An interesting mix of ideas...I agree with a number of his points, particularly making Congress live like the rest of us. I take issue with at least two things, however.
He said, "put the election of the president back in the hands of we the people" by abolishing the electoral college. You can't put something back that was a) never there, the electoral college is as old as the presidency; and b) was never taken away, even with the electoral college, we the people still vote and determine a president, just under a different set of rules than a direct, simple majority election. There must be some way of determining who wins. Even a simple election isn't necessarily simple. At the very least, we would have to answer the question, does the winner require a majority, or merely a plurality?
He also said "bring back universal service." When did we ever have universal service? We had a draft, but it never applied to females, so there was never universal service. Universal service is universal tyranny. The concept assumes that only people working for the government are serving others. Actually, everyone that holds down a job serves others. Universal service? How about, get a job! Or, if a man will not work, he must not eat.
![[linked image]](http://i78.photobucket.com/albums/j115/tim1859/signature.jpg)