propositions implied by their own negation are necessarily true

rejected and denied by many, accepted and embraced by few : falsifiability
- it is not what we (think we) know that matters, it is what we can show true that does
as the maxim demands; truth is demonstrably fact and fact is demonstrably true
everything else ... mere BS -

New!! Improved!! Now With CDEH-Formula!!


CD: short for inevitability