Home > Discussion Groups > Allied

Message posting guidelines:
1.

Full real names must be used at all times.

2.
A valid e-mail address must be provided. (This is not optional)
3.
Images must be posted at low resolution (72 dpi) and no larger than 760 pixels wide, and copyright/trade mark owners must be credited whenever reasonably possible.
4.

From 20 April, registration is compulsory if you wish to post messages on the Discussion Groups. For further information, please see the following message: http://www.network54.com/Forum/message?forumid=47208&messageid=1113823018

Please read our Community guidelines before posting.
By contributing to this discussion group, you indicate your agreement to the Terms and Conditions of Use.
Posts that violate the guidelines or Terms and conditions of Use of the Missing-lynx.com discussion groups will be erased, and repeated violation of this policy may result in termination of the violator's account.

Advertisement

 Return to Index  

Casual Observer ! With Both STZ Kits from C.H.DML.

July 8 2009 at 12:19 AM
ERIK ROBERSON  (Login panzervor)
Missing-Lynx members
from IP address 76.104.17.74


Response to Re: Did you miss it?

SCOTT,

I hear ya brother... I'm in your Corner. As a Germ-a-holic I'm disscusted with th Fact that Dragon's Price VS. Accuracy ! not just on Authentication, but simple fit !! If your gonna Charge a Premium $$ why not justify it by Goin th X-Tra mile & make sure it simply Fits well ?? With that SAID.....

SCOTT : I own both of C.H./DML's STZ kits (6355) & (6388) and have Put off building both because of posts & reviews such as this one... So... I too an eager to Know if they've revised th Hull/Lower Hull fit !! ala Their Pz IV E debackle !!

Also... with CyberHobby/Dragon's recent announcement of their T-34 Flak Vierling Kit...

http://www.dragonusaonline.com/item_detail.aspx?ItemCode=CHC6569
is this kit based on Th same Hull/Lower Hull kits ?? Is this what i have to look forward too?? It REALLY Is dishearting to get geared up to build a Kit only to find out half way into th Build that you now Must Devote Countless hours into simple research of th Construction of th Real Tank...(above the Regular Research WE all put into a Model before We build it) to find that DRAGON has Fu#@ed you !!!

But th real reason for MY Post is.. are th 2 STZ kits that I have Contain th Same Problems ??


and KURT ... Man... you live for th Argument don't you.... you should've become a Lawyer ! happy.gif

Yeah i Said T-34 ... i don't Care If there is An American Trainer Plane with that Designation.... Thats not What We're talking about here ... so I think WE All know what we mean when we say T34 or T-34 !! or even Tee Thirty-Four .....

Scott...thanx for you input to My delima !!! Thanx in Advance !!

ERIK

small bulge pic

WHAT DO YOU CALL THE ASSASSINS THAT ACCUSE THE ASSASSIN???


    
This message has been edited by panzervor from IP address 76.104.17.74 on Jul 8, 2009 12:27 AM
This message has been edited by panzervor from IP address 76.104.17.74 on Jul 8, 2009 12:27 AM


 
 Respond to this message   
Responses

  1. Re: Casual Observer ! With Both STZ Kits from C.H.DML. - Mark Rethoret on Jul 8, 2:30 AM
  2.  
  3. Flak (?) on Beute - Scott Fraser on Jul 8, 6:42 AM
    1. Its not an STZ hull kit nt - david nickels on Jul 8, 12:25 PM
     


Terms and Conditions of Use
Report abuse