SCOTT,
I hear ya brother... I'm in your Corner. As a Germ-a-holic I'm disscusted with th Fact that Dragon's Price VS. Accuracy ! not just on Authentication, but simple fit !! If your gonna Charge a Premium $$ why not justify it by Goin th X-Tra mile & make sure it simply Fits well ?? With that SAID.....
SCOTT : I own both of C.H./DML's STZ kits (6355) & (6388) and have Put off building both because of posts & reviews such as this one... So... I too an eager to Know if they've revised th Hull/Lower Hull fit !! ala Their Pz IV E debackle !!
Also... with CyberHobby/Dragon's recent announcement of their T-34 Flak Vierling Kit...
http://www.dragonusaonline.com/item_detail.aspx?ItemCode=CHC6569
is this kit based on Th same Hull/Lower Hull kits ?? Is this what i have to look forward too?? It REALLY Is dishearting to get geared up to build a Kit only to find out half way into th Build that you now Must Devote Countless hours into simple research of th Construction of th Real Tank...(above the Regular Research WE all put into a Model before We build it) to find that DRAGON has Fu#@ed you !!!
But th real reason for MY Post is.. are th 2 STZ kits that I have Contain th Same Problems ??
and KURT ... Man... you live for th Argument don't you.... you should've become a Lawyer !
Yeah i Said T-34 ... i don't Care If there is An American Trainer Plane with that Designation.... Thats not What We're talking about here ... so I think WE All know what we mean when we say T34 or T-34 !! or even Tee Thirty-Four .....
Scott...thanx for you input to My delima !!! Thanx in Advance !!
ERIK
WHAT DO YOU CALL THE ASSASSINS THAT ACCUSE THE ASSASSIN???