You aren't spiritually minded enough

to understand scripture, much less what the forty days and nights means.

Regardless of the truth behind the scripture, you have no proof to back your statement that there was no flood. Pure speculation on your part, as well as what animals you think might have been around during that time. It doesn't matter if there was a flood or not. The fact is you can't prove it one way or the other. Is this the way you always reason? If so, not impressed.