Our troops today

have what is called an m -4 as a combat weapon.This is not a question of what you or I might have argued years ago.If I and YOU would be in combat today.A 7.62 NATO type round {or sporting equivalent of the 30:06} vs .226 hornet of the m-16. This new contoversy is more than that of caliber,range and accuracy.It is about functionality.Does the Colt M-4 actually perform under combat conditions to the point where troops have confidence in it.Since there are obvious concerns about leadership and chain of command top to bottom.Especially top.To have functional concerns about even the weapon in your hands.This makes our troups extremely vulnerable in the sands of soon to be radioactive Arabia.If I were Alfred E. Nobody and soon to be civilian court under investigation ex government official and ex presidentee.I would lend an ear to the arguement ,mosst especially after 4,000 plus deaths in the service of my assinine"While Bin Laden walks free!KMA,you fuks!