Home > Discussion Groups > Figures

Google search

Message posting guidelines:
1.	Full real names must be used at all times.
2.	A valid e-mail address must be provided. (This is not optional)
3.	Images must be posted at low resolution (72 dpi) and no larger than 760 pixels wide, and copyright/trade mark owners must be credited whenever reasonably possible.
4.	From 20 April, registration is compulsory if you wish to post messages on the Discussion Groups. For further information, please see the following message: http://www.network54.com/Forum/message?forumid=47212&messageid=1113823220
Please read our Community guidelines before posting.
By contributing to this discussion group, you indicate your agreement to the Terms and Conditions of Use.
Posts that violate the guidelines or Terms and conditions of Use of the Missing-lynx.com discussion groups will be erased, and repeated violation of this policy may result in termination of the violator's account.

Return to Index

Indeed, the G41 (Mauser) (Image)

July 5 2009 at 2:23 AM

(Login MikeRoof)
Missing-Lynx members
from IP address 62.215.222.99

Response to G41(M)

Oh ye of little faith... (myself included)... Mr. Volstad is correct as usual, and the mold cutters at DML were, well..., almost correct.

The rifles are indeed the Mauser versions of the rare as unicorns G41. Below is a pic comparing the two variants (Mauser on top and Walther below) clearly showing the differences in the bolt handles (both shape and placement). (Photo credit should go to diggerhistory.com)

One might quibble and note that the boxtop illustration correctly shows the bolt handle at the rear of the receiver and that the photo of the assembled figgies shows that DML cut the handles forward of the trigger guard. However, what is clear that the rifles are G41(M)'s.

Mr. Volstad and DML have both lived up to their reputations.

Mike

[linked image]