Home > Discussion Groups > Japanese Modelling

Message posting guidelines:
1.

Full real names must be used at all times.

2.
A valid e-mail address must be provided. (This is not optional)
3.
Images must be posted at low resolution (72 dpi) and no larger than 760 pixels wide, and copyright/trade mark owners must be credited whenever reasonably possible.
4. From 1 November, registration is compulsory if you wish to post on this Japanese Modelling Discussion Group. For further information, please see the following message: http://www.network54.com/Forum/449919/message/1130495649/Compulsory+Registration+on+Discussion+Groups
Please read our Community guidelines before posting.
By contributing to this discussion group, you indicate your agreement to the Terms and Conditions of Use.
Posts that violate the guidelines or Terms and conditions of Use of the Missing-lynx.com discussion groups will be erased, and repeated violation of this policy may result in termination of the violator's account.
Japanese translation service

 Return to Index  

DIfferent paint practice?

July 2 2011 at 1:48 PM
  (Login Steve.Zaloga)
MODERATORS ONLY - Allied WWII
from IP address 173.245.52.245


Response to Ka-Mi-steries...

I think that it is possible that the interior color scheme changed during production. Maybe the hull interior was painted differently than the turret? It is also possible that the Ka-Mi had some light interior color other than white, maybe based on IJN warship practices. For example, the US Navy used a pale green color for interiors on warships. I don't know what the IJN practice was during the war. Maybe there was an interior color other than white? Maybe a primer? I don't know.

The photo I posted earlier of the cutaway Ka-Mi from APG is odd because of the lighting. They placed electric lights inside the hull. This is why the fighting compartment and turret appear so bright but the rear compartment is darker. The front compartment is very dark as the cut-away was made into the pontoon, not the fighting compartment, and so was not lit at all. I still think this shows a very light color being used for the interior

Here's a few more photos, this time from Ka-Mis on Luzon. The hatch interior looks light, but this is probably from the lighting, not the paint color.

So far, I have not found the main APG evaluation report about the Ka-Mi at NARA, only some scattered photos in the combat collections and the APG collections. Maybe I will have more luck next time at NARA.

[linked image]
[linked image]

 
 Respond to this message   
Responses

  1. Another Saipan pic - Steve Zaloga on Jul 2, 4:38 PM
    1. Wow! - Peter Rathgeb on Jul 2, 4:58 PM
      1. Shimushu Ka-Mi - Steve Zaloga on Jul 2, 6:12 PM
        1. Shimushu Ka-Mi - Peter Rathgeb on Jul 2, 6:16 PM
          1. Target range - Steve Zaloga on Jul 2, 7:12 PM
            1. This would explain that. Thanks. n/t - Peter Rathgeb on Jul 3, 4:33 AM
     


Terms and Conditions of Use
Report abuse