Respond to this messageReturn to Index
Original Message
  • Footseee I agree on Gimlin/Patterson
    • Murph
      Posted Nov 26, 2008 8:56 PM

      However the fact remains that aside from the big hooters.They were right on on the general shape of a female Bigfoot.So one of them just might have had an encounter. Or believed someone who did.Why they didn't complete the hoax by covering the entire face could have a couple of possibilties.Either the left coast weather,or a gross misstep on their part.I think they must have at least conferred with a REAL sightee as to the basic shape of the costume.To hoax a real male would be near impossible for someone who has never seen one.The wannabees at BFRO and etc,are so far off the trail they will never be found! I wish them luck tho!Luck to everyone one actually who will end up confirming my descriptions and photos.
    Your Name
    Your Email
    (Optional)
    Message Title
    Message Text
    Options Also send responses to my email address
          


    Create your own forum at Network54
     Copyright © 1999-2009 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement  
    Click Her to Return To The Minnesota Bigfoot Web-site