macedonia[antartiko]: Talat: Greek Cyprus’ accession to NATO ‘intolerable’

This is the Antartiko Discussion forum where everyone can post messages to each other. Express your thoughts in a civilized manner If you swear you will be banned................................................................ Read footer at bottom of page................................................................................................................... antartiko_florina@yahoo.com

<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>

Return to Forum

Talat: Greek Cyprus’ accession to NATO ‘intolerable’ November 6 2009 at 10:38 PM No score for this post		Turkish Cypriot side, cannot tolerate the inc (no login)

Talat: Greek Cyprus accession to NATO intolerable Meanwhile, Talat said this week that the Turkish Cypriots would oppose a possible Greek Cypriot accession to NATO, in comments on EU criticism last month against Turkey that it is blocking EU-NATO military cooperation due to concerns over Cyprus. We know that the EU gives great importance to NATO and that it relies on the general security provided by NATO, Talat said after meeting with EU Enlargement Commissioner Olli Rehn in Brussels on Thursday. However, nobody should forget that the Turkish Cypriots and Turkey, which supports the Turkish Cypriot side, cannot tolerate the inclusion of the Greek Cypriot army in NATO. It would pose a serious security threat against us. Accepting this would be a kind of suicide. 07 November 2009, Saturday TODAY'S ZAMAN WITH WIRES ANKARA

Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.

Respond to this message

Current Topic - Talat: Greek Cyprus’ accession to NATO ‘intolerable’

<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>

Return to Forum

Find more forums on Politics

Create your own forum at Network54

...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

..... Who populated the lands of modern FYROM in the past? The ancient people inhabiting the area around Skopje, at the time of the ancient Macedonians, were the Dardanians, and their land was called Dardania. Throughout their modern history, the region now occupied by FYROM was populated mostly by Bulgarians. The creation of "Macedonia" (FYROM, SROM) was artificial. Ex-Yugoslavs will attest to that. FYROM is comprised of Albanians, Serbs, and Bulgarians and their language is a Bulgarian dialect with a few Serbo-croatian words. Bulgarians will attest to that and understand/speak "Macedonian". 8) What about their claim of a large minority in Greece? After usurping the name and the flag, surprise! They start claiming that Greeks in Macedonia (Greek) are a FYROM minority. After all we all identify as Macedonians. Thus, we must be the same... Some people in the Net claim 1 mill minority in Macedonia (Greek). The population of Macedonia (Greek) is 2 mill. I am a Macedonian (Greek) same with other Greeks on this group. We don't want anything to have with FYROM. We are Greek. Finally the recent Euro-Elections revealed only with their cause (therefore propably a FYROM minority) 10,000! Not fantasies of 1 million! 9) Why doesn't the Greek government recognize the "Macedonian" minority? Greek parents have been sending their children to Macedonian schools for years, expecting them to learn Greek, not Bulgarian. Macedonian people (Greeks) are already a majority in Greece, with Macedonian churches, schools and cultural centers teaching Greek and regional dances and songs. The Greek government can neither recognize a minority with the same name, as the majority, nor build non-Greek schools and churches with the same name. Greek courts have offered to open cultural centers for their minority, under a different name (than Macedonian). They have refused. As long as they use the term "Macedonian" to describe their nationality, their minorities in Greece and Bulgaria cannot be recognized. 10) What are Greece's objections with FYROM's constitution? There are two points of concern: In their preamble, they define their FYROM state as a departure from the " ...historic decisions of the Anti-Fascist Assembly of the People's Liberation of Macedonia (ASNOM)... ". The problem is that ASNOM had called for the "Macedonians" in Bulgaria and other countries to unite under Tito's rule. Their language in article 49 is also problematic (too extensive to go into here). At Greece's request they have added 2 amendements stating that they have no claims on neighbouring countries. Still, that is in contradiction with their preample, and it is to their benefit to rewrite those articles to avoid contradictions and vagueries in their Constitution. 11) Does Greece have any territorial or other claims on FYROM? In 1993, Serbia's President Milocevic, invited Greece to invade FYROM. Greece declined it. FYROM is surrounded by claims of Greater Albania, Greater Bulgaria and Greater Serbia. Greece is the only one not interested in FYROM. It is a poor, barren place with no Hellenic ties or history. Greece has the beach-front property (Aegean), and the economy differential between the two countries would only create problems for the richer one (Greece). 12) Is Greece really afraid of FYROM? Presently FYROM is too weak to threaten Greece militarily or otherwise. However, considering that: a) A general draft can raise an army of 700,000 in FYROM; b) Greece has had to fight several times against similar claims in this century to secure and defend its northern region (Macedonia); c) the Balkans are currently in a map-changing mode; d) shifting alliances may change the balance of power in the near future; The Greek state feels that the "inexplicable" adoption of an irredentist name and flag by FYROM are hostile and provocative acts designed to establish future claims on Greek Macedonia. These are the main points and we can support them with facts and evidence...............................................