for ppl to buy her books or send her money. She operates a website where she has many ppl who mindlessly follow her like the religious follow televangelists. I don't see much difference. She is against religion and says it's the religionists who are evil, they say she is. If religion was the evil she claimed she wouldn't mimic it.
Here's a recent post from her. One should note that when she defends Zeitgeist, she is careful to say she ONLY defends the first part of Zeitgeist. The post below shows that she doesn't agree with all of it:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Christ_Conspiracy/message/11490
There is a fabricated and stunningly mindless push within academic circles to white-wash the predatory role of Islam against Europe over the centuries, to transmute the numerous wars of Muslim nations against Europeans, the millions of European slaves taken by Muslim pirates in the Mediterranean, the gigantic wars of conquest and enslavement launched into Spain and France, and into the Balkans up into Austria, to make all of that something benign and actually helpful, as if it was responsible for uplifting primitive barbarian Europeans into the Enlightenment and Renaissance. This is like saying Hitler liberated the Jews, and that the high numbers of Jewish people winning Nobel Prizes today is due to the influence of Nazism on Jewish culture. It is the most foul and dirty lie, promulgated by clever propagandists with very clear political agendas for facilitating an Islamification of Europe in the modern time. The aim appears directed to making Western people think "gosh, those smart Muslims, we really owe them a lot" and hence to increase immigration from those "smart" Muslim lands, and not to worry when groups of punkish Muslim youths, who dropped out of school before they could get to the advanced mathematics or physics classes, much less to speak the language of their adopted homelands, are caught trying to plant terror-bombs. People should use their own eyes to see for themselves how Islam works to block the intellect, to render its believers incapable of critical thinking, and how its rules against artistic expressions -- for example, forbidding images of people or animals -- permitting only a brain-numbing calligraphy, a thousand ways to write "God Is Great" on a mosque wall, but nothing else.
"Islamic science" to the extent that it existed, was the product of conquest and acquisition, with scientifically-thinking people of other religions and cultures being the real inventors and scholars within Muslim-dominated regions -- peoples of Greek, Christian, Jewish, Assyrian, and other multiple non-Muslim backgrounds, were always the ones who made the discoveries and contributions to which Muslims are today grabbing onto psychologically, to prop up their current sorry social conditions. And in those cases where Muslims did make discoveries, in the majority of cases these were forced converts to Islam, having a sword put to their neck. The Greek Christian scholars then became "Muslim scholars", with the writings of Aristotle and so many others, giving a foundation to "Islamic science", which did not persist due to its dependence upon captured infidels, who invariably died, without any larger group of students to whom they could pass along their knowledge, given how that knowledge almost invariably undermined Islamic totalitarianism.
The whole sorry business is like the al-Qaeda bombers using cell-phones as detonators for their murderous bomb-making, and then claiming they invented the cell-phone and dynamite. Well, I suppose we can grant to them the "novel use" of a cell-phone in this case, and give them a patent on that idea. Or the "invention of the concept of zero" -- which actually came from India -- "Islamic science" is also something of a Big Zero, an oxymoron, with little more than the term itself being an invention.
The article below speaks to a new book by a Prof. Gouguenheim, breaking with this foul tradition of distortions, throwing off the "New History" being funded by Saudi petro-dollars globally, or as enthusiastically written by people who have no problems with totalitarian Islamic culture. Note the "sarcastic" statement by one of the Islam-friendly critics of Gouguenheim -- his sarcasm is the truth, but he does not appreciate it. The article also exposes some connection between the old Nazis and Islam as well -- we know this in the context of Hitler's friendly embrace of Haj Amin al-Husseini, the Mufti of Jerusalem, in their shared plans to exterminate the Jews and other non-Muslims of the Middle East. Also such historical tid-bits as the nation of Persia changing its name to "Iran" -- what we in the West would call "Aryan" -- as a quite voluntary supplication to Nazism and Hitlerism by yet another big chunk of the Islamic world. Or the various SS officers fled to Islamic nations after the war, to escape the hangman's noose, whereupon they converted to Islam, took Muslim names, and were absorbed into the armies of the Arab League for the multiple wars launched against the young state of Israel. Gouguenheim adds more to this history, pointing out how one old Nazi wrote an influential text about "Europe's Debt to Islam" in the post-war period. Oh, the problem is, the book is not out in English. Only in French, but if you speak French there is a copy on Amazon.com for over $100. The truth may set you free, but is rarely free by itself.
http://www.amazon.com/fausses-terreurs-lan-mil-approfondissement/dp/2708405667
Much of this has been covered previously by other scholars, such as Bat-Yeor, Andrew Bostom and Robert Spencer, and we have a long list of such books (at a more reasonable price) in the "Saharasia Today" section of our on-line bookstore:
http://www.naturalenergyworks.net But it is an historical episode about which not enough has yet penetrated into the public mind. The multi-culturalist ideologues who are promoting Islam into the West do not have our best interests at heart.
Man neither chooses physical life, nor does he choose spiritual life. Both are gifts from God.
such as dwellings, works of carpentry, self-written manuscripts etc..? 
