Looks like the thread I posted this in has gone cold so I will just post it here for you wtk1. Please answer the question at the bottom of this post.

wtk1 lets look at the conversation again.

Steve said: I know of one deacon who has claimed: "We don't make mistakes."

Qwerty said: "But saying the second one it is hard to believe. If a ministry did say that I would call him a liar to his face. No person is free from mistakes, free from sin I can believe it, mistakes, never!"

wtk1 said: "Qwerty. I'm not saying that some Ministers don't think that way. Only that not all do. There have been many a minister that He himself had to go through a wash for getting to high minded."

Qwerty said: "You have ministers in the H that think they "We don't make mistakes". You can't be serious? You are saying that many of your ministers have got to high minded? So high minded they had to have to be wash (in the blood I am guessing)?"

wtk1 said: "Now I remember what kind of person you are qwerty, contentious. I remember trying to talk to you before. You would always challenge everybody on everything.

I think you are jumping the gun there a bit wtk1. As you note all my three statements were with a question mark.

>>>That's not what I said, I said some ministers get high minded and need help. Not a lot."

No you didn't say "some" you said "many". Now you may have worded it wrong or some thing but that is what you did say. And you didn't say need help you said "and to go through a wash."

I asked you want you meant by go though a wash, I asked if you were serious if you have H ministers that think they don't make mistakes, and I asked you if you were saying that many of your ministers have got to high minded.

Now could you tell me what is contentious about that the questions I asked. I asked 3 simple questions and you tell me I am contentious?

Qwerty, I'm with you one this one. Well, I should say, you are a little contentious, but is it in kind of a sweet way (not sure if you like that or not, I know I wouldn't) But wtk is contentious in the way of, well, like if you tried to pull a starving wolverine out of your garbage can by the tail.

Hey to give WTK credit, he said something nice to me the other day!

Yea Scott, you only think that way because am a H. If I weren't you would think the meaner a guy can be the funner He is. But thats OK. I know I can be contentious at times. I'll try to work on it so you don't get you feelings hurt.

Just my 2 cents here, but I have to side with wtk's analysis of Qwerty as a contentious person.  The very fact that he had to bring this topic up again in another thread, rather than just letting it go, shows the essence of his contentiousness.  What else beside contentiousness would motivate him to re-open the topic?

Anyone that has monitored this board for more than a week knows that Qwerty is argumentative on just about every post.  He truly seems to live for an argument (maybe he calls it a discussion, but have you ever noticed that he never gives in or loses?).  It's all about his beliefs and ideas.  Not learning.  Not sharing.  Just the Gospel According to Qwerty.