|
weak under 17'sMarch 20 2007 at 12:53 AM | anon (no login) |
| To me the under 17's looks like a weak age group and apart from alex ingham i dont really see any1 who is particulary strong, especially when you compare it against the under 19's.
|
|
| Author | Reply |
anon
(no login) | Re: weak under 17's | March 20 2007, 2:00 PM |
agree. U15's is strong and all the talk before about U13's being weak is rubbish... U17 is the weak group
|
|
Anonymous
(no login) | Re: weak under 17's | March 20 2007, 2:03 PM |
The under 19's are very strong, all of the top 10 have massive pontential
|
|
anon
(no login) | Re: weak under 17's | March 20 2007, 4:49 PM |
Under 17 GIRLS are quite strong.
|
|
Anonymous
(no login) | Re: weak under 17's | March 20 2007, 6:29 PM |
if u go back like 4 ,months though the 17's was the strongest age group with joe lee, adrian waller, ingham, murrills, wileman, wykes, molyneux, hibberds, dixon. about 6 of them r currently in the top 15 in england in the U19's!! now however, the U17's has weakened in depth due to some of them droppin out and the only ones left from that generation r ingham, murrills, hibberds and dixon.
|
|
anonymous
(no login) | Re: weak under 17's | March 20 2007, 7:51 PM |
The u17 girls are quite strong...
| |
|
| Current Topic - weak under 17's |
|
|