I'm leaning towards Merlin. It sure would be helpful to know the size, since there's a noticeable difference between the two species. Also, I'll bet if you were thinking Merlin when you first saw it, that was probably a conscious or maybe subconscious reaction to the size and heft of it. If it had been a Peregrine, you'd have been thinking, wow, that's a big falcon!
Something about the proportions says Merlin to me. Merlins, I think, have a larger head compared with the body, and a rounder look to the head. If we knew the wing projection compared with the tail, that would be helpful, but I don't think any of the photos conclusively shows the wing length relative to the tail length. In that last photo, where you can see the wingtips, I think it is pretty much an optical illusion making that wing appear as long as it does. I think the tail is going back in one direction, and that wing that looks long is being viewed more in profile, giving the illusion of being as long as the tail. That's of course just an opinion, but one based on years of having to interpret photos as a field guide artist. I could be totally wrong, but that's how I'm reading that photo.
Also, if it were a Peregrine, I think the face would appear much more contrasting in pattern. Take a look at the area behind the "moustache" mark. Does it seem a bit darker than white to you? It does to me. If that's so, it would imply lots of streaking in that area, which is characteristic of a Merlin. A Peregrine would be straight white (or off-white, actually). Given the lighting, if it were a Peregrine, I think the "cheeks" would appear more gleaming white, and the "moustache" way darker. I'll admit that the photo does seem to show a strong "moustache" for a Merlin, but I think it would be far stronger if it were a Peregrine. I'm looking at the National Geographic Guide, and I think those illustrations show that malar mark to be way too subtle in the Merlin. Merlins really do have that mark, it's just not nearly as bold as the Peregrine.
Here's some illustrations. They're copyrighted by me and the publisher, so no one should use them or risk getting in serious trouble with Princeton U. Press.
I hope these help...(I've shown them to scale)