<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  

Election Cartoons!

November 11 2000 at 9:55 AM
 

 
















 
 Respond to this message   
AuthorReply
Anonymous

Results Final in Florida

November 12 2000, 2:15 PM 





Democracy in Florida



Who did you vote for!? It was Bush, wasn't it?


 
 Respond to this message   
J.P. Huber

This would never happen in Canada

November 12 2000, 2:37 PM 

...well, almost never:

In late September, a 41-year-old Hamilton, Ontario, man was eating lunch with his family at a crowded restaurant after being fitted with a heart monitor by his cardiologist that morning. A customer at a neighboring table noticed the bulky outline and leather strap of the heart monitor and, mistaking it for a shoulder holster concealing a handgun, summoned police.

Shattering the moment of family togetherness, a team of SWAT-clad Canadian cops suddenly dashed to the man's table, grabbed him, and threw him up against the wall. One of the thugs tore off his shirt and was trying to pull out the monitor, which was hooked to the man's belt, when he finally realized it was actually some kind of medical device.

The Hamilton chief of police later apologized for the incident, explaining it was an honest mistake. The man lived, but his cardiologist was shocked at what the monitor had recorded for heart activity.

 
 Respond to this message   

In Canada get used to it

November 12 2000, 5:40 PM 

I don't know which country has the most corruption anymore. The Dems. rig an election as best they can and when it does'nt quite come off they change the plan to tie things up in the courts. This is the Kennedy party after all. The Clintons will just not leave. In Canada as in the U.S. the liberals control the media and muzzle the opposition. The difference is they even call themselves liberals in Canada. There are 4 socialist parties in Canada and one other party that the liberal media brands as rednecks. In both countries the truth is out there somewhere but you have to read between the lines to find it.

 
 Respond to this message   
J.P. Huber

There's Still Hope

November 12 2000, 6:16 PM 

There's still hope though...
Canada's elections are coming soon, and hopefully the mess is the US has enough voters charged to get out to the polls on election day and make a huge difference (so the same thing wont happen there as is happening here).

 
 Respond to this message   

guns and elections

November 13 2000, 3:32 PM 

Did you know that in the U.S. only 13 percent of break-ins take place when the owner is home? In Canada it is something like 45 percent. Expect a big increase if Gore gets in with his ban the gun agenda. Canada intends to register all guns. This is the direction the U.S. under Gore will go also. The reason for the increased house break-ins being so much higher (while owner is home) in Canada is: Not likely the owner will have a firearm to defend himself. I think Shawns update page points out the failing of selecting a president by other than popular vote why not check it out on this community members site for yourself.

 
 Respond to this message   

they taught him.

November 13 2000, 1:43 AM 

The left sure made sure HE'LL never rob a liquor store or murder a family. Sounds a lot like the Salam witch hunts. Which is what liberals are doing. But here instead of local SWAT they just call BATFMAN and shoot your family (like they did at Ruby Ridge, for example)...


 
 Respond to this message   

think again

November 13 2000, 1:35 AM 

Hey guy, which care to point out who ordered the events which lead to that photograph?

Please enlighten us.

 
 Respond to this message   
Anonymous

here's the punch line

November 13 2000, 3:11 AM 

In the picture (from a different situation than the one it is being used to portray, but in the same State) the guy with the gun was ordered there by Janet Reno, Attorney General of the Clinton-Gore regime. He (the gunman) bursts into a home in Florida looking for a child, kinda like the Gore camp is bursting into Florida whipping up hysteria about 19,000 misssing ballots (reports are now surfacing that they were lawfully and properly replaced when voters who made the mistake came out of the voting booth, requested and received replacement ballots) and wanting a three-count looking to find lost votes that'll make him the winner. It's called 'satire'. We don't keep holding election recounts in America until we get what we want for results, we hold elections to get a president (or so I, and most of the nation, thought when we voted last week). Do you get it now that it's been explained?

 
 Respond to this message   

no, really?

November 14 2000, 3:18 AM 

Thank you for making my point. And yes, we are all aware of the Cuban kid case. I posed it as a question so you could answer. The queston was sarcasm.

As you yourself stated, it was events orchestrated by Clinton and Reno, which is true. Yet your caption is against Bush - insinuating that Bush is trying to strong arm votes. At least that's how I took it.

 
 Respond to this message   
Anonymous

Actually, it's...

November 15 2000, 5:12 PM 

...it's supposed to depict the Dems bashing the Bush voters. You know - Batfman man on the loose again. (It's not Bush bashing)

 
 Respond to this message   

ok..

November 15 2000, 8:20 PM 

ok, now I am caught up with the rest of the class....

 
 Respond to this message   
Current Topic - Election Cartoons!
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  
Create your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2009 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement