Retail Store

Bigbore Ammo Now in Stock....9mm...308...45...and 50 caliber airgun ammunition
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Forum  

Hollowpoints effective?

November 4 2009 at 11:03 AM
  (Login wasilvers)
from IP address 216.170.136.138

Do hollowpoints still make a difference on big game with the slower speeds (relative to their powder pushed cousins) of airguns?

I know even a 22HP longs out of my rifle will make a big impact difference, but I haven't noticed any difference on the shots out of my airguns. Does it make more of a impact as the calibers get bigger in airguns? I see the same (usually better) expansion from the flat nose (hourglass shaped)pellets as the hollowpoint ones when testing on a phone book. The round-nose even have good flattening - but it is a phone book and not game.

Please exuse my ignorance of this.

Thanks, Will

 
 Respond to this message   
AuthorReply


(Premier Login rkmitchell)
Forum Owner
68.52.57.184

If they are dead-soft lead, they will mushroom.....

November 4 2009, 11:11 AM 

....but the harder alloys won't deform much. I still have the .457 425 grain slug I took out of an impala I shot at 50 yards. You could pretty much load it up and shoot it again, it just didn't deform. Those were Hunter's Supply bullets, and a harder allow than the hand-cast soft lead bullets we have started using.

The hard cast bullets can be very accurate, but for game taking, I like soft lead.

In smaller bores, you need to get the velocity up there before much deformation will occur....that, or hit a bone in the animal you shot.

Randy

http://www.adventuresinairguns.com

 
 Respond to this message   

(Login 2fazfou)
76.174.73.234

Agree with Randy. I notice a difference when i

November 4 2009, 12:12 PM 

shoot round nose bullets or pellets vs HP's. The HP's have more shock. I do like LIGHTER HP's in the big bores.

 
 Respond to this message   

(Login wasilvers)
216.170.136.138

Thanks

November 4 2009, 12:24 PM 

Thanks - that makes a sense.
Will

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login BlackHogDown)
4.227.117.8

Opinions vary.

November 4 2009, 6:09 PM 

For small bore I like Kodiak's.
Round nose with good B.C.
I'm a lot less concerned with a blood trail on small game.
I have used Crow mags at close range and consider them a close range specialty pellet.

For big bores a round nose slips in and slips out.
Good penetration but a smaller entry and exit hole.
I like a big flat nose bullet.
Entry and exit is going to be big whether it expands or not.
If I were to use a hollow I would want a heavy one.
When it expands you need the weight behind it to push it on through.

Just my .02 cents.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Butcherr)
24.21.111.100

the best HP's are the ones......

November 4 2009, 7:54 PM 

with cavities that comprise about 2/3's of the NOSE of the slug (like the Devastator round). Excessively deep cavities don't readily produce a flat face (meplat) upon expansion, and take longer to open up (if they open at all). Penetration suffers quite a bit from excessive cavity depth from what I have seen, and that was with minimal expansion/deformation.

This is what a hollowpoint is supposed to look like after it has expanded. No hole left.

[IMG][linked image][/IMG]

I like the idea of using a HP for small stuff where lots of penetration isn't wanted, or of any concern. The intrinsic accuracy of the hollowpoint also make for a nice target round.

For big game, nothing performs more reliably, and consistently than a WFN. It reliably travels a straight line (big advantage over a hollowpoint), often producing the highest wound channel volume. A WFN does the same thing pretty much every time, and leaves little to chance.

I think a hollowpoint used on big game needs to be a heavy one to assist penetration, with a cavity that isn't to deep.

Also, I see a lot of people showing pictures of slugs of all types shot into hard mediums that produce a lot of expansion, then people respond by saying "that will do a number on a deer/hog/what have you".

Hollowpoints shot into hard mediums like water (yes water is VERY hard on projectiles), dry books, steel plates, and rocks look impressive afterwards, but those mediums do a very poor job of replicating performance on an actual animal.

Completely (and I mean COMPLETELY) saturated phonebooks/newsprint is a universally available medium that gives one somewhat of an idea how a slug performs in flesh, though there are better mediums available for a $price$.


    
This message has been edited by Butcherr from IP address 24.21.111.100 on Nov 4, 2009 8:09 PM


 
 Respond to this message   

(Login neilmcp)
125.239.172.76

Funny you should mention phone books

November 5 2009, 12:01 PM 

A friend suggested then to me last week when I was searching for a suitable medium to test the HP's at distance. I have some soaking now and will shoot into them this weekend, weather permitting.
Cheers
Neil

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login BlackHogDown)
4.226.125.125

This works good.

November 5 2009, 12:56 PM 

[IMG][linked image][/IMG]

[IMG][linked image][/IMG]

[IMG][linked image][/IMG]

I have several of these.
The only bad thing is that in really hot weather 90-100 degrees it gets softer than it should be.
I haven't had to deal with extreme cold.
There is a ideal internal temp I believe it's around 70-78 degrees.
The tube will hold that temp for a good while unless temps are extreme.
After use you melt them down in a slow cooker and fill another tube.

 
 Respond to this message   


(Login Butcherr)
24.21.111.100

"bookmark every 75 pages or so....."

November 5 2009, 3:18 PM 

using sticks. That helps the phonebook get completely saturated all the way thru a lot faster.

It is amazing just how swelled-up those things get when truly waterlogged. Gotta add a lot of water to the bucket quite often.

 
 Respond to this message   
2fazfou
(Login 2fazfou)
76.174.73.234

.

November 5 2009, 11:43 AM 

.


    
This message has been edited by 2fazfou from IP address 76.174.73.234 on Nov 5, 2009 11:49 AM
This message has been edited by 2fazfou from IP address 76.174.73.234 on Nov 5, 2009 11:48 AM


 
 Respond to this message   
Current Topic - Hollowpoints effective?
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Forum