CHRIS CRAFT COMMANDER FORUM ® .......A photo-intensive technical reference file and ongoing newsletter regarding the original fiberglass Chris Craft Commander. Our mission at this independent not-for-profit non-commercial web site is to "have fun and share information" for your individual personal use. Our main reference feature is the ever expanding MASTER INDEX Files which contain exhaustive photo and technical information on the Chris Craft Commander line (like these original brochure scans, featuring the iconic 38 Commander designed by Fred Hudson) , (an awesome collection of Chris Craft 427 tuning and specification information), and a few words about how to use the information in the forum, etc. Be sure to look at the information about the 2009 Lake Erie Chris Craft Commander / Roamer Rendezvous, second year in a row at Huron, Ohio, held in August of 2009 !! If you're a Commander fan, this will be an event you won't want to miss next time around.

We extend to you a cordial "WELCOME ABOARD !"

This forum is registered as chriscraftcommander.com

 Return to index  

13 x 13 RH

May 21 2007 at 9:42 AM
Paul  (no login)


Response to Prop

Hi Rickard,

I'm not sure what prop is the factory spec, but a 13 x 13 was in the boat at the time it arrived here in Nashville. The HF7D Paragon is a direct drive unit, so the rpm of the prop would be the same as the engine speed. With 210-hp and a 13 x 13 spinning at 4000 rpm that equates to an unrealistic 49-mph in theory without slippage, take out 15% slippage for this particular deep v hull and that results in a realistic 41-mph speed with that prop.

Factory speed ratings were published at 38-mph with the 210-hp 327F and 36-mph with the 283 185-hp. Since this boat has a higher compression block than the original 8.0:1 of the stock 327F and the minimum power for that compression was 250-hp, I also have a cupped 13 x 14 speed prop I'm going to try. I think it's possible to get a little more speed, but clearly this is not a speed hull due to the deep V, it's a soft ride hull. Because of the additional wetted area of a deep v compared to a generally flat bottom design, the deep v always takes more power to reach a given speed (increased drag). I don't know the true power of this boat due to the fact that it has a higher compression automotive block. If power is in the 250-hp range, I may be able to exceed 45-mph with that 13 x 14 cupped prop. Otherwise it may just serve as a comfortable mid range cruising prop. For water skiing I'll probably stick with the 13 x 13.

The interesting thing is, a deep v is frequently the faster boat because of conditions. In anything more than a mild chop, my 1950s speedboats have to throttle down or pound. In conditions like this a deep v will just blast right on by.

If you can give me the weight, power, gear reduction, and prop, I'll run some calculations for you just to see what they say.

Regards,
Paul

 
 Respond to this message   
Responses

Contact the Chris Craft Commander Forum
chriscraftcommander@hotmail.com

©2005, ©2006, ©2007, ©2008, ©2009, Chris-Craft Commander Forum, Inc., ®, also known as ChrisCraftCommander.com. Information and intellectual property on this not-for-profit non-commercial site may be copied for individual personal use, but any other reproduction or use requires written approval. Any entity who mines this site for names, material, or their other commercial/financial benefit in any way is subject to copyright and intellectual property law; the integrity of this site will be aggressively protected. The material here is for indivudual personal use and is not to be sold. Chris Craft is a registered trademark of Chris-Craft. Neither Chris-Craft nor any subsidiaries of Chris-Craft shall bear any responsibility for the chriscraftcommander.com content, comments, or advertising. Chris Craft Commander Forum, Inc., is independent from Chris Craft Corporation, the Chris Craft Commander Club, any other entities, and is not affiliated with, sponsored or supported by those organizations in any way. Copyright/trademark/sales mark infringements are not intended, or implied.