'Oh to be in England, now that April's here', wrote the poet Robert Browning, but in these ritual-soaked months of 2012 it would be more appropriate to say 'Oh not to be in London now that June is here' and July, and August. It is a summer of mass rituals orchestrated by the bloodline families of the global Control System to fundamentally manipulate the energy field of London and, by its knock-on effect, the rest of Britain and the wider world ...
... I have been emphasising for a long time, as I did two weeks ago in the newsletter about the Olympic flame, that what we focus on - give our attention to - we energetically connect with. Once that happens, if we are dealing with a manipulative force, our energy can be vampired through that connection. Information or energetic perception programs can also come the other way and infiltrate the psyche. I suggest that both are happening in London this summer as one of the key locations on the Earth energy (information) grid is being subjected to two enormous mass rituals ...
... How outrageous it all is for this focus and finance to be showered on one woman and one family. Members of Parliament, judges, the military, Intelligence personnel, police officers and even Christian clergy all swear an oath of allegiance to the Queen when they take office - not to the people of the country. It's her parliament, her military, her MI5 and MI6, her police, her Church.
The Queen stands on the blood red carpet to address her parliament, her clergy and her judges surrounded by her military and her silly men in silly clothes of red, black and gold. We don't even have a national anthem in Britain - we have an anthem to the Queen. The Monarch is purely symbolic? Oh please. She is the symbol of state power and she has literal power behind the scenes. Woe betide anyone who crosses her. Are you expected to bow or curtsy to a member of the official government? No, but they are to her. So where does the real power lie? ...
... I do everything by intuition and my intuition at the end of last year said hire the Wembley Arena in north London for October 2012 and so we did so despite the financial risks. It is becoming ever clearer why that was done, coming as it does after the summer that is literally ablaze with mass rituals designed to vampire the peoples' energy, draw power to the Illuminati global centre in London and encode the energy grid with their Satanic vibration
The Illuminati families think they have the power, but their power is only our power that they steal from us. The truth is that we have the power to end this nonsense - and we need to use it very soon
The Queen's Diamond Jubilee 'beacon' (prime Illuminati symbol) near Buckingham Palace. It was lit by the Queen using a crystal diamond to activate the mechanism and it completed the ritual sequence of more than 4,000 beacons that were illuminated across Britain and the world.
You're quite unique Jackie.
There aren't many who can actually see into this grotesqe charade, especially if you've suffered a compulsory English indoctrination in early life.
"I have been emphasising for a long time, as I did two weeks ago in the newsletter about the Olympic flame, that what we focus on - give our attention to - we energetically connect with."
So Dave, you have given us something that is not true but posed it as fact(ual) to focus on - give our attention too - energetically connect with. Why would you want to do that then?
propositions which imply their own negation are necessarily false whereas propositions implied by their own negation are necessarily true
rejected and denied by many, accepted and embraced by few : falsifiability
- it is not what we (think we) know that matters, it is what we can show true that does
as the maxim demands; truth is demonstrably fact and fact is demonstrably true
everything else ... mere BS -
We are all messengers with messages. We can share what we feel needs to be known and we all have capabilties, including intuition and discernment.
Some things resonate, some things do not.
That's OK! There is no one way to share / communicate, some of us are more visual, audio, artistic, intellectual, we prefer / attract colours, channelling, path working.
We can only share in our own ways as others can only recieve in their own ways.
David has always said, as he does now, as all wise messengers say, go check out what I say for yourself. Do not take my word. You checked out something and formed your opinion - good!
And no, fact does not equal opinion, opinion can contain fact though.
Now consider what Dave posed as fact as well: "I have been emphasising for a long time, as I did two weeks ago in the newsletter about the Olympic flame, that what we focus on - give our attention to - we energetically connect with. Once that happens, if we are dealing with a manipulative force, Once that happens, if we are dealing with a manipulative force, our energy can be vampired through that connection. Information or energetic perception programs can also come the other way and infiltrate the psyche."
So, Dave has given us something that is not true but posed it as fact(ual), apparently to focus on - give our attention too - energetically connect with. Why would he want to do that then? After all, when that happens, when we are dealing with a manipulative forse, our energy can be vampired through that connection and information or energetic perception programs can also come the other way and infiltrate the psyche, right?
But please, go check out what I say for yourself. Do not take my word for it.
propositions which imply their own negation are necessarily false whereas propositions implied by their own negation are necessarily true
rejected and denied by many, accepted and embraced by few : falsifiability - it is not what we (think we) know that matters, it is what we can show true that does as the maxim demands; truth is demonstrably fact and fact is demonstrably true everything else ... mere BS -
New!! Improved!! Now With CDEH-Formula!!
CD: short for inevitability
This message has been edited by JVH on Jun 13, 2012 11:32 AM
I'm sure Dave is not perfect, which isn't the point.
The point is that Dave poses something as fact(ual) which it is not, yet attaches all kinds of value judgements to it and even derives stuff from it posed as fact(ual) as well.
Alas, things derived -and posed as fact(ual)- from propositions not true, cannot possibly be true.
In effect Dave is exactly doing that what he accuses others of, and those accusations aren't kiddie stuff either.
Now what?
rejected and denied by many, accepted and embraced by few : falsifiability
- it is not what we (think we) know that matters, it is what we can show true that does
as the maxim demands; truth is demonstrably fact and fact is demonstrably true
everything else ... mere BS -
... are you familiar with a phenomenon known as "avoiding the issue"?
propositions which imply their own negation are necessarily false whereas propositions implied by their own negation are necessarily true
rejected and denied by many, accepted and embraced by few : falsifiability
- it is not what we (think we) know that matters, it is what we can show true that does
as the maxim demands; truth is demonstrably fact and fact is demonstrably true
everything else ... mere BS -
... you're not avoiding, "you're just not interested".
Aren't euphemisms great fun?
So, "you're just not interested" when something you yourself posted (about) is being addressed and shown to be false eh? Not a dead give-away at all, is it?
I mean, really, why would you want to post, and start a thread, about something you have no interest in? Doesn't posting about something imply at least some interest?
Fact is, Dave is dead wrong about what he claims about the olympic rings and flames, demonstrably so.
How come then you haven't followed Dave's advise yet and checked out what he claims about the olympic rings and flame for yourself and not taking his word for it?
I have, so, what is it exactly that is holding you back?
propositions which imply their own negation are necessarily false whereas propositions implied by their own negation are necessarily true
rejected and denied by many, accepted and embraced by few : falsifiability - it is not what we (think we) know that matters, it is what we can show true that does as the maxim demands; truth is demonstrably fact and fact is demonstrably true everything else ... mere BS -
New!! Improved!! Now With CDEH-Formula!!
CD: short for inevitability
This message has been edited by JVH on Jun 14, 2012 10:48 AM
So you want me to answer to YOU about something YOU have a gripe with??
June 14 2012, 11:28 AM
I don't answer to you, J dear. Stop being so silly.
Look again J, in case you don't get IT.
If you have a problem with something that David has said, then speak to David.
I have no problem. If you don't like it that I have no problem, then that is your problem. Nowt to do with me.
As far as I am concerned. IT IS FINISHED!
BTW, I can post anything at any time about anything for any reason, J. I do not need to explain anything to you. People are free to condemn me as I AM free to poo poo their condemnations.
You seem to have a lil ole bee in your bonnet about summit, but not my problem, hun, yours.
... you don't have to. I'm merely addressing something you posted, that's how forums work.
And as it so happens, you posted (about) something someone claims as true but isn't, demonstrably so, but attaches all kinds of value judgements to it nonetheless and even claims all kinds of consequences because of what is claimed as true but isn't - in effect being guilty of the same he is accusing of, wittingly or unwittingly.
So, the claimee is wrong about what he poses as true? Big deal, right? Wrong. That's not the point. The point, of course, is another: it's the far reaching implications of being wrong in this case that is the point, and you know it - hence your attempts to avoid addressing it which in itself should tell you there's something amiss here.
You see, dear J, avoiding what is being pointed out to you equals denying it, which, of course, begs the question: why would you want to deny something that is demonstrably so? Why won't you have it true although it is?
propositions which imply their own negation are necessarily false whereas propositions implied by their own negation are necessarily true
rejected and denied by many, accepted and embraced by few : falsifiability - it is not what we (think we) know that matters, it is what we can show true that does as the maxim demands; truth is demonstrably fact and fact is demonstrably true everything else ... mere BS -
New!! Improved!! Now With CDEH-Formula!!
CD: short for inevitability
This message has been edited by JVH on Jun 14, 2012 8:05 PM This message has been edited by JVH on Jun 14, 2012 7:52 PM
I wasn't aware I'm not to take too serious this "london lockdown" thing you reproduced here.
I could've sworn this "london lockdown" thing together with this related "illuminat symbols" thing you reproduced here as well is quite some serious stuff.
What was I thinking eh?
Must be a case of 'lockdown' ... how ironically appropriate.
rejected and denied by many, accepted and embraced by few : falsifiability
- it is not what we (think we) know that matters, it is what we can show true that does
as the maxim demands; truth is demonstrably fact and fact is demonstrably true
everything else ... mere BS -
We 'know' each other too long already to let a few words get in the way, well, that's how it works for me anyway. Anyone is my friend, untill shown otherwise. Simple really.
You are just sharing opinion and thoughts which, I realize, are mere reflections of the mind (set).
After all, when we listen to what people say, that is, if we listen to the adjectives they use to describe other people; we might notice they are usually telling us nothing about the other person but more so about themselves, in effect doing us a favor (of the clarifying kind).
So, just keep speaking your mind, it's one of the things I welcome most.
rejected and denied by many, accepted and embraced by few : falsifiability
- it is not what we (think we) know that matters, it is what we can show true that does
as the maxim demands; truth is demonstrably fact and fact is demonstrably true
everything else ... mere BS -
Just this morning my hubby said to me, why did you snap at me. I never meant what I said as a criticism, just a remark.
I should know better really.
A group of people can look at a one thing and they will 'see' through their own perception, which is really a creation of our own each experiences and interpretations to date, (if you get what I mean) and each will make something different of this 'thing'.
Which is why so much can be classed illusiory becaue we each have created our own 'reality' so to speak.
rejected and denied by many, accepted and embraced by few : falsifiability
- it is not what we (think we) know that matters, it is what we can show true that does
as the maxim demands; truth is demonstrably fact and fact is demonstrably true
everything else ... mere BS -
As the great messenger Dave I tells us, it's aaaaaaaaall illusion anyway.
rejected and denied by many, accepted and embraced by few : falsifiability
- it is not what we (think we) know that matters, it is what we can show true that does
as the maxim demands; truth is demonstrably fact and fact is demonstrably true
everything else ... mere BS -
We appear to be solid. But at the smallest levels we are comprised of waves. Atoms are mainly empty space. A marble in the middle, specks of dust revolving at a distance of a football field.
Icke might be wrong about some things. But that doesn't mean he is wrong about everything. Let's not poison the well.
The point, of course, is not that Icke is wrong or not, the point is the implictions of what he is wrong about when he is.
rejected and denied by many, accepted and embraced by few : falsifiability
- it is not what we (think we) know that matters, it is what we can show true that does
as the maxim demands; truth is demonstrably fact and fact is demonstrably true
everything else ... mere BS -
I have no doubt that these people are into the occult and are probably performing rituals that have been passed down among their ruling circles. But more than anything, they're probably living in a fantasy world as it could be possible that they may be trying to vamp energy, but they might not realize that it's not really doing anything. It's like having a ritual to vamp energy to make Santa come to your home.
When you look at people that become disillusioned from the earth and center their lives around money and power, they lose touch with reality and end up performing bizarre and strange rituals. Especially when they feel that things may be coming to an end.
Something that has happened to many famous Musicians where they become big and famous, and then they develop a paranoia that they will lose their creative abilities because they have no idea where it comes from. So, they do things to "keep" it, thinking it's working. I think something similar has happened with the royals. The old ruling class from the dark ages performed rituals to keep their control which in some form, has been passed down to today. At the same time, I would imagine that if there was a real art and power to be gathered from their rituals in the past, it has probably been lost. I'd imagine that Prince William and Harry are probably more interested in playing X-box than they are in performing rituals.
Either way, these people are out of touch with reality and most likely, they see people waking up and they want to "join in" and make it look like they're part of this change and embrace it. I saw it more as a circus show than anything else. And it they are truly performing rituals backstage thinking they are vamping energy, well..... LoL on somebody either way.
is that it sort of works like "beginner's luck". When first a person is introduced to spiritual "power" and signs himself to it ... it WORKS! But over time, the "miracles" become fewer and fewer and the person dedicates himself more and more to serving it .. in hopes of getting back that original big bang.
I don't know what it is or what to call it but it seems to be the same kind of thing that happens with drugs: at first it's fantastic ... then the effect wears off ... and then the "addicted" person does more and more drugs in an attempt to capture that first glorious experience.
In the pursuit of that elusive euphoric goal ... a lot of needless destruction and heartbreak is often wrought. It's "for the greater good" ... after all.
Here's a character that was huge into rituals and he tried to apply the scientific method to understand rituals and magic better. His approach to rituals was that the most important factor was not so much the rituals itself, but the person performing it was the key, as that is where the real power comes from since they act like a channel for the manipulation of energy. And, what made you channel energy better was having unbending intent and a strong will. So, if you perform rituals and have the wrong person or people doing it, the rituals would be pretty much useless.
And so, Crowley spent his life constantly pushing the limits of his own mind so that he would never be limited or held back by anything. Things that would shock the ordinary person, would not even bother him. It was always about going further and further beyond your limits. Growing his intent and getting rid of his own limitations. It was all about being "free" and having nothing hold you back. He really became quite a despicable character, especially in regards to how he treated others.
But what did that really amount to in the end? Spending a lifetime of performing rituals and always "expanding" your mind...
When he was old, he ended up living in a rundown boarding home as a drug addict and had to be taken care of by other people. The irony being: he had little compassion for others in his quest to "expand his mind" during his whole life and now he relied on the compassion of others. (the very "thing" he deemed a "weakness" in himself) If everyone thought and acted like Aleister Crowley -- everything would fall apart and communities and soceity would not be able to function.
What it would seem like then -- is that if there are rituals that have power, they have to be in harmony with life and nature itself. Sort of like -- don't swim against the current. It's like with all the GMO foods that they are creating that are now backfiring left and right. They went against the current. If that's what the Royal family is doing if they are indeed doing rituals, it will probably backfire on them too. Or, it should have a long time ago if it had some real power.
Maybe they are a bit like Aleister Crowley -- indulging in their own insanity.
Was that locally the majority of people that celebrated this jubilee were the caribbeans and the Indians.
We have quite a few little African Spiritualist Churches in and around our area and they were out in full with their celebrations.
We did not have a single street party as far as I am aware from our estate.
I was chatting to an ambulance driver who was taking my mum to a hopsital appointment and when I asked why did he celebrate this occasion, he said simply, oh, we just love parties at anytime for anything!
The white English ambulance driver said to me. the Queen is rgeat. She brings in a lot of money to the country from tourism.
I said I do do not doubt that she does, but who receives te benefit of this atrtactive hoard is another question.
I'd imagine that most tourists that go to England, don't even get to meet or see the queen or get their pictures taken with her. Correct me if I am wrong here -- but I don't think the queen spends her days standing on the balcony at Buckingham palace, waving at everyone that goes by. From the looks of it, much of the tourists that go there, are going more for the sights and don't actually expect to see the queen. Saying that you need a queen there is sort of like saying that you need a King of the great pyramids, in order to get people to go visit Egypt.
But this reminds me of a talk I had with a guy once over the Calgary flames, that didn't want the team to ever leave our city and he was convinced that the city would be hurt finically because the city would lose jobs and money if the millionaires skated away.
I had to point out that the team didn't actually create money out of thin air, they only really "catch" the money that is already in circulation. So, if the team moved away, the thousands of people that spend millions each year buying tickets, would spend that money on something else in the city. The money doesn't vaporize into thin air when hockey players leave the city. It's recirculated back into the local economy and keeps flowing.
At the same time, you then end up with hockey players that come here, make millions of dollars and then take that money and retire somewhere warm. Along with the owners, who then probably spend that money on lady-boys in Thailand.
But at the same time -- are what these hockey players do -- is it really worth 10 million dollars a year to chase a puck around? What's more important? A hockey player or a farmer, or a cop, or a fire fighter, or a construction worker or an ambulance driver or someone stocking shelves in a supermarket?
If sports teams didn't get out of control and became centered around greed and money, it would be a much more healthy process. If sports players were paid what they are worth, people then wouldn't have to worry about their team leaving the city. And then you would find players that are actually loyal to a team and have pride and want to build a better community. All the extra revenue could then be used on projects around the city, instead of going into the pockets of a few people.
Although under the current system, this wouldn't work because any extra money laying around only creates more bureaucracy and more bureaucracy, starts to suck the "energy" out of the system more and more, as it keeps having to to expand more and more "energy" just to sustain itself as it keeps getting heavier and heaver. But, it's the idea that I am getting at because people have lost touch with values. Instead of one player getting 10 million a year, what if that money was used towards something the community needs while the player gets 100k?
And when you get people that are out of touch with values, they then justify why sports stars and queens need to make millions, when what they take from society and then give back, makes them parasites. When people get with reality, they realize that and their values change.
This is what's waking up so many people in the world to the corruption in politics, bankers and corporations. Their pocketbooks have been hit and the future is uncertain. As much as that's a bad thing, it's also something that must happen since it's making people question what is going on. Once your pocket book gets hit, your values change and you see things in a different light. And when you look at the Queen -- she stands for all the things that are against freedom of mankind: Banks, corporations, globalism, carbon taxes, population control, greed -- the queen would be a much different figure if she stood up and fought against these things instead of embracing them and then putting on a circus show to show that they embrace the freedom of mankind. That doesn't seem like a fair trade for a bit of tourism.
You can still have a queen -- Buckingham palace could be turned into a museum and the next queen could be like the princess they have at Disney world. Her job is simply to wave and greet people and have her picture taken with them. And you don't have to pay her an outrageous sum of cash to do it either.
And plus, doing things this way -- tourists could finally be going to England to see the queen and really mean it! Instead of dealing with a stuck-up wrinkly old mothball smelling cunt that probably still has people wiping her ass.
Some people still have never googled groom of the stool.
What can I say except it's quite amazing and uplifting for me when I come across that which I am so at one with. Thanks for sharing such a well thought out perception.
As for the 'groom of the stool', yes, I have come across this before and it all makes a total sense when it is put in context with all the surrounding paraphanalia of occult beliefs and worship this Elite group is into.
If one is truly unevolved () and wants to see the Queen of England, then it is a good idea for one to attend horse racing events as one is very much into them...
As for totally overpaid sports / singing / acting celebrities, well, I am of the mind all these sorts of activites should be done for fun and sharing and communicating and for FREE!
"What's more important? A hockey player or a farmer, or a cop, or a fire fighter, or a construction worker or an ambulance driver or someone stocking shelves in a supermarket? "