I don't use links when I don't need them

P> You say there's a "scientific law of causality." Prove it.

N> I don't have to ...You use it yourself but ONLY when it benefits your false philosophy.

P> You say evolution has to do with the origin of life. Prove it.

N> I didn't say such a thing. What I did say is that evolutionists are ignoring the science of it.

The are two competing models on the Origin of Life science.

1. The Macro-evolutionary model states that life was SELF-GENERATED from NON-LIVING INORGANIC MATTER. IOW Once the gap from NON-LIFE to LIFE was bridged, the first LIVING cell began to evolve by RANDOM CHANGES (mutations) in its generic information system, creating new characteristics that were not in the original organism.

2. The DESIGN MODEL states that NON-LIFE "NEVER" produces LIFE, and that the FIRST LIFE FORMS were the direct result of a SUPER-INTELLIGENCE.

You've ALREADY stated that you DON'T BELIEVE in spontaneous generation Phred so you are now forced to contradict yourself as usual.

I don't need to rant to prove anything Phred. You already disagree with the macro-evolutionary model is NOT ACCEPTED by you. I would rather watch you dance the fool dance. You're a joke.


“All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.”~~~~Edmund Burke