Compare my sighting and my take on it

by Murph

 

with anyone you like.However in 1972 I saw up close a male and female Bigfoot together out in the open.Both of them were white.That was about the only physical similarity they shared.The male was very tall with very wide shoulders, powerful looking but not overly muscled.The shoulders were so wide it made his head look small.His facial features were human like in just about every way but odd at the same time.The hair on him was rather sparse,especially on his face at over all looked rather dry and weatherbeaten but clean.The female was rather more fleshy,if not actually plump and had longer,thicker & sleeker white hair.Oddly her face including eye nose and mouth was not visable thru it. My conclusions from this sighting were that she was accustomed to a much colder micro climate than the male.Which led to the conclusion that he and not she did most of the hunter gatherings.Also the fact that a river was close by in the direction they were coming from.Led to the conclusion that the river and not the woods was their path of travel.I felt they could not look as clean as they did traveling thru the countryside of weeds,brush and downed trees,etc! Many years would pass before I would try to get another sighting although many strange things found in other woodlands began to get looked at in a new way.When ever a new unknown or unfamiliar creature like a cougar or wolverine appears.Suddenly once puzzling tracks,glimpses and other clues begin to add up. This sighting is important to me because it is true.When I see similar things from other prople sightings I believe those above all else.It is only natural.

Posted on Aug 17, 2008, 12:40 PM
from IP address 69.179.119.91

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home

Create your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2009 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement  
Click Her to Return To The Minnesota Bigfoot Web-site