| Original Message |
JVH (^_^) (no login)
Posted May 8, 2009 2:38 AM
I'm not Chad Docterman, so, it's rather silly to address me about it. I mean, really, for all you know I might not even agree with the content of the article and merely have posted it for those interested, and evidently you are. Well, mission accomplished then. 
Anyway, when you want to refute, all you need to do is to refute the central point. This means you have to identify the central point and commit explicitly to it. If you can't find the central point, you have nothing to refute, and you are arguing with a straw man.
So, find the central point, if you can, and refute it, if you can. If you can't, don't bother - it will lead to nothing. After all, religious reasoning is hopelessly flawed - due to the use of premises unsound.
Everything I say is literally true, except when not
|
|
|