Sir, There was a 20 day interval between the date I first posted this and until I bumped it to the top again.
Here's another chance to respectfully answer my question:
*Forreal, I didn't understand your conviction on the avoidance in this post to Cupcake:
"Cupcake: In response to the segregated sitting pushed upon you by a minister. Not totally knowing all the complexities of your situation but I'll venture a quess. The minister that approached you was very likely passing the buck, if you could confront the laity that supposedly had issues about K sitting with everyone else, they in turn will say it was the minister that was insisting on this. Probably a fair share of H struggle with the avoidance issue and how it is practiced, both pro and con but few will actually step up and take personal responsibility for it. I know very well the group think mentality taking place in these situations. Carry on, Cupcake!"
Forreal, Can you explain how it should be scripturally practiced? How do you "take personal responsibility" for the avoidance?
If this is Jesus' example to show love to the expelled, then I guess Cupcake and other wives like her certainly do not love their husbands very much if they are not willing to practice it in everyday life.
According to this example of Jesus, Cupcake is allowing someone else to show MORE love to her husband than she does.*
If your reluctance to reply is due to the fact that you are not a H member in good standing, OR are not even H at all, then I can see why this would be extremely difficult for you.
Thank You, Sir.
|