This entire debate on the Holocaust was quite amusing. For one I find that the people's automatic hatred for one who questions the truth most interesting. How is it that a bunch of people claiming they want to expose the truth question the very same people who do the as they do, just because the topic is a no no? After all, isn't it the winners who write the history books?
I see, for the most part, a large scale of people who care to call themselves survivalists, who do nothing more than talk. Talk about the injustices of the world, talk about how evil the media is, and detest what ground rules, sometimes keep the fabric of society woven together.
If society is really all that evil, answer me this: On what ground rules did these ideas of ours come? Obviously from society!!!
Yes society, the one very stepping stool to which we all wish to change in one way or the other.
Getting back to the holocaust issue now...
It appears to me that the ideas of this Zundel guy are somewhat off key. But that doesn't mean he's wrong, or anyone else for that matter. I am not here to praise him, nor am I here to deminish the devestation of the holocaust. All I'm here to do is question you all about the truth. I ask, what is the truth?
In my experiences, I have found that the truth is all in a matter of perspective. One person may see Topic A as being the truth in their favour, while another will see Topic A as being the truth in their favour. It all depends on the perspectives.
Another question I wish to raise is, how valid is ANY information on the internet? I find that most of the garbage I read online is utter crap! Yes you may even place this posting into that category if your perspectives deems it so.
For instance, a person killing people being cruel to animals may see his acts as a justified action. On the otherhand, the general public may see him as a monster, despite how much they like animals. Am I saying that either side is correct?
No.
But I am not saying that either side is correct either.
All I wish to do is raise these two questions:
1 is there such things as morals, or is it just a matter of perspective?
and
2 what is the truth? is it defined by any sect or group of people or is that too a matter of perspective?
The principals of right and wrong are universal. An individuals perspectives are based on life experiences and therefore influence how a person perceives a situation.
When a person acts on the morals they prioritize they have made a judgement based not on morals, but on their perspective and narrowness of view on reality. It is unfortunate that people are so quick to attempt change in others and so slow to realize the need for personal spiritual growth which promotes growth of a balanced perspective.
As for the truth; it is elusive to people that are narrow minded, unable to consider the possibility that what they believe to be truth could be incomplete.
The reason people have such a difficult time finding truth is that truth is multi-dimensional. Those who do not realize this are destructive to themselves and others due to their need to judge, attempting to empower themselves with self-righteousness.
It is not that people are necessarily evil intentionally. Our schools and churches do not teach us to question and explore dimension of fact because the ones with the facts do not want their truths to be questioned.
There is power in acting upon belief. Hopefully earth's inhabitants will learn that there is even more power in what is found in the quest for understanding.
There will never be peace on earth till the world reaches a much higher level of spirituality. Only then will we be able to perceive the dimensions of truth that exist beyond individual perspective.
Truth does not depend on perceptions. What do you find amusing about the holocaust? How can anyone trivialize the attempted genocide of a people which resulted in the brutal murder of some 6 million Jewish people? How do you question the truth? If it is true, it is correct, genuine and in accordance with facts. In other words, proven... The holocaust is a proven historical fact. So what is there to debate? Zundel, the nazi is a little off key you say, but that does'nt mean he is wrong. So, if he is not wrong - what is he? (a) right (b) confused (c) does'nt accept truth so invents his own perception or fantasy. He is not interested in seeking the truth- it is out there and can be found other than on the internet or media. According to an annual report released by the Tel-Aviv University, the Anti-Defamation League and the Jewish Agency, the number of anti-semitic attacks is on the decline but the severity of the violence continues to rise. Now, no moral values gives us people who have acquired a aberration behaviour type lifestyle. These people conceive babies for themselves through artificial insemination thus making biological ties for such children a complete blur. With no moral values, what the heck you say,- after all these babies can be viewed as just a commodity anyway. With no moral values sex and sexuality are not confined within boundaries of a wedding band so consensual relationships of any kind go, the more perverted the better right? After all, no values, no standards. Back away from the machine before it completely zundels your mind. Shalom.
You very confused person, I am sorry for you. You believe lie about the Jews, maybe you hate Chinese peoples too. If something is true it is true or not true does'nt matter what you make up to believe. If you get to no other peoples maybe you change or make up your mind for truth.
