Thank you Anonymous

Now,I wonder if anyone ever heard of the footcast collectors out there ever considered something about the different shapes of the feet.That THING is this..what if the male and female having different shapes,hair lengths and sheen, their bodies sizes and facial coverage.Well MIGHT not these kinds of differences also extend to the feet? Because maybe THAT is why there are different shapes to the feet.Sexually di morphic differences to other areas of their bodies could well extend to the feet just as well.Especially so if they do different chores in different micro climates,like one hunting and one not.One spending more time in cooler caves or burrows.Or one walking thru forests and one retreating far back into the ice covered floor areas of our northern sandstone caves,etc.Just thought I'd bring it up,because if they haven't thought of it,maybe they should.If it were proven,then knowing where the females venture ,rather than the far ranging males.It could make the search a lot easier over time.