Home > Discussion Groups > Allied

Message posting guidelines:
1.

Full real names must be used at all times.

2.
A valid e-mail address must be provided. (This is not optional)
3.
Images must be posted at low resolution (72 dpi) and no larger than 760 pixels wide, and copyright/trade mark owners must be credited whenever reasonably possible.
4.

From 20 April, registration is compulsory if you wish to post messages on the Discussion Groups. For further information, please see the following message: http://www.network54.com/Forum/message?forumid=47208&messageid=1113823018

Please read our Community guidelines before posting.
By contributing to this discussion group, you indicate your agreement to the Terms and Conditions of Use.
Posts that violate the guidelines or Terms and conditions of Use of the Missing-lynx.com discussion groups will be erased, and repeated violation of this policy may result in termination of the violator's account.

Advertisement

  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  

Churchill AVRE on Juno Beach : which mark ?

September 21 2011 at 1:52 PM
Patrick Bernier  (Login Pat-bernier)
Missing-Lynx members
from IP address 206.172.6.14

I would like to build a Churchill AVRE as used on Juno Beach.
Which kit should I use : mkIII (AFV Club 35167) or mk. IV (AFV Club 35169).

thanks
Pat


 
 Respond to this message   
AuthorReply
Roy Stevens
(Login rcstevens)
Missing-Lynx members
64.235.102.2

Juno Churchill AVRE

September 21 2011, 2:13 PM 

The one that's still behind the dunes is a Mk. IV and all photos I've seen of Chuchill AVREs around the Canadian landing sites in Summer 1944 were also Mk. IVs. The Mk. III was pretty rare.

HTH,
Roy

 
 Respond to this message   
John Tapsell
(Login John_Tapsell)
Missing-Lynx members
86.20.150.133

Default option would be Mk IV

September 21 2011, 4:20 PM 

As Roy said, the Mk III is actually very rare so unless you are building a specific vehicle, then a Mk IV is always the better choice for a generic version.

Regards,
John

 
 Respond to this message   
John Eckhardt
(Login jhe56)
Missing-Lynx members
128.183.195.99

What's needed to convert the AFV Club MK III to a MK IV?

September 21 2011, 4:27 PM 

I'm not a Churchill guy so need some advice. If I wanted to convert my AFV club Mk III AVRE to a Mk IV, what do I need? Is the LionMark MK IV turret all I need, or are there other details?


    
This message has been edited by jhe56 from IP address 128.183.195.99 on Sep 21, 2011 4:27 PM


 
 Respond to this message   
Chris Meddings
(Login ChrisDM)
Missing-Lynx members
62.30.225.82

A few Options

September 21 2011, 5:40 PM 

AVREs used a variety of turrets, including the three basic types of MkIV turret and the MkV turret (MkV turrets were apparently overproduced so some AVREs were built using them)

You can use the MkIV AFV Club kit and swap the turrets (although you would probably) need an early MkIII 6pdr barrel) to get a MkIII Gun Tank and a MkIV AVRE. You would need to be careful on some of the details though top avoid getting a MkIII turret on a late IV hull (periscopes and boxes on the rear mainly)

Or you could get a Lionmarc MkIV early or late turret

Or you could get one of the Inside the Armour turrets: Mid production MkIV or the MkV Turret

I must declare an interest. ITA is my company, but in my defence, I hear the Lionmarc turret is very good too wink.gif


Chris


 
 Respond to this message   
John Tapsell
(Login John_Tapsell)
Missing-Lynx members
86.20.150.133

Turret

September 21 2011, 5:43 PM 

John,

Yes - fundamentally it's the turret that is the difference.

79th Armd Div workshops converted about 180(?) prior to D-Day using a standard kit of parts. They used mostly Mk IVs, with a few Mk IIIs thrown in to make up numbers.

Other AVREs were factory-converted at MG Cars and these were all (I believe) based on Mk IVs.

The real problem is that many Mk I and Mk II Churchills had been 'reworked' by MG into IIIs and IVs and then later converted into AVREs so odd little features got carried across.

Bottom line is that the turret was the significant difference. Photos do exist of Mk IIIs in Normandy so if you wanted to go with a Mk III and weren't bothered about modelling an exact vehicle, it would be historically viable.

Regards,
John

 
 Respond to this message   
mp robinson
(Login m1e2r3l4i5n6)
Missing-Lynx members
67.71.120.42

MkV turrets and special build AVREs

September 21 2011, 6:26 PM 

Hi Chris, I had never heard of specially built Churchill AVREs, I thought they were all conversions of existing gun tanks, from the first prototype to the postwar MkVII based AVRE. I hope the following does not pirate the thread...

I have seen some late MkIV gun tanks (6 pdr armed) with MkV type turrets (ie square mantlet hole, central ventilator on the roof, and thickened turret ring protection)and I believe most MkVI new builds had this late turret too.

I have followed your Churchill stuff these past few years and must commend you on the many excellent builds, I am a bit of a Churchill junkie myself (I have converted the old Tamiya beast to MkIV NA 75, early MkIV and uparmoured and upgunned MkIV 75mm so far with the IMA 3 in gun carrier and MkI to go in the near future before I start the good few AFV Club Churchills I have to build in my stash). I wish ITA every success and keep up the good work.

I will take the chance to ask your opinion on the following:
Since we have seen 6 pdr MkV armed late MkIV gun tanks fitted with MkV type turrets, MkVIs fitted with MkV type turrets armed with 75mm guns and of course MkV Churchills armed with the 95mm howitzer, was it the universal turret by the end of A22 production (ie the original type of tanks with square hull doors and visors, bolted construction etc, ie before the MkVII replaced it in production in 1943/44)? Or was it actually overproduced as you stated? From what I have seen either way, lots if not all of the late production cast turreted Churchills (pre MkVII) had this MkV type of turret.

regards

merlin

 
 Respond to this message   
Chris Meddings
(Login ChrisDM)
Missing-Lynx members
62.30.225.82

Re: MkV turrets and special build AVREs

September 21 2011, 7:20 PM 

Sorry Merlin, when I said 'built' I didn't mean built from the wheels up I meant built into (a better word would have been converted obviously) AVREs from existing stocks of gun tanks or gun tank components

Just purely looking at AVREs I have personally looked it, it seems they used whatever was suitable judging by the variety of turret styles etc

The MkV turret is subtly different from the MkVI. I have always assumed (and assuming is far from acceptable I know) that the changes made from the MkIV to the MkV to accomodate that sighting, improve ventilation, allow for sighting at increased elevation etc were found to be useful enough to become a standard.

If there was an over production of MkV turrets, it would make sense to use them on MkIVs too, especially with the strengthened turret ring etc. But I lack the research on it to speak with any great authority

The way to tell for sure would be to get on the roof and look at the wireless mounts. I understand teh MkVI had an axtra WS38 fitted to talk to the infantry (as did the MkVII) Which means the turret has two conical mounts and a mast, as opposed to the one conical and one mast mount. Unfortunately this area is not often visible in photos.

When making the kits I strive to be as accurate as possible, but I would not call myself an expert by any means at all, just a big enthusiast!


ALWAYS looking to learn on Churchills and what you say makes sense, so I'm off to do some more digging :D

 
 Respond to this message   
ossie Orsbourn
(Login ossie)
Missing-Lynx members
82.20.63.151

Churchill AVRE Mk4

September 22 2011, 2:58 PM 

Hi Patrick

i would use the AFV Club Mk4 kit it was the predominately AVRE mark on the First wave of D Day . like the one which we dug up on juno beach in 1978 belonging to 26 Assault Squadron

this is the AFV cLUB mK4 KIT i have some minor details it is based on a actual vehicle that landed on D Day and was back loaded to UK in 1947 then scrapped in 1953 in UK. the picture of it being loaded to go on its final trip was given to me by the driver.

Hope you like it Ossie
[IMG][linked image][/IMG]

 
 Respond to this message   
Michel Sabarly
(Login Michel_Sabarly)
Missing-Lynx members
82.235.104.86

Re: Churchill AVRE Mk4

September 23 2011, 3:06 AM 

That is one beautiful AVRE Ossie!

You mention it's based on an actual vehicle that landed on D-Day. From the name 'BANDIT' I assume it belonged to 77 Aslt Sqn RE on D-Day, unless the name was added later on?

Do you have any additional info as regards its role (Bobbin, Bridge or else), its Troop, crew, callsign, LCT etc. on D-Day?

Congratulations on an outstanding rendition. Could you grace us with more pictures of it?

Michel


remove "truck" from email address

 
 Respond to this message   
ossie Orsbourn
(Login ossie)
Missing-Lynx members
82.20.63.151

AVRE

September 23 2011, 6:52 AM 

hi Michel

thank you for your kind comment .
what you must remember that all three regiments of tanks were still in germany and actually a lot stayed there till the 60s when they were scrapped.
[IMG][linked image][/IMG]
this is a mk4
[IMG][linked image][/IMG]
Mk3 with steel fascine cradle
pictures is 1947 loading tank back to squadron
from what i understand from the owner of the picture this is what happened.
he landed with 557 sqn in late 1944 went to 26 assault squadron when his callsign was 3f .
after this he drove a AVRE which had 200 ft wire rope wrapped around the turret and was used to pull things out of the rivers as a tug.
then he went on his last exercise in germany before demob . his last task was to drive the AVRE on the victory parade in UK.
[IMG][linked image][/IMG]
this is the tank he says he drove and i must take his word. since found out that he would have drawn a AVRE from a Park Squadron for the exercise which might explains markings. so as you see nothing is simple , and at the end of the war untill they moved in 1949 to UK they were still a mixed regiment of engineers and tankie's (my farther being one until 1953 when he transferred to the engineers)
[IMG][linked image][/IMG]
.
at the time i built the model i did not have a complete set of early track so i used late track.
a lot of the D Day funnies stuff survived right up till the 60s and served along side late versions not just AVREs.ARKs.Bridgelayers


hope this helps Osssie


    
This message has been edited by ossie from IP address 82.20.63.151 on Sep 23, 2011 6:57 AM


 
 Respond to this message   
Michel Sabarly
(Login Michel_Sabarly)
Missing-Lynx members
82.235.104.86

Re: AVRE

September 23 2011, 4:06 PM 

Thanks for these fine pictures and your explanations. It looks like it will difficult to track this particular 'BANDIT' to its D-Day unit, if any, but then nothing forbids us to assume it was indeed 77 ASRE?

The long carreer of the Churchill AVsRE that you describe is testimony to their clever design as Engineer tanks, especially when more modern chassis like the Centurion's were available (and also used as Engineer tanks).

Michel


remove "truck" from email address

 
 Respond to this message   
mp robinson
(Login m1e2r3l4i5n6)
Missing-Lynx members
67.71.120.42

a good resource...

September 24 2011, 10:28 AM 

Since there is little of recent vintage written on The Funnies, a good resource with some useful info on the D-Day AVREs is the recent title from Stackpole:

Anderson, Richard C. Jr. Cracking Hitlers Atlantic Wall: The 1st Assault Brigade Royal Engineers on D-Day. Stackpole Books, Mechanicsburg PA, USA 2010.

I could not put this one down and it deserves more than one read.
Anderson's book is well written and deals almost exclusively with The Funnies on D-Day (and most of that is the AVREs and Crabs after all). The reader will profit from the author's solid research as well as his analytical approach to how the Funnies fared on D-Day. For teh record he also explains how it was that the US never got any AVREs or Crabs in time for D-Day and evaluates how the terrain on the US Beaches might have impacted their use had they been available.Ossie I can see your mark on this book and have heard you have long had a book in the works about AVREs, I hope one day that a publisher sees the quality of your own research and puts it into print. Anyhow, that would be the most recent title on the subject that I am aware of and it would be well worth picking up.

Merlin


 
 Respond to this message   
 
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  


Terms and Conditions of Use
Report abuse