Home > Discussion Groups > Allied

Message posting guidelines:
1.

Full real names must be used at all times.

2.
A valid e-mail address must be provided. (This is not optional)
3.
Images must be posted at low resolution (72 dpi) and no larger than 760 pixels wide, and copyright/trade mark owners must be credited whenever reasonably possible.
4.

From 20 April, registration is compulsory if you wish to post messages on the Discussion Groups. For further information, please see the following message: http://www.network54.com/Forum/message?forumid=47208&messageid=1113823018

Please read our Community guidelines before posting.
By contributing to this discussion group, you indicate your agreement to the Terms and Conditions of Use.
Posts that violate the guidelines or Terms and conditions of Use of the Missing-lynx.com discussion groups will be erased, and repeated violation of this policy may result in termination of the violator's account.

Advertisement

 Return to Index  

Re: How bad are the DML Valentine and Bishop

July 4 2009 at 9:39 AM
Ray Gustafson  (Login bluemirror)
Missing-Lynx members
from IP address 70.224.40.137


Response to How bad are the DML Valentine and Bishop

With some TLC, new tracks, and barrel they are okay. There are HUGE sink marks in the suspension components and the overall scale size of the smaller parts are clunky and benefit from scratch replacements. These kits are a lot of work if one is accustomed to building, say, newer Dragon or Tamiya kits but - that said - they look the business when completed.

The Valentine is certainly ripe for a new tool iteration. Heres hoping Bronco, Dragon or Tasca will take them on.

 
 Respond to this message   


Terms and Conditions of Use
Report abuse