Home > Discussion Groups > Allied

Message posting guidelines:

Full real names must be used at all times.

A valid e-mail address must be provided. (This is not optional)
Images must be posted at low resolution (72 dpi) and no larger than 760 pixels wide, and copyright/trade mark owners must be credited whenever reasonably possible.

From 20 April, registration is compulsory if you wish to post messages on the Discussion Groups. For further information, please see the following message: http://www.network54.com/Forum/message?forumid=47208&messageid=1113823018

Please read our Community guidelines before posting.
By contributing to this discussion group, you indicate your agreement to the Terms and Conditions of Use.
Posts that violate the guidelines or Terms and conditions of Use of the Missing-lynx.com discussion groups will be erased, and repeated violation of this policy may result in termination of the violator's account.


 Return to Index  

Interesting new Allied figure set from new company

October 18 2011 at 8:25 AM
  (Login chicoutimi)
Missing-Lynx members
from IP address

Saw this on the PMMS this morning:


With just a little tweaking and a new head, the Horrocks figure could also be made into a convincing Bradley. wink.gif


Hervé "Charby" Charbonneau
Chicoutimi QC

You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity. (Bullet Tooth Tony)

 Respond to this message   

  1. That's the problem - Roger Cockburn on Oct 18, 11:03 AM
  3. Not Edward Fox either - Robert E. Potter, Jr. on Oct 18, 11:46 AM
    1. If you are old enough.. - Adrian Camp on Oct 18, 12:15 PM
      1. If you do find this series, . . . - Robert E. Potter, Jr. on Oct 19, 12:18 PM
  4. Likenesses Difficult in 1/35th - Rob Ervin on Oct 18, 2:14 PM
  6. What?!!! Monty not holding a tea cup? - Cliff Leverette on Oct 18, 2:58 PM
    1. Cliff, Cliff, Cliff.... - Dave Williams on Oct 18, 5:08 PM
      1. Monty with tea cup - Paul (Tanks) James on Oct 18, 5:39 PM
        1. Horrocks? - Richard Woods on Oct 19, 5:54 AM
          1. Re: Horrocks? - Chris Meddings on Oct 19, 6:36 AM
            1. Horrocks height - FranK Blanton on Oct 19, 10:01 AM
          2. Traditionally, in the West ... - Paul Roberts on Oct 19, 10:11 AM
            1. Whoever it is; it's not Horrocks. - Richard Woods on Oct 19, 11:48 AM
            2. Uniformity... - Robert Lockie on Oct 20, 10:13 AM
  7. New heads & uses - Howard Robins on Oct 19, 12:33 PM

Terms and Conditions of Use
Report abuse