| Original Message |
Notta Chance (no login)
Posted Jan 6, 2006 9:41 AM
'You are absolutely correct Chicky.'
Talk about the pot calling the kettle black.
'I do have a new theory now, and that is that unbeknownst to the victim they had it coming.'
This is preposterous. An innocent person, going about his/her business, gets accosted and beaten by a bully for no reason other than the bully believes they had it coming. Do you hear yourself? Does a rape victim "have it coming"? Rapists have said as much in confession and/or trial, does that make them right and the victim wrong?
'My posts are based in behavioral science, what happens in the rest of the world. Let’s say 20 out of Harry’s class had miserable daily problems with school. That number I think is high, that is 4% of the total class. Meaning 96% are fine. Get over it.'
If 96% of priests are fine, does that excuse the 4% who molest alter boys? Did the alter boys 'have it coming'? Should those victims just 'get over it', or should the priests be put to justice - after all, it may have been 30 years ago too.
Your theory is absurd.
'D) Hides behind an anonymous post. Yep we got a troll!'
At least my thoughts are my own. You hide behind cute Photoshop jpegs and other peoples lyrics and video clips, then you lean on 'behavioral science' to support your insensitive viewpoint. Just because 96% (your math) of Hills students *didn't* pick on people doesn't excuse the 20 or so who did.
I'd rather be an anonymous 'troll' speaking the truth from the perspective of one who has been beaten and abused, than an apologist for the inexcusable behavior of those doing the abusing.
|
|
|
