Footseee I agree on Gimlin/Patterson

by Murph

 

However the fact remains that aside from the big hooters.They were right on on the general shape of a female Bigfoot.So one of them just might have had an encounter. Or believed someone who did.Why they didn't complete the hoax by covering the entire face could have a couple of possibilties.Either the left coast weather,or a gross misstep on their part.I think they must have at least conferred with a REAL sightee as to the basic shape of the costume.To hoax a real male would be near impossible for someone who has never seen one.The wannabees at BFRO and etc,are so far off the trail they will never be found! I wish them luck tho!Luck to everyone one actually who will end up confirming my descriptions and photos.

Posted on Nov 26, 2008, 8:56 PM
from IP address 72.160.237.83

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home

Create your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2009 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement  
Click Her to Return To The Minnesota Bigfoot Web-site