Started tonight. McDavid had 2 for the Marlies. Kid is going to be a star

Vaughan and Mississauga got wins as well

I wonder if it will be another all GTHL final 4

96s are a weak group.

The GTHL has some very good players, and London is very strong, other than that the talent pool is very weak.

It should be 3 GTHL teams and London as final 4.

GTHL braggards again. Happens every year. BTW 2 goals in a game does not make you a star. Other players on other teams OUTSIDE the GTHL are doing well too.

you're right, 2 goals in a game doesnt make you a star

However, dominating every team you play as a kid that is a year younger does. Dont hate on the kid. He's legit

The kids playing on the GTHL teams are the top players - they may not all be from the GTA - one scout told me that outside of the GTA there are no standouts except London.

Unlike other years where there were top kids from Ottawa, or Sudbury, or Niagara / Welland, this years top talent plays for GTA based teams.

McD is not from GTA

who gives **** it'll all be over in a couple of years. Teach them a lesson and keep them in school

Abou Assaly from Ottawa has 11 points in his first 2 games. One scout told me his stock has been rising since the Peterborough tourny when he was by far the best player on the ice.

OHL Cup observations so far;

JUSTIFIED RATINGS
McDavid ( needs to amass size quickly though)
Fabri ( Plays above his size )
DalColle
McKeown

RISING STOCK
Abou Assaly ( next Monahan perhaps ? )

FALLING
Ho Sang ( Oh Boy! )
Middleton
Herbst

General concensus around the Hershey this week is that teams will be going after forwards heavily in the early rounds. AFter McKeown the drop off in D is dramatic this year. Look for London to possibly pull the trigger on the first Goalie pick.
As was the case with last years 95's this year the GTHL is again showing that it has a far superior 96' league. I would say that the Ottawa league has now taken over "next best" from the OMHA.

Does anyone know the order of draft picks, order of which team picks?

Ho-Sang a major for slashing?! That kid has some serious issues!!

Amazing what happens when Abou Assaly plays against a decent team, not exceptional, but decent team and NO goals! Kid is still a strong player though and the Ottawa team is playing well so look for them and the other Ottawa teams to show very well in this draft.

Abou Assaly set up the OT winner vs. the Nats in a low scoring game. You cant expect him to get 5+ points per game. Give him some credit

well said.

You missed the point daddy. When playing weaker teams the scores almost invariably run up high and points are had galore. Conversely, when you play stronger teams them scores don't get run up high but that's where you ARE expected to step up and score your goals and help your team. If the previous 2 teams were stronger then no one would be talking about Abou-Assaly right now since the points would be around 3 or 4. Is he still a good player, yes, I personally thinks so. Is he a McDavid or a DalColle, no.

12:56, no one missed any point. in your conclusion you agree he's still a very good player.

your explanation applies to number of controversial "star" players. it describes Ryan Murphy to a T. against crappier teams with Kitchener running the board he gets a bushel of points. against tougher teams sometimes he's invisible, hence part of the reason why he didn't make the U-18 IH tourney or this past year's U-20 WJC. however the bottom line is he's still a very good player; AA too.

Rebels up 2-0 in the 3rd vs. the Jr 67's.

Marlies vs. OV Titans in the other semi

So a Rebels-Marlies final then. Should be a good one. Herbst has been unreal in the OHL Cup so far I guess. Might be the difference if he can keep it up

96 very weak group,some 95s should be getting drafted.

Outside of the Marlies and Rebels, it is a very weak age group. London has a couple of good kids, Ottawa has a couple, but depth overall is very very weak.

Rebels just won 2-1 in OT

OHL Cup MVP was the 97 kid McDavid! LAMB ain't gonna be happy!

1. Top kid in the GTHL was the underager
2. OHL Cup MVP was the underager
3. #1 Draft pick next year is the underager
4. 96's NO GOLD this year

REALIZATION that LAMB is going apeshit right about now...LOL!!

L O S E R ! ! ! !

Funny that it seems just because there is an underage that is phenominal,that the rest of the draft sucks. Not sure if you were actually at the OHL but there are some great 15 year olds----remember they are 15. Have to admit that I was very surprised that the two Ottawa teams made the semis,pretty impressive for club teams.

OHL Cup MVP was the 96 kid last year! 95 LIDS ain't gonna be happy!

1. Top kid in the GTHL was the underager
2. OHL Cup MVP was the underager
3. #1 Draft pick in the 95 draft was a 96 lol
4. 95's NO GOLD this year AGAIN, 2 embarassing bronze medals back to back years, no other team or year has ever played these tournaments this poorly

REALIZATION that LIDS is going apeshit right about now...LOL!!

L O S E R ! ! ! !

LAMB, can you get ANY facts straight?!!!

OHL Cup LAST year was a 95 !!!

This YEAR WAS THE UNDERAGER STUPID!!!

Why would LAMB think the OHL Cup MVP winner last year was a 96 cause that would've only meant Ekblad and I doubt he was even close to contending for it. McDavid's winning of the OHL Cup MVP was an easy decision despite the points he put up. He could've been tied or a few points below and he still would've won it if only because he dominated so much. Wherever he lands, good luck to him.

Ekblad didn't even play in last year's OHL Cup.

This is getting really boring. Say something good about a kid for a change....so much BS on this site.

LIDS is absolutley losing it, not happy that the 95 draft was weakest in 10 years, 96 went 1st in the 95 draft, best rookie this year in the O was a 96...lol

He is chewing his fingers!

that's not true - Max Domi was the stand-out player and he's a 95.

Every year has stand-out and wash-outs, that's sports.

It's a ridiculous debate since ONLY time will tell who's any good or not.

LAMB brings up the fact that a 96 went first overall in last years draft...HEY STUPID! SAME THING IS HAPPENING THIS YEAR WITH A 97 GOING FIRST OVERALL!

- Also, the 97 was the OHL Cup MVP this year and last year the 96 WASN'T!
- The 97 was the TOP scorer in the regular season beating out all other 96's including stealing the crown from #66

Need I go on...like 96's not winning GOLD! DUH!

OH yes, please look up and see how insecure the 95 lids poppa is, copies and paste all other posts...jealous and insecure and he is a waste, his kid is small and is not playing in the O next year, and whines at anybody and everybody lol

LOL, this Village Idiot, the 95 Lil Insecure DADDY, is one messed up POPPA LMAO.........

95s win the OHL Cup in the 95 year? OMG LMAO who won the OHL Cup in the 96 year this year?? YOU ARE ONE WACK JOB VILLAGE IDIOT 95 LIDS! LMFAOAROTF lol

BAAAAAAHHHHHHHHH! BAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHH!

CAN'T HANDLE MORE TRUTH CAN YOU LAMB??

HEY, REMEMBER THE RECORD # OF 94'S THAT YOU PREDICTED???! STILL WAITING!! LOL!!

Okay we need to stop this again. Last time everyone ignored LAMB in the other threads he went away so lets stop this now before he ruins this forum already. These 4 threads need to be ignored.

To complain go to: http://www.network54.com/Forum/475431/


<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >> Return to Forum

EAST 95AA Teams for 2011/2012 Season-new thread
May 23 2011 at 10:58 AM
No score for this post Anonymous Coward (no login)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


here it is not as long ...BASH AWAY


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Author Reply
Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: EAST 95AA Teams for 2011/2012 Season-new thread
No score for this post May 23 2011, 6:13 PM



Sounds like your upset?? Where is your son playing, Leaside, NT, GPR or may even be with the Canadiens. If so than be happy and get on with your fantastic world!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message
Anonymous Coward
(no login)
Re: NT 95
No score for this post May 20 2011, 1:54 PM

Who did the Canadiens lose?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message
Anonymous Coward
(no login)
Re: NT 95
No score for this post May 21 2011, 9:40 PM

McClyment, Durous, Piorkowski and Clarke all went to Goulding.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message
Anonymous Coward
(no login)
Re: NT 95
No score for this post May 22 2011, 12:00 AM

There's only two returning players on Hillcrest. They've gone all over. Some to A some to AAA


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message
Anonymous Coward
(no login)
Re: NT 95
No score for this post May 22 2011, 8:12 PM


Sounds like your upset?? Where is your son playing, Leaside, NT, GPR or may even be with the Canadiens. If so than be happy and get on with your fantastic world!

the stats dont lie


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message
Anonymous Coward
(no login)
Re: NT 95
No score for this post May 23 2011, 2:20 PM

Past performance may not be indicative of future returns.




Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Predictions
No score for this post August 11 2011, 12:15 PM


Ok, let's hear the scoop on each team and where will everyone finish?
My prediction is ; LF - NT - GPR - MI - WBH - TA - HC



Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post August 12 2011, 2:20 PM


NT
LF
Goulding
WBH
MI
hillcrest




Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post August 12 2011, 2:21 PM


and TA sligley ahead of Hillcrest


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post August 13 2011, 8:53 AM


12:15 must be a Flames parent, how pathetic!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post August 14 2011, 12:26 PM


arent the east teams mixing in with the west this year though?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post August 18 2011, 12:19 PM


Yes, it is an interlock year but the better teams will still prevail.
GPR is rated too high , probably 4th is more realistic. Too many retreads on this team. LF still the team to beat.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post August 18 2011, 1:08 PM


Who did NT get that warrant them being rated so high?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post August 21 2011, 7:05 PM


retreads? are thy tired


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post August 22 2011, 12:23 AM


GPR will flop this year. Too many of there best players left. Coach can't do tricks with this group.
Team will not do well and will get run over against west teams.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post August 22 2011, 8:59 AM


whats with the Aces. Only have 11 players and don't post in the players wanted?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post August 22 2011, 7:30 PM


again hoping to pick up others garbage


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post August 24 2011, 11:37 PM


The almighty AAA cuts, sure thing


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post August 25 2011, 9:02 AM


Which do we choose?

East plays 6 teams 6 times=36 games
East plays 6 teams 4 times and 11 west teams once=35 games
east and west play each team twice 17 teams times 2 =34 games


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post August 25 2011, 7:02 PM


That's for A.

In AA there are 7 East and 11 West teams. Regardless how they structure it, you'll play 36 games. But some teams you may play more times than others.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post August 25 2011, 7:23 PM


As long as they play 36 and with some semblence of balance it will work out. West is still the better division though.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post August 30 2011, 8:39 AM


12 WEST TEAMS IF YOU LOOK AND COUNT AND 7 IN EAST
19 IN TOTAL
PLAY EACH TEAM TWICE AND YOU GET 36 GAMES
HOW COULD IT BE MORE FAIR?




Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post August 30 2011, 8:48 AM


Agree completely but is this what is going to be done? Does anyone know?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 1 2011, 9:59 AM


i heard you play 12 games interlock


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 2 2011, 8:10 AM


12 games in other division, 24 games in your own. Sounds reasonable.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 5 2011, 11:25 AM


any early bird tournaments started yet? who is looking good?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 12 2011, 8:02 PM


WBH and GPR lookied brutal in the vaughan early bird!!
They are no match for any of the west teams.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 13 2011, 12:19 PM


I saw them both play and WBH looked really bad but, GPR looked not as bad but very weak.
Could be a long season.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 13 2011, 12:22 PM


goulding beat the braves 4-1 thought braves were a respectable team


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 13 2011, 2:09 PM


I think you are confusing the Vaughan Rangers with Goulding, the Vaughan team got beat 3-0 against a team that was half trying


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 15 2011, 7:01 PM


95 GPR slapped badly by VR in Miss Early Bird.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 16 2011, 12:23 AM


GPR played ok but mental lapses and goaltending cost them the game. Getting mercied is embarassing. Don't think they can compete against west teams.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 16 2011, 12:31 AM


Goulding looked pretty average at MEB. They got spanked byVR pretty badly. Stay in the east where the teams are easy.
West is still best. HH will spank Goulding on saturday too. By by Coach. You cant teach anybody anything, loser!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 16 2011, 8:33 AM


Goulding missing four players and having to use call-ups. Spanked Terriers pretty good last night but will be in tough against the Huskies. Jets not looking so hot. And Sharks have yet to score a goal. Looks like some teams have some work to do.

Stars & Tigers advance to semi's. Vaughan will likely advance. It will be a battle for the last spot.




Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 16 2011, 11:28 AM


Goulding will do fine, they're very inconsistant due to goaltending but as the season goes on they will compete with the best in the west.

ST will dominate this year, a lot of talent and the capability to work together effectively. Size, speed, scoring.

HH will be top 3 for sure, but has a history of choking in the big games.

VR very different team this year, very small, quick and skilled with great goaltending. They will destroy slow teams but will be in tough with those that can skate.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 16 2011, 11:38 AM


sorry worst teams are in the west. who is worse than the ice dogs... nobody
Royals vey weak, Panthers,


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 17 2011, 5:06 AM


GP will never be the same without their goalie that saved their as$ every game.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 18 2011, 11:40 AM


VR and VP will chase ST this season. Should be a great season in the west!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 18 2011, 8:23 PM


GPR will be very average this season. They cannot compete with the top teams and don't have enough skill.
Coaching is not very good either. A wasted season for sure.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 19 2011, 9:31 AM


After watching some games in the Earlybirds, looks like this for the East standings,

NT
WBH
HC
MI
GPR
LF
TA


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 19 2011, 10:32 AM


I agree with above poster except, I think MI will finish ahead of WBH. GPR looked awful in the earlybirds and could be in for a bad season. Coaching not up to par with this team. Coaches from last year were the real reason behind past success of team. All best players left too.
Itll be a long disappointing season for GPR.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 19 2011, 12:29 PM


I agree. The best players and coaches left team and this year, coaches and players below avg. Poor goalies on this squad too. Saw a few of games and too many goals against. Not enough scoring on this squad too. Looks like bad season ahead. NT team to beat.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 19 2011, 1:08 PM


In regards to GPR, you don't mean those players high on drugs, because we will be better off without them, and good luck to teams that incorporated them


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 19 2011, 2:09 PM


What early bird tournament did NT and MI play in that shows them to be so outstanding?

WBH had a 0% GF% in the Vaughan Rangers Early bird. Not one goal for and 16 goals against in three games. Not exactly a powerhouse performance. Granted they won the Hillcrest EB but it was against weaker competitors. Still they showed some good signs.

LF and HC have to be the surprises from the HC tournament. LF should have been able to take this tournament if they are a close resemblance to the team last year. HC did better than I would have expected. Good for them.

Islanders and GPR both played against them in the MEB and came out with 1-2 records. Though GPR's GF avg of .48% was better than MI's .35%.

Regardless, ST, VR, HH, NS are going to be a challenge for the east teams.

Injuries, missing players, and teams still coming together play a big part in the early results. I think it is a bit premature to be crowning anyone division leaders. Or to be writing anyone off either. Remember the Penguins last season.... started weak and ended strong.




Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 19 2011, 6:41 PM


Flames only beat the Duffield Devils single A team 2-1. Hillcrest lost to the Devils 2-1. What happened???

Why did Teerney(SYB Goalie) go play for the Icedogs?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 20 2011, 12:37 AM


NT team to beat in the east. HC and MI to follow. WBH then LF . GPR 6th place with the last playoff spot.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 20 2011, 12:46 AM


Thats stupid, gpr will be top 3 for sure. Theyve played the top 3 teams in the west 4 times and did alright, goaltending will let them down but they will compete. Everyone else has played only east teams so dont go ripping on gpr because of there record.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

New guy
(Login bardownking) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 21 2011, 4:37 PM


Okay !! How do you know who is going to be in what place already, when the season is just starting??
The WBH have already won a tournament !


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 20 2011, 11:40 AM


wrong Hillcrest lost 1-0


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 22 2011, 11:20 AM


GPR lost there first game and there will be many more to come!
Careful, last 2 spots in the division are up for grabs. Let's see how many goals NT beats then by this weekend!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 22 2011, 11:25 AM


GPR team is full of retreads as best players left. Coaches can't do magic with this bunch. Will have to settle for mediocrity!
Better luck next year.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 22 2011, 12:08 PM


Please stop with the GPR bashing! This team will be fine and improve as the season goes on. They will be challenging for the top spot in the division.
Warch and see!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 22 2011, 12:24 PM


GPR looked good against VR, VR one of the top teams in west after wining MEB


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 22 2011, 12:32 PM


NT is the best team in the East and will have no problem with any team from West. City Champs here we come.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 22 2011, 1:40 PM


Who got 9 games for fighting and racial slur's on GPR?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 22 2011, 1:55 PM


VR Player got suspension, and deservedly so, there is no place for racial slurs, of anykind in todays society


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 22 2011, 2:10 PM


lighten up susy and go back to your tennis club


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 22 2011, 7:31 PM


NT is the best team in the East and will have no problem with any team from West. City Champs here we come.

nt, no talent?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 22 2011, 8:44 PM


Haha what are you a flamers parent? Just watch NT, they're going to make you look like a complete idiot for saying that


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 23 2011, 11:38 AM


WBH the best team in east. Got rid of problems and will win east!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 23 2011, 12:18 PM


I agree! WBH won the preseason tournament and are ready to roll......over their opponents.
NT has no chance against this team.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 23 2011, 1:04 PM


WBH favoured this year, not to concerned about team like NT


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 23 2011, 1:25 PM


Hawks look good, well see if they can continue that throughout the season. past experience suugests they start strong and then falter


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 23 2011, 2:17 PM


some parent on another team trying to stir the pot again. Give it a rest already. Looks like NT will be the team to beat with Hawks,Rangers and Canadiens battling for 2nd. Flames 5th,Islanders 6th and Aces 7th.



Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 23 2011, 3:54 PM


Dear NT parent: How can you make any kind of reasonable assessment about NT's chances when they have yet to play a game? Try going up against Streetsville, Vaughan Rangers or the Huskies. Then you'll have a better idea of how good (or not) your team is.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 23 2011, 5:18 PM


WHy do you think the Canadiens will be strong ? too earl;y to make predictions. Hawks look good, Ilanders have some potential


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 24 2011, 10:14 AM


Why do you think NT will be strong. They tied Hillcrest. LOL


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 24 2011, 10:16 AM


I think it will be more like this,
WBH and GPR fighting for 1st
Canadians 3rd
Nt 4th
MI 5th
Flames 6th
Aces 7th.



Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 24 2011, 10:16 AM


Something tells me NT is going to a be a team everyone loves to hate because they are so high on themselves.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 25 2011, 6:02 AM


Markham bombs the Aces 5-0. Looks like a long season for the aces who struggled with a very short bench.

Leaside coughs up a 2-0 lead and loses to Hillcrest 3-2.

The game to watch today will be GPR vs North Toronto. The soothsayers who post on this site are suggesting that these two teams should be fighting for first.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 25 2011, 8:33 AM


So far, can only see NT as winning division, other teams have all shown major flaws, tonight will be the start to a great season


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 25 2011, 9:36 AM


NT couldn't beat HC.They will finish 4th.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 25 2011, 10:10 PM


I think it will end up like this

GPR
WBH
MI
HC
NT
LF
TA


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 26 2011, 6:40 PM


Who do u think are the best players in then east division?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 26 2011, 6:45 PM


they are all playing midget AA Sr


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 26 2011, 7:06 PM


and North Toronto


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 26 2011, 7:34 PM


and aces


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 28 2011, 12:44 PM


I think it will end up like this

GPR
WBH
MI
HC
NT
LF
TA

If WBH end up in second then they need to play better than they did last night!



Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 28 2011, 1:35 PM


Everyone from the goalie out had a bad game for WBH


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 28 2011, 3:27 PM


Interesting result, but I think it might just be the way it is for the East loop this season. So far when you look at how each of the teams has fared in pre-season and early season play, there doesn't seem to be any run-away favourite.

Despite all the posters who seem ready to award to crown to this team or that, it seems that no one can take anyone else for granted, and that makes for better hockey.

Enjoy the season and good luck to all the kids.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 28 2011, 3:37 PM


Good post.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 28 2011, 4:48 PM


Anyone who has watched any games this year has seen some very good hockey. If kids can get used to tighter rules on head shots and stay out of box it will be a good year of hockey!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 28 2011, 10:19 PM


Everyone slotted the flames in first in august, now 6th? lol what happened? did all the new wbh players just find out about this forum?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 29 2011, 8:35 AM


i can tell you one thing that's happened; They've only played two games and have 34 more to go. Why don't we wait a couple of months to see how things shape up before trying to judge an entire season on one week.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 29 2011, 9:53 AM


NT much better than the Flames. Why all the hype. They couldn't beat HC.this year. I agree, 34 more games to go. Lets wait till the end of November first, than we should know by then.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post September 29 2011, 9:57 AM


If you look at the results of their head-to-head game, North Toronto couldn't beat Hillcrest either. Like the last two posters said, lets wait until we're 10 to 12 games in. Then we'll we might have some idea who's for real and who isn't.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post October 1 2011, 11:24 PM


Is that a correct score? 0 - 0 Hillcrest game?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post October 2 2011, 12:03 AM


yep.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post October 2 2011, 12:19 AM


I heard nobody showed up to play. They were there, but nobody played.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post October 2 2011, 8:20 PM


MI the dark horse this year. Solid goaltending will carry a long way.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Predictions
No score for this post October 3 2011, 6:52 PM


MI tending subpar at best, nice try though dad


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) GPR losers
No score for this post October 3 2011, 7:21 PM


GPR is 0-3 to start the season! Looks like a long season with that first win not in sight. No playlets for you!
Best players left this team, going nowhere fast! Any more magic tricks Coach?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: GPR losers
No score for this post October 3 2011, 10:40 PM


why slam the coach?
bone to pick?
anyone who knows him LOVES the guy...you're a bird on a wire, grumpy - move along!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: GPR losers
No score for this post October 4 2011, 8:37 AM


MI may be dark hore but 14th thru 17th players maybe better suited for "A"


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: GPR losers
No score for this post October 4 2011, 9:21 AM


please let everybody know if a east team ever beats a west team

i've been trying to follow schedule but so many games but few between east/west

so far only been a couple and west won them all?



Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: GPR losers
No score for this post October 4 2011, 9:28 AM


WBH beat the panthers in the HC early bird, 2-1.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: GPR losers
No score for this post October 4 2011, 9:38 AM


Hillcrest beat the Panthers, the Ice Dogs and the Royals in the same tournament.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: GPR losers
No score for this post October 4 2011, 12:02 PM


Hah, well so did willowdale, but those teams aren't exactly powerhouses


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: GPR losers
No score for this post October 4 2011, 1:48 PM


REGULAR SEASON




Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: GPR losers
No score for this post October 4 2011, 1:56 PM


Panthers are not a powerhouse??? They tied the mighty Vaughan Rangers in the regular season.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: GPR losers
No score for this post October 7 2011, 9:34 AM


GPR is 0-3 to start the season! Looks like a long season with that first win not in sight. No playlets for you!
Best players left this team, going nowhere fast! Any more magic tricks Coach?

Looks like lots of magic tricks for GPR! Good win boys!!!!!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: GPR losers
No score for this post October 7 2011, 9:46 AM


What happen to GPR staring goalie from last year?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: GPR losers
No score for this post October 7 2011, 11:07 AM


Playing with Eagles Midget Sr.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: GPR losers
No score for this post October 7 2011, 11:47 AM


GPR beat Islanders 7-0 last night - doesnt look like goaltending was an issue!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: GPR losers
No score for this post October 7 2011, 12:22 PM


Islanders mailed it in - lack passion


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: GPR losers
No score for this post October 7 2011, 4:08 PM


Lets see how GPR do in next weeks
Huskies tournament where they
will play with some big boys.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: GPR losers
No score for this post October 7 2011, 8:10 PM


GPR's top two forwards haven't played in a regular season game... makes a huge difference


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Shake-out
No score for this post October 8 2011, 8:54 AM


Leaside vs NT tomorrow. Predictions?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post October 8 2011, 9:23 AM


no predictions.



Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post October 8 2011, 12:40 PM


Leaside will probably come out on top of this one.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post October 8 2011, 3:18 PM


Who are the GPR players missing? How long will they be out?

I say leaside wins against NT


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post October 8 2011, 6:19 PM


27 suspended for fighting
91 out with concussion.




Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post October 10 2011, 8:28 AM


No one in east will touch top 4 in west. Even panthers better than all east teams.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post October 10 2011, 11:54 PM


the panthers suck!!!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post October 11 2011, 8:07 AM


Of course. The POWERHOUSE PANTHERS. Them with only 3 wins in seven games and all three came against the three weakest teams in the loop. Their record against East competition was in the earlybird where they went a sizzling 2 wins and 2 losses against Eastern opponents. They should wait until the do something before they come on here and blather.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post October 11 2011, 8:43 AM


I doubt it was the Panthers making those comments. Just some Westie trying to get under the skin of the Easties. Looks like it worked.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post October 11 2011, 9:29 AM


You know what's really good for chirping the east or west?




If you lick my bumhole.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post October 12 2011, 11:41 AM


We beat NT and Hawks bad. No one can touch us now in the East! We will be ready for the West teams and compete with them.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post October 12 2011, 1:17 PM


LF are the best of the East division and will be fine against the west teams. Don't count your chickens.......


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post October 12 2011, 1:19 PM


GPR sucks and will be in 2nd last place ahead of Aces.
Coach sucks and the team will reflect him.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post October 12 2011, 1:23 PM


GPR is a joke! Team is weak in all areas and will have terrible season. Move to A Coach, where you belong.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post October 12 2011, 4:12 PM


GPR sre a non factor, why spend so much time talking
about them.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post October 12 2011, 5:29 PM


you must be kidding LF could not beat the Jets in the West, would definitely be a non playoff team, if so great why not play in Huskies tourney and show your stuff loser


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post October 12 2011, 5:59 PM


^what


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post October 13 2011, 5:50 PM


Leaside and GPR are a joke. Both teams are going nowhere fast!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post October 13 2011, 7:29 PM


Leaside is fast.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post October 13 2011, 8:15 PM


Leaside is fast. Against teams from east. Lets see how they do against teams from west


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post October 13 2011, 11:52 PM


They may be fast but very small and soft and the the first team that actually throws a hit against them will smoke 'em!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post October 13 2011, 11:58 PM


You can't catch them!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post October 14 2011, 12:01 AM


Too bad for Aces and Islanders. 2 more days left for final roster. Must have 15 players or they will lose any game played along with a $100 fine for each game. Maybe they should join forces and fold 1 team.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post October 14 2011, 9:23 AM


I am confused with anyone saying LF has speed, we played agaist them don't see it


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post October 14 2011, 10:08 AM


pretty sure both teams have full rosters?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post October 14 2011, 7:09 PM


Aces looking for players.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post October 16 2011, 10:12 AM


Nice to see WBH moving up. Good D and goalkeeping!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post October 16 2011, 11:36 AM


Also the Canadiens. Great goalkeeping and good D.
Flames have the best Forwards and GPR are there too.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post October 17 2011, 12:15 AM


GPR has a good team its only the beginning of the season yes there not that strong at times but when they come to play they play hard there 3 best players 91 95 89 yes 91 is out but 95 and 89 are fantastic players chu is a goon and iv heard story's about him smoking when he was on the lightning


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post October 17 2011, 1:27 AM


if smoking is the worst the kid is doing, he is a saint compared to some kids on other teams. last year n54 was full of stuff about drugs and pot. this year nothing. maybe they have all been reformed.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post October 17 2011, 4:03 PM


GPR D and G are weak. Middle of the pack team at best.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post October 17 2011, 4:17 PM


I agree with above post. GPR is nothing special and will struggle against good teams.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post October 17 2011, 4:28 PM


Saw GPR in Huskies tourny and team looked very sloppy. Power play non-existant. No break outs either, just chipping puck off the glass and out.
Lot of areas need work if willing to get back to division finals again. Not sure it can be done and yes Goalies are very weak.
LF are best of east.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post October 17 2011, 5:21 PM


GPR bench looked like they were short a lot of players. 2-1-1 isn't bad considering.




Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post October 19 2011, 9:15 AM


HC has beat everyone. Will be best in the east


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post October 19 2011, 10:15 AM


HCS has never beat WBH.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post October 19 2011, 11:50 AM


We beat the Flames!!!!!!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post October 19 2011, 12:45 PM


HC also lost to Duffield A, WBH, Goulding, and tied NT and Markham.

Not exactly a powerhouse of consistency at this point.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post October 19 2011, 2:27 PM


Goulding will be top in the east, along with LF and NT.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post October 19 2011, 2:39 PM


Any one of NT, WBH, LF, GP or HC could end up on top. Lots of hockey between now and the end of the season. A lot can change.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post October 22 2011, 1:10 PM


Aces 5 Leaside 1 ??? What happened? Is that a mistake ?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post October 22 2011, 6:07 PM


Nope. Aces/LF score is correct.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post October 22 2011, 11:14 PM


GPR 9-0 against Aces. Guess LF just had an awful game


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post October 23 2011, 10:37 PM


Yah, so did Aces yesterday. GPR not that good.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post October 23 2011, 10:38 PM


if you really knew chu, you'd know that he had a 40+ goal season last year with the lightning and a 60+ goal season two years ago with the lightning. you can't call the kid a goon because he plays a physical game


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post October 23 2011, 10:39 PM


Very true, he's an excellent kid and im proud to be friends with him


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post October 23 2011, 10:50 PM


Chi is a good player with aggressive tendencies. GPR will come together as a team and will surprise many." lots of good players on this team. Good season ahead!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) You were saying.....
No score for this post October 24 2011, 9:08 AM


Re: Shake-out October 12 2011, 1:19 PM

GPR sucks and will be in 2nd last place ahead of Aces.
Coach sucks and the team will reflect him.
______________________________________________________

Best GF% in the east, good performance at Huskies Tournament (2-1-1 record) and just beat Huskies who are top of the pack in the west.

Seems to me like the team is doing just fine.




Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post October 24 2011, 12:34 PM


as a spectator of the GPR(team who's going to "flop") vs. HH(top team in west), chu didn't look like a goon, scored two and assisted one in a 3-1 win, great game to watch, both teams showed up to play


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post October 24 2011, 2:50 PM


GPR full marks for their win last night. But
don't say both teams showed up to play.
GPR showed up, Huskies were awful and
suffered big let down after their win
over the Vaughan Rangers


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post October 26 2011, 10:07 AM


NT on a roll and will be best in east.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post October 26 2011, 10:56 AM


GPR is lucky and won 2 games by chance. Coach has nothin to do with team wins. He is and always was a bad coach, don't know the game at all and can't teach. Don't pimp him now. You'll see team will not do well.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post October 26 2011, 11:12 AM


Must be a getting close to a full moon cause the idiots are coming out. Hey 10:56, you must be getting excited about Halloween... your disguise as a knowledgeable hockey commentator is really scary.





Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post October 26 2011, 11:08 AM


NT will get crushed by GPR! They won't know what hit em. Game will be on sunday night! Read em and weep, Team green.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post October 26 2011, 2:28 PM


NT will roll over GPR. Too much speed and skill for such a badly coached team!!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post October 26 2011, 2:51 PM


Badly coached! You need to see your eye doctor and while your at it get your head exmined. GPR is a well coached team. You'll see who comes out of North Toronto arena with the W even with the refs heavily favouring the home team!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post October 26 2011, 6:11 PM


NT is the Vaughan Rangers of the East... Minus any form of skill, speed and stystems


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post October 26 2011, 7:27 PM


GPR works hard! Most nights, hard work will win.
Good win over HH, you deserved it.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post October 26 2011, 11:34 PM


gpr has best goalie in east, the key to winning it


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post October 27 2011, 12:49 AM


Gpr's goaltending is their weakest part of the team...


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post October 27 2011, 5:53 PM


oh



Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post October 28 2011, 4:55 PM


GPR is lucky because the refs give them favortism. Otherwise, they are avg everywhere. Especially the coach. He don't know......


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post October 28 2011, 5:14 PM


GPR in second place and will be in first soon. Luck has nothing to do with it!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post October 29 2011, 12:10 AM


Refs give favoritism, your a joke. Refs don't get anything out of that. This is not recess. Anything for an excuse, i guess you have to blame someone Grow up.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post October 29 2011, 11:28 AM


The refs hate GPR, not sure why but its true. Even at home


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post October 29 2011, 8:25 PM


everrybody hates GPR coach. Heès a goof. Doesn;t know the game at allù1


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post October 29 2011, 8:45 PM


Not everyone. Just you.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

a
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post October 29 2011, 9:25 PM


what



Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post October 30 2011, 6:39 AM


North Toronto top of the East. LMFAO Nice win Flames.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post October 30 2011, 9:47 AM


What happened to NT? Missing players again?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post October 30 2011, 6:34 PM


NT only have one win away from home. Maybe they can'
t win without the "Homer" Refs>


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post October 30 2011, 10:15 PM


Big game tonight with GPR. Score?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post October 30 2011, 11:48 PM


NT 4 - GPR 0


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post October 31 2011, 12:38 AM


GPR Coach lost control of his team, actually he never has control of his team. NT beat them badly and dominated!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post October 31 2011, 2:02 AM


Dont think GPR coach lost control of his players. only one player lost control and that player did it to himself he the one who lost control, the kid lost his mind.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post October 31 2011, 1:29 PM


First of all who posts at 2am???
GPR coach should step down he is not capable of coaching hockey. He cannot control or discipline any of his players. The club should fire him if they know what's best for the team.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post October 31 2011, 1:39 PM


Why do you care so much about the GPR coach?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post October 31 2011, 3:42 PM


Have watch the rangers, tigers, huskies and lightning
play. They all seem pretty equal. Only differnce is
Huskies seem to have stronger goaltending.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post October 31 2011, 5:23 PM


So much bad talk about GPR coach is stupid My son is currnetly playing for coach and org, and so far best he ha had in a while, obviously the individual bashing coach has no idea, and is a coward for post here instead of discussing issues with coach, obviously you are not on team and were one of the loser who got cut becuase of issue you may have outside of hockey.




Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post October 31 2011, 10:23 PM


top team of the east shutout by the midpack braves?!
OUCH


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 1 2011, 6:13 PM


GPR beat again! Looks like the slide has begun. Last place has GPR's name on it.
Leave while you can!!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 1 2011, 6:22 PM


Lol!
GPR was never going anywhere! NT embarassed them on sunday for the second time . Next time , they will sweep the series!
It's time to replace the coaching staff, they are wasting everyone's time.....and money!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 1 2011, 6:39 PM


Someone really has one on for the GP coach. Our team has faced them twice and they don't seem to be poorly coached or undisciplined. Could be a parent who's PO'd about his kid getting cut.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 2 2011, 12:22 AM


If team is as bad as person says, and his son must be real bad not to make a last place team as he suggests. Why not get over it and move on, you are obviously not on team and truth is we don't want you or your kid. Team will be fine as kids work together as a team


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 2 2011, 12:47 AM


Huskie goaltending lost to the at best average GPR.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 2 2011, 9:32 AM


HOW CAN YOU SAY lEASIDE TOP TEAM IN THE EAST. LOOKS LIKE 5 TEAMS FIGHTING FOR 1ST PLACE WITH ONLY 3 POINT DIFFERENCE!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 2 2011, 2:02 PM


GPR Coach ruins kids confidence and cant teach nothing. That's why we left not because coach cut him. He spread rumours. We left!
Other players should leave too if they have guts.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 2 2011, 2:11 PM


Team looked very disorganized against NT and having trouble scoring goals. NT beat them at all aspects of the game and will continue to do so. This team is overated and the coach is too!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 2 2011, 2:48 PM


have another vodka and relax!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 2 2011, 8:42 PM


BECAUSE LEASIDE HAS RAPED EVERYONE IN THAT RACE!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 3 2011, 7:46 AM


Not Hillcrest!!!!!!!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 3 2011, 11:03 AM


Player that left GPR were asked to leave due to poor attitudes by players and in some cases parents. Glad to hear you found another team but to continue to bash coach does nothing for anybody. Obviously was a good choice to let your son go from remarks posted


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 3 2011, 12:16 PM


A little criticism fo the coaches and the kid wilted. We're better off without you!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 3 2011, 12:21 PM


Obviously, you can't be happy with your new team since you have to keep your attention on GPR. I guess your new coach and team is soooo much better.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 3 2011, 12:40 PM


If the kid got cut from GPR I can imagine how sh itty he must be.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 3 2011, 7:48 PM


@7:46, IMO 5-1 = RAPE, but anyways....


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 4 2011, 3:12 AM


of course we won't mention that you lost to Hillcrest not once, but twice before....but anyways...


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 4 2011, 10:57 AM


did you count the players on the bench?....................but actualy...................anyways................


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 4 2011, 11:02 AM


but anyways.... you guys need to move on... like maybe to the "Hockey Parents are Idiots" forum.




Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 5 2011, 10:17 PM


Back to hockey. Congratulations to HC for showing how well the east can play!! Nice game boys!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 5 2011, 10:21 PM


Aside from top three teams in the west the rest of west are pretty ordinary and easy points for evertbody else


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 6 2011, 9:47 AM


Not true. West has more talent and skill among top 6 teams and East teams not as consistent so far.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 6 2011, 12:26 PM


You only need to look at the record of the top 5 East teams vs West so far,

Hillcrest Canadiens 3 - 0 - 0
Leaside Flames 0 - 1 - 0
North Toronto 0 - 0 - 0 (no games played)
Goulding Park Rangers 2 - 1 - 0
Willowdale Blackhawks 0 - 1 - 0

Record against the West: 5 wins, 2 losses no ties

Now look at the record of the top 6 West teams vs the East so far:

Vaughan Rangers 1 - 0 - 0
Streetsville Tigers 0 - 0 - 0 (no games played)
Humberview Huskies 0 - 1 - 0
West Mall Lightning 1 - 0 - 0
Vaughan Panthers 0 - 0 - 0 (no games played)
Mississauga Braves 1 - 1 - 0

Record against the East 3 wins, 2 losses, no ties

Hardly a case for the West being dominant; at least so far. It seems to me that on any given night, any team can beat any other team. The way it should be. All this silly nonsense about who is better is just that: nonsense. There isn't one player in this loop that will be making a career out of hockey. Just enjoy the games and good luck to all the kids.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 6 2011, 12:33 PM


wait until the east plays the top west teams and then make your case.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 6 2011, 2:47 PM


The same could be said for you, **** face.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 6 2011, 7:24 PM


what a loser, the the stats provided do show that so far pretty even, when playing against each other, keep in mind, that there are many more bad teams in the West that the top teams are feed from, other than that two divisions pretty even so far


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 8 2011, 12:19 PM


It's pretty even in my opinion. Lots of hockey still to be played.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 9 2011, 10:41 AM


Watch for HC Have not lost lately and made WBH look very ordinary


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 9 2011, 12:00 PM


Ness was the difference!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 9 2011, 12:07 PM


Best goalie in the loop. Just look at the GA.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 9 2011, 12:17 PM


The goaltending was great but it was a strong team effort with smart plays, hard work and some great passing. Good game boys.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 9 2011, 1:21 PM


WBH 32 shots vs HC 14 shots, Ness said!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 9 2011, 1:28 PM


NT,WBH and Flames do not have goaltending. That's why HC will win the division!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 9 2011, 2:40 PM


Ness best goalie in the loop......
Maybe the east loop...not even
close in the west...best goalie
in the loop plays in the west.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 9 2011, 3:45 PM


And which goalie is the best in the west?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 9 2011, 4:26 PM


If you don't know, how could you
agree!!! You will find out when we play you.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 9 2011, 4:43 PM


Ness is average at best. Goals he gave up were not the best. HC is primarily a defensive team. It's a nice thought though, HC parents.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 9 2011, 5:53 PM


Agreed. HC defence keeps team competitive. Good win over Hawks!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 9 2011, 6:15 PM


hawks are horrible...


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 9 2011, 8:01 PM


I would doubt any goalie this year better than Ness, in the West the best goals against might be Huskies, but defence make it easy for goalies


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 10 2011, 1:56 AM


How did Ness suddenly become the greatest goalie in the division?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 10 2011, 9:45 AM


he didnt because he isnt.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 10 2011, 1:41 PM


why does he play 80% of the games?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 10 2011, 2:26 PM


Maybe their #2 goalie is just that bad. Doesn't make their #1 tops in the division, just tops on their team.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 10 2011, 3:57 PM


Other goalie is much better. dont understand how ness is getting 80% of starts


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 10 2011, 5:15 PM


The East Goalies are all horrible!



Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 10 2011, 5:57 PM


Give me one example of a goalie that is better than Ness, to easy to shoot down, and not provde an example of one that is better, because there isn't


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 10 2011, 7:39 PM


the other goalie on hillcrest is way better


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 10 2011, 8:41 PM


Not so sure, and at same time nobody from the west, I would bet that the better goalies are in the East, however because not as many weak teams as in the west the East does not get a chance to pad thier goals against


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 10 2011, 9:35 PM


Ness is in the East because no team wanted him (OR HIS DAD)in the West


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 10 2011, 9:48 PM


is ness the one that use to play for the icedogs?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 10 2011, 10:15 PM


Lol ness is pretty garbage, dad is ridiculous


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 11 2011, 7:09 AM


Top goalies goalies in the west
play for Humber Valley, Vaughan
Rangers & Huskies. All better
than Ness.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 11 2011, 9:21 AM


Sure check the goals against, and you will see Hillcrest has best, also, East does not have as many weak teams, which will pad your stats, after ID and Eagles wnet there way, the division are compareable, except West has way more weak teams to prey on, from 7th down


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 11 2011, 9:42 AM


Tigers.......gp...24...g/a...38...avg...1.58
Huskies......gp...20...g/a...35...avg...1.75
V. rangers...gp...32...g/a...59...avg...1.84
Hillcrest....gp...23...g/a...44...avg...1.91

There you go.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 11 2011, 9:47 AM


GA does not equal skill you inbreds.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 11 2011, 10:42 AM


You are 100% right, but I posted those numbers
becasue thats all the previous posts talked
about.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 11 2011, 12:06 PM


No I realize that, was mainly addressing the other guy. Although it seems ness is not on top. Hmm.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 11 2011, 1:08 PM


I would say that Hillcrest is not
on top. Goals against is a team stat.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 11 2011, 5:08 PM


should use games played from gthl site and only team with better results is streetville *******


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 11 2011, 5:31 PM


convenient to only use gthl site games....cause myhockey.com has HC with 44 GA in 23 games...not quite as good as 28 GA in 15...

but since you want to be so specific....why not tell us which games Ness was in net we can all caculate his own GA


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 11 2011, 5:49 PM


guys give them a break they are 51st in ontario afterall... that's saying alot ahahaha oh by the way the 0.5556gf avg is REALLY impressive


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 12 2011, 5:21 PM


With most teams now having passed the one third mark of the season, let's see how things look in what is shaping up to be a fascinating campaign for the Midget Jr. AA East loop. Before I begin, here's a few general observations:

a) Normally, I restrict my observations to teams currently sitting in a playoff position but with the East Division down to seven teams, this becomes a real challenge. Under GTHL rules, only four teams will see post-season action and when one looks at the top five teams, there is no runaway favourite and nor is there any longshot also-ran. As of today, any one of these five teams has a chance to finish first, or be the odd-man-out come playoff time.

b) I must agree with an earlier poster who pointed out that consistency has been an elusive quality for the eastern teams thus far. That said, it's a bigger problem for some teams than for others.

c) Speaking of consistency, the biggest frustration for players, parents and coaches has been the frequency and unpredictability of the penalty calls; particularly those for head contact. I fully agree that head-hunting has no place in the game and stronger enforcement is warranted. However, in their zeal to crack down on offenders, the GTHL may have let the pendulum swing too far the other way. The new rules are not being consistently applied; possibly because the officials themselves are having difficulty adjusting. This has led to a sharp upturn in penalties (many marginal at best) that have killed the flow and momentum of the games and resulted in everyone becoming frustrated.

Now that I've got that off my chest, here's a team-by-team review of the East as at November 12th. Remember that this is the opinion of one humble observer after seeing each team play at least once. I`d be interested in hearing the comments/critiques of other posters.

1) Hillcrest Canadiens: A team on a roll. Boosted by stellar netminding and a stingy defence, HCC are the only team in the east that gives up fewer than two goals a game. Not the most talented team but they make up for it by hard work and gutsy determination. Scoring was a challenge early on but they seem to have solved that problem; outscoring their opponents 14-4 in their last four games. The missing ingredient could be toughness and physical play which could cost them down the stretch. If it's true that defensive play wins during the playoffs, then HCC could be a force to be reckoned with.

Strength: goaltending: probably the top two tenders in the loop.
Weakness: Lack of physical play that allows attacking teams to take liberties

2) Leaside Flames: Lots of speed up front and an unmatched killer instinct once they have the lead. If you give them room to skate they can hurt you as evidenced by their gaudy offensive stats (scoring 4½ goals a game). After a roaring start which saw them winning five of their first six, they seem to be plagued by the inconsistency bug of late going 3-2-2 in their last 7 which includes lopsided losses to the Braves and Aces (!).

Strength: Explosive offence that can blow any game wide open.
Weakness: Goaltending can be suspect at times.

3) North Toronto: A team that’s shown itself to be a true competitor while facing some daunting challenges. Despite several serious injuries and the "retirement" of a key offensive contributor, the depleted NT squad have gone 6-2 since October 9th. They have a very quick and effective transition that can create opportunities and may be responsible for their respectable offensive numbers. Some challenges on the back end where "soft" play results in too many scoring chances.

Strengths: A gutsy, determined work ethic combined with some admirable speed and skill
Weakness: Occasional lack of aggressiveness; particularly in the defensive zone.

4) Willowdale Blackhawks: Probably the least talented of the top five teams, WBH have achieved some success by playing an aggressive, in-your-face style of hockey that has at times confounded some of the "higher-ups" (witness wins against Hillcrest and NT , a tie against Leaside). That said, if the Hawks want to avoid being the 5th man in a 4 man race, they need to get better on their own side of the puck. Disorganized play in the defensive zone and some shaky netminding has led to the second worst GAA in the east.

Strength: Size and aggressiveness; particularly on special teams
Weakness: Defensive play in general; from the goalie on out needs to improve.

5) Goulding Park Rangers: I’m going to go out on a limb and predict that this is will be the sleeper team of the loop. A squad that is far better than its numbers indicate, GPR may not have the most talent but are easily the best balanced. Crafty forwards who know how to score, a disciplined defensive core and solid netminding; it all adds up to a team that can take it all if they can just get it all together. And this brings me to their biggest issue: INCONSISTENCY. After some pre-season tournament success, they stumbled out of the gate, then went on a 6 game rampage, outscoring their opponents 31-7 (!!!) including an eye-popping upset against the western powerhouse Huskies. Since then they're 0-2 and have been outscored 6-1. Puzzling to say the least.

Strength: A balanced lineup that can beat you any number of ways.
Weakness: The poster boy for inconsistency.

At the risk of opening myself up for ridicule, here's a quick review & prediction for upcoming matches this week:

Saturday, Goulding Park Rangers vs Toronto Aces: It won't be a 9-0 romp like the last time, but even with the rust following a long layoff, GPR should be able to put the brakes on their mini-slide and take care of business. Rangers by 3 goals.

Saturday, Leaside Flames vs Toronto Royals: I'm going to predict a high scoring affair here with the Flames coming out on top. 5-4 for Leaside.

Sunday, North Toronto vs Humberview Huskies. A gallant effort by NT will come up short. Dogs by 2 goals.

GAME OF THE WEEK: Tuesday, Leaside Flames vs Goulding Park Rangers: This one should be well worth the six dollar admission and again I'll go out on a limb and predict a low scoring win by the Rangers say, 3-2.

Wednesday, Goulding Park Rangers vs Willowdale Blackhawks: Busy week for the Rangers and I'll predict a successful one too. GPR by 2 or 3 goals.

Friday, North Toronto vs Willowdale Blackhawks: Again, I'm not sure why but I'm going to predict a very close game; possibly a tie or a 1 goal win for NT.

Saturday, Toronto Aces vs Mississauga Jets: The two last place teams of each division go head to head. I'm calling for the Aces to pick up their second win of the season with a 2-1 triumph over the hapless Jets.

Saturday, Markham Islanders vs Hillcrest Canadiens: HCC will be rusty after not playing for almost 2 weeks. They’ll win, but it might be closer than you think. Canadiens 2 Islanders 1.

To all the kids on all the teams, I say thank you for some great hockey so far. We're all looking forward to what's to come and good luck the rest of the way.



Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 12 2011, 6:49 PM


Must be a NT parent who wrote this.
Here are my observations.
1 HC- Goaltending and good work ethics but just like last year, players will not play this system for too long. Should finish top 3 for sure.
* eventually, players will not play for this coach and his verbal abuse (see last years team)
2 LF- fast forwards for sure but weak in the back end. Plays one defenseman every other shift and other d-men are not liking it and will soon fall apart. Should battle for 3rd,4th or 5th
* goaltending is weak and soft players.
3-NT- injuries have helped this team as the 1st line gets to play every other shift while the other 6 forwards rotate on the 2nd line. NT has not played any teams in the west and will be in for a big suprise when they do. Goaltending is mediocre and has a weak defense.
* one line can't keep on winning and weak defense
4-Probably the best team on paper and started off strong in the Hillcrest Tournament. Goaltending is the biggest problem on this team.
* goaltending and penalties continue to hurt this team
5-This is where I agree with the above post. GPR will finish 1st as they do have solid goaltending and d-men. Even though one line does most of the goal scoring the other 2 lines work hard and never give up. They are the only team in the East who have played more games against the West teams and have done very against them.
* the most balanced team so far and when we have all played each other equally they will be on top. 1st Place!!!




Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 12 2011, 7:00 PM


Obviously a GPR parent.LOL


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 12 2011, 7:09 PM


I think their both GP parents but who cares. at least they talk hockey and dont trash the kids. Good Posts.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 12 2011, 9:15 PM


WBH does seem to have a weak goalie so far,
HC looking strong in net.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 13 2011, 10:00 AM


Agree with post. Watched many east games this year and have to agree with the summary. HC very good defensively. Solid defence and best keepers. Still think that MI can make a move, cant understand why their record so bad. Have size, skate well some forwards can score.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 13 2011, 10:46 AM


10:00 its called a team SPORT. Need the chemistry between the TEAM to WIN.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 13 2011, 11:21 AM


Nov 12 5:21 - Thank you for the well balanced and non-malicious commentary. It's nice to see discussion on the respective teams without resorting to attacks on individuals.

For the most part, I think your observations are bang on. Good call on the GPR/ACES game. You got that one dead on. If the rest of predictions come true, I'll be looking to you for Sportsline picks.

One other comment I'd make, is that the top end east teams should be able to compete very well against the west. Despite many posters who claim the West is a far superiour division, I don't see any of their teams be run-away favourites. The Vaughan Rangers, Tigers, Huskies and Westmall are all strong teams for sure. But any of one of the top east teams could steal wins from them if they bring a solid effort.

The NT/Huskies game should be interesting and could be difficult to predict. The Huskies have stumbled as of late. Lots of talent on this team but struggle to play as a team. NT has the offensive punch to do some damage against them, but Huskies speed and physical play could overwhelm NT's defense.

The LF/GPR game should also be an interesting one. The smaller ice surface at St. Mikes (and being the home team) could favour LF. GPR will need to play physical with LF to stop their offensive power. GPR will also need to put up a solid performance in net if they are to come out with a win. Again, tough one to call but odds probably favour LF.

Willowdale and Markham need to start notching up more wins by strong defensive play and net minding if they are going to challenge for the last playoff spot. I think both could do it but have some work ahead of them if they are to get there.

Your read on HC is pretty fair. Hard working team. Maybe not the most talented on D and F, but shows you how effective a team can be when playing as a unit. (Huskies take note). They have done a reasonable job of keeping the GA down against teams that can score (like LF, NT) but have yet to play any of the top end West teams. Will be interesting to see if their goaltending can perform as well against Huskies on Nov 25.

I'll add my thanks to all the coaches and players for an enjoyable season of hockey thus far. And encourage the fans posting on N54 to stay positive and resist getting drawn into attacks on individual players or the people volunteering their time so that our kids can keep playing the game that they love.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 14 2011, 1:48 AM


now we can see the real picture. 7-1 NT loss to HH. That is why the standings is all screwed up and no one knows who will finish 1st in the East or make it in the top 4. To much veriables still. NT's 1st game vs West.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 14 2011, 8:45 PM


I'm very happy to see the positive comments and assessments from the above posters. We certainly need more of that on this site. The fact remains that we are seeing some good hockey with some good old and new rivalries. Thanks to the players and coaches for allowing us to get our monies worth! Keep up the good work!



Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 14 2011, 8:56 PM


NT can only win when they play at NT arena. The refs are always favoring them there.
Those are the facts! Ask around and see what the other teams tell you.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post November 14 2011, 8:59 PM


HH spanked NT bad! Huskies are dominant and NT are pretenders, east teams can't get it done against the west.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: You were saying.....
No score for this post February 27 2012, 4:39 PM



No score for this post November 12 2011, 5:21 PM


With most teams now having passed the one third mark of the season, let's see how things look in what is shaping up to be a fascinating campaign for the Midget Jr. AA East loop. Before I begin, here's a few general observations:

a) Normally, I restrict my observations to teams currently sitting in a playoff position but with the East Division down to seven teams, this becomes a real challenge. Under GTHL rules, only four teams will see post-season action and when one looks at the top five teams, there is no runaway favourite and nor is there any longshot also-ran. As of today, any one of these five teams has a chance to finish first, or be the odd-man-out come playoff time.

b) I must agree with an earlier poster who pointed out that consistency has been an elusive quality for the eastern teams thus far. That said, it's a bigger problem for some teams than for others.

c) Speaking of consistency, the biggest frustration for players, parents and coaches has been the frequency and unpredictability of the penalty calls; particularly those for head contact. I fully agree that head-hunting has no place in the game and stronger enforcement is warranted. However, in their zeal to crack down on offenders, the GTHL may have let the pendulum swing too far the other way. The new rules are not being consistently applied; possibly because the officials themselves are having difficulty adjusting. This has led to a sharp upturn in penalties (many marginal at best) that have killed the flow and momentum of the games and resulted in everyone becoming frustrated.

Now that I've got that off my chest, here's a team-by-team review of the East as at November 12th. Remember that this is the opinion of one humble observer after seeing each team play at least once. I`d be interested in hearing the comments/critiques of other posters.

1) Hillcrest Canadiens: A team on a roll. Boosted by stellar netminding and a stingy defence, HCC are the only team in the east that gives up fewer than two goals a game. Not the most talented team but they make up for it by hard work and gutsy determination. Scoring was a challenge early on but they seem to have solved that problem; outscoring their opponents 14-4 in their last four games. The missing ingredient could be toughness and physical play which could cost them down the stretch. If it's true that defensive play wins during the playoffs, then HCC could be a force to be reckoned with.

Strength: goaltending: probably the top two tenders in the loop.
Weakness: Lack of physical play that allows attacking teams to take liberties

2) Leaside Flames: Lots of speed up front and an unmatched killer instinct once they have the lead. If you give them room to skate they can hurt you as evidenced by their gaudy offensive stats (scoring 4½ goals a game). After a roaring start which saw them winning five of their first six, they seem to be plagued by the inconsistency bug of late going 3-2-2 in their last 7 which includes lopsided losses to the Braves and Aces (!).

Strength: Explosive offence that can blow any game wide open.
Weakness: Goaltending can be suspect at times.

3) North Toronto: A team that’s shown itself to be a true competitor while facing some daunting challenges. Despite several serious injuries and the "retirement" of a key offensive contributor, the depleted NT squad have gone 6-2 since October 9th. They have a very quick and effective transition that can create opportunities and may be responsible for their respectable offensive numbers. Some challenges on the back end where "soft" play results in too many scoring chances.

Strengths: A gutsy, determined work ethic combined with some admirable speed and skill
Weakness: Occasional lack of aggressiveness; particularly in the defensive zone.

4) Willowdale Blackhawks: Probably the least talented of the top five teams, WBH have achieved some success by playing an aggressive, in-your-face style of hockey that has at times confounded some of the "higher-ups" (witness wins against Hillcrest and NT , a tie against Leaside). That said, if the Hawks want to avoid being the 5th man in a 4 man race, they need to get better on their own side of the puck. Disorganized play in the defensive zone and some shaky netminding has led to the second worst GAA in the east.

Strength: Size and aggressiveness; particularly on special teams
Weakness: Defensive play in general; from the goalie on out needs to improve.

5) Goulding Park Rangers: I’m going to go out on a limb and predict that this is will be the sleeper team of the loop. A squad that is far better than its numbers indicate, GPR may not have the most talent but are easily the best balanced. Crafty forwards who know how to score, a disciplined defensive core and solid netminding; it all adds up to a team that can take it all if they can just get it all together. And this brings me to their biggest issue: INCONSISTENCY. After some pre-season tournament success, they stumbled out of the gate, then went on a 6 game rampage, outscoring their opponents 31-7 (!!!) including an eye-popping upset against the western powerhouse Huskies. Since then they're 0-2 and have been outscored 6-1. Puzzling to say the least.

Strength: A balanced lineup that can beat you any number of ways.
Weakness: The poster boy for inconsistency.

At the risk of opening myself up for ridicule, here's a quick review & prediction for upcoming matches this week:

Saturday, Goulding Park Rangers vs Toronto Aces: It won't be a 9-0 romp like the last time, but even with the rust following a long layoff, GPR should be able to put the brakes on their mini-slide and take care of business. Rangers by 3 goals.

Saturday, Leaside Flames vs Toronto Royals: I'm going to predict a high scoring affair here with the Flames coming out on top. 5-4 for Leaside.

Sunday, North Toronto vs Humberview Huskies. A gallant effort by NT will come up short. Dogs by 2 goals.

GAME OF THE WEEK: Tuesday, Leaside Flames vs Goulding Park Rangers: This one should be well worth the six dollar admission and again I'll go out on a limb and predict a low scoring win by the Rangers say, 3-2.

Wednesday, Goulding Park Rangers vs Willowdale Blackhawks: Busy week for the Rangers and I'll predict a successful one too. GPR by 2 or 3 goals.

Friday, North Toronto vs Willowdale Blackhawks: Again, I'm not sure why but I'm going to predict a very close game; possibly a tie or a 1 goal win for NT.

Saturday, Toronto Aces vs Mississauga Jets: The two last place teams of each division go head to head. I'm calling for the Aces to pick up their second win of the season with a 2-1 triumph over the hapless Jets.

Saturday, Markham Islanders vs Hillcrest Canadiens: HCC will be rusty after not playing for almost 2 weeks. They’ll win, but it might be closer than you think. Canadiens 2 Islanders 1.

To all the kids on all the teams, I say thank you for some great hockey so far. We're all looking forward to what's to come and good luck the rest of the way.



Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message



Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post November 14 2011, 10:18 PM


Top three forwards and two d are missing for next couple of games at least, should be easy time for teams, until they get everyone back


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post November 14 2011, 11:22 PM


all teams are missing top 3 forwards and D men, not just NT!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post November 14 2011, 11:55 PM


was talking about GPR due to injures


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post November 15 2011, 10:27 AM


Top 3 forwards and 2 Dmen???
Sure thing. What next? The lighting in the arena is too dim


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post November 15 2011, 3:08 PM


NT is overated. Hillcrest will win the east, hands down.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post November 16 2011, 9:36 AM


Nov 12 5:21 - Looking back at your predictions so far....


1) Saturday, Goulding Park Rangers vs Toronto Aces: It won't be a 9-0 romp like the last time, but even with the rust following a long layoff, GPR should be able to put the brakes on their mini-slide and take care of business. Rangers by 3 goals.

You got this one right. 3-0 for Goulding. Aces have been improving in Novemeber,thanks to solid goal tending and better defensive effort. If they can muster some offensive strength, they could start ending up on the winning side of the game sheet.


2) Saturday, Leaside Flames vs Toronto Royals: I'm going to predict a high scoring affair here with the Flames coming out on top. 5-4 for Leaside.

Leaside came out on top as expected. But their sharp shooters were in full force scoring 9 to the Royals 3. Leaside continues to show they can put the puck in the net with an impressive 4.5 GF avg per game. Question mark continues to be their net minding/defense at 2.9 GAA.


3) Sunday, North Toronto vs Humberview Huskies. A gallant effort by NT will come up short. Dogs by 2 goals.

Huskies were barking and biting in this one in a 7-1 drubbing of NT. If the rumours are true, the return of Huskies former captain after a brief trial at AAA will only add to the Huskies offensive talent. As always with the Huskies, question is whether JQ can get his players to play as a team and not just a talented collection of individuals.


4) GAME OF THE WEEK: Tuesday, Leaside Flames vs Goulding Park Rangers: This one should be well worth the six dollar admission and again I'll go out on a limb and predict a low scoring win by the Rangers say, 3-2.

Goulding came out firing in this one, in a convincing 5-1 victory over Leaside. Comments about Goulding be a balanced team from back-to-front rang true in this one, as did Leaside's soft spot (goal tending).


So far you're 4-for-4 on predicting the right team to win the games, but scores have been a little off. Consistency continues to be a big factor in this division. Any team that fails to show up and put in a good effort will likely end up paying for it.

Good luck to all teams in your games for the balance of the week. I'll check in after the weekend to see how the rest of your predictions unfolded.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post November 16 2011, 11:00 AM


Thats because there are no good goalies left. HC are the only team with a goalie but do not have the players. Will be an interesting season to see who comes out on top. Any of the 6 teams can finish top 4 and any team still has a chance at 1st place. LF are not as good as they think.



Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post November 16 2011, 12:22 PM


GTHL has become a soft league. Why is old style Hockey still going on in the OMHS, Alliance and in the States. No wonder we aren't producing many players to the NHL.
I heard one Scout say that when the drafted players go play in the OHL that they can't handle the rough stuff and that they also don't like taking players from the GTHL. Would rather take the tougher kids out West and from the States. Burke is showing us what is starting to happen by taking all these American players. Wake up G and bring back the old Hockey to help prepare these players for the OHL.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post November 16 2011, 12:28 PM


Hahaha dad keeps posting about HC goaltending, adorable.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post November 16 2011, 1:01 PM


HC goalie dad must be winning a lot of friends amongst the other HC parents. Nothin say lovin like throwin all the D and F under the bus. I'm sure they'll all stand up for him the way Miller's team did.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post November 16 2011, 1:22 PM


Ness (Hillcrest) vs Huskies Nov 25.....
Should be fun!!!!!!!!!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post November 16 2011, 2:37 PM


Huskies will not score more than 2 goals in that game.



Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post November 16 2011, 2:46 PM


You must be dellusional, if you think Husky goalie is any good, asthe only one that thinks he is good is his dad


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post November 16 2011, 3:42 PM


You have alot to say about the
Huskies goalie dad, why don't you
tell him face to what you of him
on the 25th


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post November 16 2011, 5:39 PM


Both Huskies goalies are very good. No need to bring in another. Bad move on coach's part.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post November 16 2011, 5:52 PM


Agree, tell the players to start scoring more and defend better in their own end.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post November 16 2011, 6:14 PM


sorry niss, partys over you cannot beat huskies with your team


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post November 16 2011, 7:12 PM


I will, and by the way GPR beat you guys, and HC beat GPR, so don't be so sure *******


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post November 16 2011, 7:15 PM


oh my god... shut the f*ck up!!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post November 16 2011, 11:51 PM


fair enough, find out the hard way friendo


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post November 17 2011, 8:08 AM


Ahhaahhahaahaha parents are so ******* gay


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post November 17 2011, 4:52 PM


First of all, GPR was lucky to beat HH because the refs helped them win. Secondly, just because you beat GPR, who is inconsistent at best, doesn't mean you can beat the Huskies! Prepare to be beat up badly.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post November 17 2011, 4:58 PM


Nobody beats HC badly!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post November 17 2011, 5:00 PM


GPR beat HH because goalies suck!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post November 17 2011, 5:09 PM


You mean that they played
bvoth goalies at the same time?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post November 17 2011, 5:20 PM


Making broad statements about a team based on one game is stupid. Any team can be "on" for one game or "off" for another. Yes, GPR beat HH one game but HH beat GPR in pre-season. Both have suffered from inconsistency but are generally solid teams as their Ontario Rank over +20 games or their GAA over 14-15 league games suggests. Likewise, HC is neither a crap team nor the cream of the crop.

The match-up between HC and HH should be a good one. I doubt either team will take the other for granted.

And yes, let's hope the ref's call a good game and let the boys play!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post November 17 2011, 6:20 PM


Refs are usually not the issue, but more about Huskies thinking the refs are always against them, game will be a good one, just expect Huskies to complain when HC starts hitting them hard


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post November 17 2011, 6:55 PM


Neither of these teams are overly physical.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post November 17 2011, 10:15 PM


face it,hc will still be in over their heads when they play hh



Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post November 18 2011, 12:00 AM


You must be kidding, you do realize HH is a forth place team, where the gained many of thier points from bottom end teams


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post November 18 2011, 8:49 AM


Maybe "Hillcrest" sb "HighCrest"...cause you gotta be smoking something if you think HC is going to walk all over HH.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post November 18 2011, 9:19 AM


No offence to Hillcrest, but we got
a mountain to climb on Sunday before
we even get you on our radar.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post November 19 2011, 10:07 AM


Score from the Hawks game?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Shake-out
No score for this post November 19 2011, 10:10 AM


HH will implode on Sunday, have not played team with probably best defensive system in loop. SHould be interesting




Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Score from Hawks game
No score for this post November 19 2011, 11:25 AM


Hawks played a great game with solid goaltending to take the game 3-2. It was 3-1 until with 1 miinute left and the goalie pulled while on the power play, NT scored with the 6 on 4 advantage.

Hawks did a good job of staying out of the penalty box. They will need to keep doing that to move up the rankings.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post November 19 2011, 2:57 PM


Funny how quite NT is when they loose, but if they win they're on here telling everyone how fantastic they are.




Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post November 19 2011, 3:00 PM


Unfortunately the HC goalie dad keeps yappin about his kid whether they win or lose. Its just if they lose he just adds to it by throwing the rest of the team under the bus.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post November 19 2011, 3:07 PM


how do they lose to willowdale... who are awful


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post November 19 2011, 3:58 PM


Goaltending.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post November 19 2011, 9:55 PM


If you notice the loss for NT was on road, they usually win at home, with smaller arena, and refs in thier back pockets. NT will not make playoffs Willowdale will pas them soon


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post November 20 2011, 7:32 AM


Top 5 vs each other

NT Wins - GPR WBH HC LOSS - WBH WBH LF TIES - HC
HC WINS - LF GPR NT WBH LOSS - GPR WBH NT LF TIES NT
WBH WINS NT HC NT LOSS - LF LF GPR HC NT TIES - LF
GPR WINS HC LF WBH LOSS - NT LF NT HC TIES 0
LF WINS WBH GPR NT WBH HC NT LOSS HC GPR TIES WBH
AND LOST TO ACES AND TIED ISLANDERS.
NO TEAM IS GOOD, NO TEAM ARE THE BEST, ALL 5 TEAMS ARE EQUALL RIGHT NOW. ANYONE CAN WIN.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post November 20 2011, 11:43 AM


Good analysis. Top 4 will make playoffs and anyones guess how that will go.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post November 21 2011, 12:14 AM


Just like I said, wait till NT plays teams in the West and we will see the true picture. Lost to the Braves and Flames lose to the Sharks. West too strong for the East.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post November 21 2011, 1:14 AM


saw the islanders canadiens game, islanders were up 3-1 but gave up lead in third due to week goals against.. can't figure them out


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post November 21 2011, 7:45 AM


canadiens are not that good. they had the back up goalie in net too.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post November 21 2011, 7:59 AM


you mean Ness?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post November 21 2011, 10:12 AM


There is no backup goalie on the Canadiens the goaltending is split 50/50. Obviously someone not involved with the team is trying to stir the pot.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post November 21 2011, 4:10 PM


Well it looks like some people just never learn. Let the boys play and the teams that deserve to make the playoffs will.
in the meantime, enjoy the games.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post November 21 2011, 4:19 PM


Hawks Rock and GPR, NT and LF suck!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post November 21 2011, 4:46 PM


People in glass houses... shouldn't use the work "rock" too often. Hawks are very "rock" like indeed ... move about as fast, sink like a stone, hands of stone... you get the idea.

GFA of 0.4082 puts them 15th of 19 Midget Jr teams. Ontario ranking puts them 67th of 85 teams. With stats like that, I'm sure the Vaughan Rangers are terrified about playing them Sunday....LOL


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post November 21 2011, 4:53 PM


To 4:10: Well said. Thank you.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post November 21 2011, 5:21 PM


Why do people put "lol" in caps? You guys realize you look hilariously incompetent when you do that crap?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post November 21 2011, 5:23 PM


Additionally, the "rock" themed post was neither clever nor amusing. Hawks are clearly the best team in the entire GTHL in all age groups. Ya'll haters are just jealous of our swag.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post November 21 2011, 5:37 PM


November 12 2011, 5:21 PM

Remember that great post. Lets see how the predictions and results stacked up....

1) Saturday, Goulding Park Rangers vs Toronto Aces: Rangers by 3 goals.
Result: GP 3 - TA 0

2) Saturday, Leaside Flames vs Toronto Royals: a high scoring affair 5-4 for Leaside.
Result: LF 9 - TR 3

3) Sunday, North Toronto vs Humberview Huskies. NT will come up short. Dogs by 2 goals.
Result: HH 7 - NT 1

4) Tuesday, Leaside Flames vs Goulding Park Rangers: a low scoring win by the Rangers say, 3-2.
Result: GP 5 - LF 1

5) Wednesday, Goulding Park Rangers vs Willowdale Blackhawks: GPR by 2 or 3 goals.
Result: GP 3- WBH 0

6) Friday, North Toronto vs Willowdale Blackhawks: a very close game; possibly a tie or a 1 goal win for NT.
Result: WBH 3 - NT 2

7) Saturday, Toronto Aces vs Mississauga Jets: Aces pick up second win with a 2-1 triumph over the hapless Jets.
Result: ACES 2 - JETS 1

8) Saturday, Markham Islanders vs Hillcrest Canadiens: HCC will win, but it might be closer than you think. Canadiens 2 Islanders 1.
Result: HC 4 - MI 3


SUMMARY - You got 7 of 8 on picking the winning team, three games you got the scores exactly right, two you got the spread right and on three the spread was quite a bit larger than you thought it would be. Overall, I'd say great job on the comments and predictions.


UPCOMING GAMES OF THE WEEK: Have to be Friday's match ups. Huskies vs Hillcrest and Leaside vs Westmall.
What are your thoughts?







Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post November 23 2011, 7:48 PM


nice to see the East side not bashing players and coaches like last year. All the crazy parents left.
Baggata, Gene,Chow,Higgins,the SY Bruins clan,marsbar. Have I missed anyone else? LMAO


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post November 23 2011, 9:14 PM


Ya, YOU!!!!!!!LMAO!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post November 24 2011, 12:31 PM


That's because the east teams suck!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post November 26 2011, 7:35 PM


I Saw the Hillcrest game against the Huskies last night. It was one of the best games I've seen this year. Lots of action, great rushes, some great saves and cleanly played by both teams. Congrats to the Hillcrest team for showing that the east can play against the top western teams and hold their own.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post November 27 2011, 10:11 AM


Anyone know the score of the Friday night game between Leaside and West Mall? Still not posted.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post November 27 2011, 10:54 AM


Leaside and West Mall also skated to a 2 - 2 tie. Sounds like a good game like the HC HH game. West is still better but some East teams can play.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post November 29 2011, 12:44 AM


East teams have no chance against the west. HC LF NT and GPR all are pretenders!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post November 29 2011, 6:29 PM


Nag, nag, nag. Leave the east teams alone, they will be just fine against the west. Check the results so far.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post November 30 2011, 1:16 PM


Who gets last playoff spot? Islanders or Aces? Which is the better team?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post November 30 2011, 2:20 PM


Only the top 4 advance. LF, HC, GP, NT will likely take it. WBH could challenge NT for last spot. Don't see either MI or TA making it.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post November 30 2011, 4:21 PM


GPR won't make it. WBH are a better team and will pass them down the stretch.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post November 30 2011, 4:52 PM


Ya okay. Nothing says "Great" like a 9-0 loss (ST)... or even better a 10-0 loss (VR)


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post November 30 2011, 5:39 PM


atleast GPR could score against ST and VR


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post November 30 2011, 8:44 PM


east teams in the myhockeyrankings are pathetic the only "respectable" rank is gpr at 36 and that's not saying much


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post December 1 2011, 8:07 AM


MI will catch WBH for the final playoff spot. Team is getting better and have ability to score some goals. Goalkeeping as usual will be the big factor


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post December 1 2011, 9:13 AM


MI will catch all the east teams except GPR..Gpr 1st MI 2nd. Just watch and see.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post December 1 2011, 10:00 AM


Either someone is on crack or they're just trying to stir up crap.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post December 1 2011, 10:29 AM


MI is like 10 points back, good luck.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post December 1 2011, 1:31 PM


Yes, but GPR will fall like a rock and be in the bsmt.
They are brutal!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post December 1 2011, 1:39 PM


It's not the team that bad, it's the coaching staff. Especially the head coach, he doesn't know hockey and the truth is showing. The players won't learn anything from him. Trust me, I know.
I thought GPR was going to replace him? What happeneed to the parent complaints?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post December 1 2011, 2:35 PM


Re: GP Coach - There were no parent complaints. If you were so "in the know" then you would have known that. So forgive us if we're not apt to trust you. Its pretty obvious you're just trying to stir up crap.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post December 2 2011, 1:36 PM


Only top 4 advance - LF HC WBH,GPR. MI will battle with NT for 5th. Can't see the Aces do much better.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post December 2 2011, 1:57 PM


What's all the talk about GPR Coach? My kid played for him for 2 seasons and he was a good coach. Has something changed?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post December 2 2011, 3:07 PM


Yea you left.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post December 2 2011, 4:14 PM


MI will battle NT for fourth spot. WBH will fade away.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post December 2 2011, 4:41 PM


MI has the individual talent but they play as individuals.......


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post December 2 2011, 5:05 PM


especially the forwards. several good skaters but they do not finish well. defence is weak.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post December 2 2011, 7:27 PM


teams is full of hawks has beens


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post December 3 2011, 1:35 PM


Hawks got rocked last night. What happened?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post December 3 2011, 5:14 PM


3 hopeless deflection goals, plus an empty netter halfway through the game because the coach thought it would be a good idea to pull the goalie on a PP with 10 mins left.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post December 3 2011, 10:00 PM


If you know anything about hockey you would know good idea, to pull goalie, were losing anyway, if could score a goal, would be back in game, whether you lose 3-1 or 7-1 no difference for sure will beat them next time, and still lots of time for playoffs


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post December 4 2011, 2:32 PM


HC pulling away playing great defensive hockey. will win east


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post December 4 2011, 10:25 PM


Scores from today?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post December 4 2011, 11:02 PM


GP 2 - MB 1


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post December 5 2011, 11:34 AM


Keep dreaming.....in colour!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post December 5 2011, 11:45 AM


GPR going nowhere. Lucky win against MB last night. They got completely outplayed.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post December 5 2011, 4:30 PM


Agree. GPR is overated and there are many teams better than them. Second half will tell the tale for this team, they will fade like your old jeans.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post December 5 2011, 5:05 PM


GPR may not be the strongest and definitely have things to work on. But the same could be said of any team other than perhaps Streetsville (who are the best of the division in my opinion).

GPR have proven they can be competitive - although suffer from inconsistency. They will make the playoffs. But after that, it's anyone's guess as playoffs are a whole new season.




Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post December 5 2011, 9:41 PM


GPR not overrated, are playing competitive, biggest issue is inconsistent, I would consider them a good team, could finish top two in east, for some reason there are some GPR haters who seem to need to get a life though Game against MB was anyones game good win for GPR they have proved over and over again that they can be competitive against any team in the east or west assuming they make the playoffs should be interesting


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post December 5 2011, 10:34 PM


WHO IS DOING ALL OF THIS RATING? WHO DECIDES WHEN A GTHL TEAM IS UNDER RATED?? hahahaha


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Score from Hawks game
No score for this post December 6 2011, 7:30 AM


Chow from GPR!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) WBH
No score for this post December 7 2011, 12:10 PM


I notice WBH beat the Braves last night....good for the Hawks and the east !


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 7 2011, 11:21 PM


GPR spanks HC what happened to ness ? i thought hes the best


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 7 2011, 11:38 PM


Ness only played the third and gave up 2. We just didn't bring it tonight.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 7 2011, 11:38 PM


Other goalie played. Wasn't his fault though Team had an off night.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 8 2011, 12:39 AM


excuses excuses Hillcrest


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 8 2011, 9:39 AM


Ness is still the best, anyone can have an off night GPR was really lucky, won't happen again


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 8 2011, 10:22 PM


GPR got lucky? are you kidding me!?! GPR is the only team that has proven to be able to beat West teams as oppose to hillcrest who can only beat lower end east teams.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 9 2011, 12:42 AM


Get your fact's right.

Hillcrest vs NT w-1, L-1, T-1
vs WBH w-1, L-1
vs MI W-2, T-1
vs TA W-1
vs LF w-1, L-1
Still has to play V Rangers, West Mall and Streetsville HC will end up 4th

Look at who the teams in the East have played so far and you will see by the end of the season the standings will be completly different with GPR 1st.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 9 2011, 8:29 AM


Who cares who finishes first as long as team finishes in playoff position. The teams are very evenly matched and in playoffs anyone of top four teams can be top of the east. North Toronto seems to be slipping out of picture My guess is WBH will finish forth and could win it all in east


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 9 2011, 10:49 AM


I agree re WBH ...they are a big fast team built for the playoffs


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 9 2011, 11:23 AM


With an impressive 0.38 GF Avg and ranked 68th in Ontario, WBH are built for something but it isn't the playoffs.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 9 2011, 11:46 AM


Same could have been said about Boston Bruins, look at them now. This is the year of WBH, and not just the east


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 9 2011, 3:38 PM


didnt streestsville beat them 9-0 and vaughan rangers beat them 10-0?
talk about a playoff team ! you were bitch slapped
beyond out classed


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 9 2011, 4:43 PM


Did Bruins not lose at begining of season, and then went on a streak, long season my friend, for you sake let's hope you don't play us again your stars will be hearing the footsteps behind them and won't want to touch the puck Remember what happened during playoffs last year where Eagles made ID look like cowards and now same players are on your team


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 9 2011, 11:27 PM


Difference is that WBH arent the boston bruins or Eagles. They're the team that lost 9-0, 10-0, 7-1, 7-2, and 5-0, have absolutely no goaltending, slow defense, and theyre best forward gets atleast 4 penalties per game...


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 10 2011, 8:35 AM


11:27 has WBH's number(s)


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 10 2011, 10:02 AM


See, 11:27 is a little off in his ranting, which leads me to believe he has watched WBH play maybe once or twice and is making broad assumptions based on that and some scores. Slow defense? I would suggest it's one of the faster groups in the league. No goaltending? This one's a little trickier. There are some nights where the team just collapses in font of a netminder, and that has definitely happened more than once with WBH. While it should strive to produce consistent numbers, if is far from hopeless.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 10 2011, 10:45 AM


Hawks have some good defencemen, but if you compare them to the defence on HC or LF they are very slow. Forwards have good size and can score, and latest additions will help


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 10 2011, 10:48 AM


do any of you people have jobs.





Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 10 2011, 4:14 PM


Latest additions? Who did WBH pick up?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 10 2011, 6:10 PM


4:43 Scarborough did go on a run. But they also lost to that ID team 8-1 and 7-0 last year. And your calling those players cowards.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 11 2011, 12:32 AM


Hillcrest must learn how to lose 1st. 2 players were givin GM's during the game. A team of sucks and baby's. Who said they have defense,LOL. The team only has one thing, NESS thats it.



Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 11 2011, 12:35 AM


Someone watching the Hawks too much. Must be a perv!
None- the- less, GPR will finish 1st as Hillcrest can't beat them. I agree with the above post. WBH and GPR are built for the playoffs.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 11 2011, 10:55 AM


Whoever keeps pimping ness is insane. He looked so average in the WBH game it hurt. You could argue that all three goals were soft.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 11 2011, 10:58 AM


If NT can ever put their bench together they will be a threat. Also built for playoffs but need top players back.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 11 2011, 2:32 PM


Ness had no defense helping him. He makes the 1st save and the Defense weren't there to help. If Ness were on GPR they would be unbeatable.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 11 2011, 3:20 PM


except by any top 5 team in the West


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 11 2011, 4:23 PM


lets see... he fumbles a clear point shot, leaving the puck in the crease. goal. second one I missed. third one, 2 on 1, player shoots a weak shot off the rush, close to the ice, not very powerful at all, right into the net. he is HARDLY top calibre.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 12 2011, 1:29 AM


I saw that game - second goal was a wrap around. Ness got frozen by the WBH player and just didn't get across the crease.

Pretty easy save to make. I agree - he's not all that.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 12 2011, 8:53 AM


WBH handled NT easily last night.I would not count WBH out and are gaining some momentum,a very balanced team now with all lines capable of scoring. NT dressing room seemed to implode last night as well with coach throwing sticks around


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 12 2011, 9:16 AM


Anybody that watched game last night must agree NT is done, and playoff teams are now in place not much chance of NT getting in unless Leaside implodes, WBH should finish top two


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 12 2011, 12:09 PM


NT has coaching and player issues and will sink like a stone in the standings.
GPR has horseshoes and will lose in the first round of the playoffs.
LF have no heart and will get spanked.
HC have nothing except the best goalie and can't score.
WBH are coming together at the right time and will win the east!
Enough siad.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 12 2011, 2:04 PM


12:09 is either Mr. Ness - touting his kid's abilities while throwing the rest of the team under the bus, or a delusional WBH Dad.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 12 2011, 4:21 PM


His kid has no abilities.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 12 2011, 5:38 PM


12:09 has issues, period!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 13 2011, 1:51 AM


It has to be the WBH goalie dad his kid is getting the majority of the games and it gone to his head.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 13 2011, 9:05 AM


That's been known to happen before.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 13 2011, 9:06 AM


GPR 1st all the way. I think they have the best goalie with LF 2nd, well balanced team, WBH 3rd - too many penalties will not get them top 2. HC 4th, no d and no offence but will get by 1st round with the goaltender.
Thats the way it is!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 13 2011, 11:54 AM


lmfao^ i swear your retarded. You think GPR's the best team while thinking that HC has 'no forwards and defense' and will finish 4th, making it past the first round. That means that theyll have to have beaten GPR.....the so called best team with "no forwards and defense" and against the "best goalie in the league".

Everything you just said contradicts itself.



Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 13 2011, 1:07 PM


Who cares, make the playoffs, and then best team will come out of division. pretty simple I believe. Top 4 teams are pretty close and depending on who gets hot and stays hot will determine who finishes first. personaly you can have first as long as we win in playoffs


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 13 2011, 1:51 PM


Both 11:54 and 1:07 make valid points. Goal #1 is to make the playoffs. Goal #2 is to win the playoffs.

Timing (for getting hot as a team) is everything.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 13 2011, 11:27 PM


HC will win the east by slim margin. GPR will be close and then LF and WBH


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 14 2011, 8:51 AM


Ok, and that will mean what, does not matter only matters is who wins the last game


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 14 2011, 10:29 AM


Finishing 4th vs 5th has big implications this year. I don't think TA or MI will be able to close the gap on the rest. Even if NT continues to slide, MI would still need to gain 8 points over them. Possible, but not likely.

Top two are likely to be LF or GP. HC/WBH/NT will battle for 3rd - 5th.

HC lacks scoring, WHB lacks discipline/defense/goaltending, and NT is just too inconsistent.

Positioning of final standings (top 4) will be important depending on which team you'd rather face in the first round. Underdogs could certainly surprise and take out the favoured team. And division final should be a good match-up.

Unfortunately the winner will likely have their hands full against the top west team (likely ST or VR). Both teams are strong and likely stronger than our best east teams. Again, I wouldn't rule out a surprise finish, but the odds aren't in the east's favour.

Just my thoughts.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 14 2011, 11:08 AM


Well said and honest analysis


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 14 2011, 12:50 PM


Let's see what happens!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 14 2011, 1:20 PM


WBH's recent surge has been starting to change the teams out-look. With 7 out of a possible 8 points and a win over the Braves plus a crushing of NT 6-1, discipline/goaltending/defense has not looked like an issue.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 14 2011, 3:16 PM


they still suck


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 14 2011, 3:22 PM


in 3 games against the top 2 west teams they have been outscored 28-0
but lookout they're a contender ! ahahah they're ****



Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 14 2011, 4:09 PM


You mean in 2 games the top 2 west teams have outscored them 19-0 .learn how to count you stupid dum s... Ahahahahahah


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 14 2011, 4:35 PM


dont be hasty to discount WBH,this is a new club,not perfect, but the culture is becoming one of "expecting to win" versus just showing up. All forward lines can score and defense is big and mobile.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 14 2011, 5:18 PM


If you mean that WBH is a "new club" because they changed a lot of players this season, well so did most other teams. It's getting a little late in the season to still be using the "they're still getting to know eachother" excuse.

Looking at MyHockey as a measure of WBH's peformance, they are sitting at 8.6 for the season and averaged only an 8.5 over the past 10 games. To their credit, their last three games were much better - averaging 11.5.

All we can say is, congrats on your last three outings. Keep up the good work. But you'll have to maintain that performance a while longer before you'll make believers of everyone.




Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 14 2011, 5:30 PM


check the preseason theyve played the rangers twice


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 14 2011, 5:56 PM


All that was said was that they looked better as of late. Nobody claimed they would climb to the top of the standings or win the east, let alone the west.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 14 2011, 6:41 PM


OK CHOW get off this site already


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 16 2011, 9:12 AM


Leaside on a roll now. Back on top and will win the East hands down. A well balanced team with the best forwards in the East.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 16 2011, 10:16 AM


Must be on a roll, I mean you beat three lousy teams, and have played more than anyone else, why not come back with you comments when season is over and suggest how great you are. In short no one thinks you are any good except you


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 20 2011, 4:12 PM


Pick only one player from each team.
East All Star Team

G Ness HC
D Delaney LF
D Mackenzie WBH
F Piorkoski GPR
F Myre NT
F Lupo MI



Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 20 2011, 5:17 PM


Thanks Ness' Dad


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 20 2011, 5:18 PM


d-keon-ac......


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 20 2011, 7:55 PM


Hilarious!! Not one GPR player???


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 20 2011, 9:31 PM


How could anyone pick ness, I am sure there are way better goalies then ness, seems to always have problems when playing better teams, same issue when he played with ID a couple of years ago, just not that good except in his own mind


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 20 2011, 11:03 PM


Only father would pick ness, folds under preasure!!!!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 20 2011, 11:41 PM


folds under anything..

on another note, WBH is only 2 points behind HC now. should be a tight finish.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 20 2011, 11:49 PM


GPR has PIERKOWSKI. What do you mean no one from GPR.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 21 2011, 12:27 AM


yes, pick no one from gpr


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 21 2011, 7:50 AM


who cares ness still sucks


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 21 2011, 7:55 AM


what he's not the best forward on GPR!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 21 2011, 8:48 AM


who is.... in your opinion?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 21 2011, 9:26 AM


no one on GPR


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 21 2011, 3:55 PM


Tough to argue with those All Star picks. what happened to the Islanders as they just collapsed


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 21 2011, 8:04 PM


too many egos


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 21 2011, 11:04 PM


score from tonight??


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 21 2011, 11:12 PM


Pick a forward from LF. Highest GF in the east


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 26 2011, 4:01 AM


Very true GPR has several very good forwards. Piorkowski isnt necessarily the best.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 27 2011, 11:43 AM


Piorkowski is most consistent on GPR, however quite a few skilled forwards not to far behind


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post December 30 2011, 11:11 AM


2nd all star East Team

Kicksee TA - G
Chow GPR - D
Choe HC - D
Rooke LF - F
Caluccio WBH - F
Huckle LF - D


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 1 2012, 3:25 PM


3rd East All-Star team:

**** yourself.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 3 2012, 6:10 PM


Nobody on gpr deserves to make list. They are all puck hogs and the coach can't coach or discipline. So expect this team to drop in the standings starting tonight when WBH kicks there asses!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 3 2012, 11:58 PM


GPR 4 WBH 2

Kick ***


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 4 2012, 10:51 AM


GPR top team in the East!!!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 4 2012, 10:08 PM


Will be after they kick around TA!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 5 2012, 8:54 AM


Yea I see!! Lost to the Mighty Aces,


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 5 2012, 9:56 AM


is that a mistake?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 5 2012, 10:49 AM


nope


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

anonymous
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 5 2012, 11:51 AM


the Aces beat the Flames also so don't feel so bad GPR. no team can take another for granted


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 5 2012, 2:39 PM


Aces beating Goulding is tough to imagine,particulary after Goulding beat WBH in previous game. I suspect any of the top four can win the east this year


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 5 2012, 3:54 PM


Goulding missing number of players, better team won on this night

Congrats to Aces


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 7 2012, 2:30 AM


gpr has several of their better players away on vacation. any team could lose to the aces when their best players are away and are only playing with 11 players


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 7 2012, 10:43 AM


the aces only 9 players. get a life ....lol


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 7 2012, 12:22 PM


again, congrats to aces team is still ****, and won't make playoffs and anyone can beat anyone on a given day, the better team won that night so maybe you get a life


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 7 2012, 1:06 PM


Take a vacation ....lo


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 7 2012, 9:13 PM


I'm sure every damn team in the g has players on vacation....gpr can stfu for once and accept they lost


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 8 2012, 11:59 AM


GPR will take first next week all team is back and will make run for first!!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 8 2012, 2:17 PM


Isn't every team making a run for first?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) WBH Game
No score for this post January 9 2012, 1:33 AM


WML 3

WBH 1

What happened? I was expecting WML to blow them out.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH Game
No score for this post January 9 2012, 8:34 AM


NT over the Mighty Flames?
What happened there.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH Game
No score for this post January 9 2012, 9:11 AM


WBH had a 1-0 lead until the third, then WML put three home. Even game.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH Game
No score for this post January 9 2012, 12:44 PM


GPR may of beat WBH but, they are going nowhere. I predict they won't make the playoffs. They have no team play and the coach sucks!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH Game
No score for this post January 9 2012, 12:56 PM


GPR coach is gone at the end of the season. Asst coach taking over team. It's about time! This guy is the reason the team can't win. He doesn't know anything about hockey. Next year the team might have a shot but, not this year.



Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH Game
No score for this post January 9 2012, 3:16 PM


GPR has made it to the division finals the last two years under this coach, is challenging LF for first in the east, and has the 5th best GFA of 19 teams in the GTA.

You're an idiot if you think the coach is getting turfed next year and even dumber if you think GPR won't make the playoffs.

Battle for final playoff spot in the east will be between NT and WBH.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH Game
No score for this post January 9 2012, 4:42 PM


You mean NT and Canadiens for the 4th and 5th spot.
GPR is still a top team in the East. Coach is fine, nothing wrong with him. I don't understand why you are bitter towards this coach. I guess your kid was cut by this coach and you come on here bashing him. You my friend, are an IDIOT!
Flames will finish 1st by a point or 2 with GPR 2nd. WBH should finish 3rd by 1 or 2 points ahead of the Canadiens and NT. NT has offense and Hillcrest has goaltending. Will be interesting to see which one of these 2 teams make it.



Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH Game
No score for this post January 9 2012, 5:04 PM


I think this last post has it right. Canadiens and NT fighting for 4th spot. WBH has good depth this year and GPR and Leaside's record speaks for itselve. Not sure why so much anti- GPR rants .... team playes well on the ice regardless of the off ice tension.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH Game
No score for this post January 9 2012, 5:33 PM


Wow somebody really wanted to be on GPR team, thankfully not good enough to make team, and we don't have to deal with this crazy, Coach is fine team is fine and does play competitive hockey in east and west just check the stats, who ever comes out of east in the end will give west run for their money, Currnetly theier are only two teams to worry about and that is VR and ST, noone else in west scares anyone in the east


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH Game
No score for this post January 10 2012, 2:10 PM


hillcrest has average goaltending


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH Game
No score for this post January 11 2012, 12:32 AM


below average goaltending


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH Game
No score for this post January 11 2012, 9:08 AM


hawks beat leaside 1-0 last night. Leaside looked very averagre
.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH Game
No score for this post January 11 2012, 9:44 AM


because they are average, out-coached again last night!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH Game
No score for this post January 11 2012, 1:16 PM


What happened to Islanders? Sure some injuries, but wasn't this "supposed" to be a playoff team?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH Game
No score for this post January 11 2012, 2:33 PM


islanders a mess ...coach should have benched the selfish players but chose not too. lots of one man bands


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH Game
No score for this post January 11 2012, 10:02 PM


islanders have lots of talent and picked up good players. No system being taught and team looks undisciplined


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH Game
No score for this post January 11 2012, 10:54 PM


They suck, and won't win another game this year players just not very good


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH Game
No score for this post January 12 2012, 2:14 PM


Islanders are done, team started with promise and then just collapsed. lesson learned fro all.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH Game
No score for this post January 12 2012, 2:47 PM


Glad to here playing them tonight


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH Game
No score for this post January 13 2012, 9:09 PM


Where did the great North Toronto team disappear to? The amazing players that they have (not) seem to have not done much and the coaches were to know it all! LOL!!! This team has kids and parents on it that bring down every team they go to, look at their history. Too funny!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH Game
No score for this post January 13 2012, 9:50 PM


Just like you....lol........


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH Game
No score for this post January 15 2012, 3:12 AM


You want funny? Unzip your pants and see the joke your parents played on you.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH Game
No score for this post January 16 2012, 12:33 PM


I agree. The NT team is going nowhere fast! A bunch of rich crybabies that are never happy. No matter what team they play on.
Looks good on the bunch of you when you don't make the playoffs.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH Game
No score for this post January 16 2012, 12:42 PM


I guess that makes YOU a Poor Crybaby..........All the same to me......Wa.....Wa.....Wa!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH Game
No score for this post January 17 2012, 9:08 PM


NT will make the playoffs. Hawks lost a big game to VP and NT on a roll right now


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH Game
No score for this post January 17 2012, 11:59 PM


Flames lost to the Aces. Does that mean that they will make the playoffs. What a Maroon!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH Game
No score for this post January 18 2012, 7:45 AM


You said it waskwy wabbit........Uhuhuhuhuhuhuhuh


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH Game
No score for this post January 18 2012, 9:02 AM


ok how about WB sucks and NT will make playoffs, WB played more games than anyone else


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) WBH
No score for this post January 18 2012, 9:03 AM


Willowdale came up with two short handed goals last night and an empty netter to beat the Terriers 3-1. The boys played well despite some penalty trouble. Exciting game to watch.

No way is NT making the playoffs.




Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 18 2012, 11:29 AM


WBH will get into the playoffs and NT will go home. WBH will beat GPR and then the coach of GPR will get let go (finally) and then maybe GPR will have a chance to win something next year.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 18 2012, 2:02 PM


WB still suck and could not beat lowly panthers, if I remember score was 4 - 0 WB has never one and never will losers


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 18 2012, 2:27 PM


Hurrr durrr let's take the score of 1 game and judge a team, look at me guys I have autism


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 18 2012, 2:59 PM


you're right they have never "one"


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 18 2012, 3:31 PM


How was the goaltending?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 18 2012, 4:04 PM


Very quiet first 2 periods, guy didn't see much action until the 3rd, held out for the win.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 19 2012, 11:36 AM


WBH very balanced this year, Goulding best , Leaside is sliding and Hillcrest best days maybe over


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 19 2012, 5:59 PM


Leaside all the way baby!!!!!!!!!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 19 2012, 9:15 PM


Islanders are making a run...for 6th


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 20 2012, 8:36 AM


hows does it work for play offs between the interlock. How is it decided who makes play offs?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 20 2012, 8:38 AM


big game for the East Leaside Vs GPR Predictions????


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 20 2012, 9:43 AM


leaside 4 gpr 1...


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 20 2012, 9:46 AM


Leaside easy win 6-2


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 20 2012, 9:58 AM


GPR will outcoach LF for big win!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 20 2012, 12:20 PM


How do you decide which teams make it to play offs with interlock


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 20 2012, 12:25 PM


Its based on standings within your division. Top 4 in the east, top 8 in the west.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 22 2012, 9:59 AM


HC best days over?? Sure looked good taking out WM! East just as good as west and playoffs will be close


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 22 2012, 11:06 AM


Are you sure the GTHL website is correct?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 23 2012, 8:19 AM


Hillcrest tough to figure out,,,, beat West mal and then lose to North Stars....... whats up with Hillcrest ???


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 23 2012, 8:36 AM


Surprised Leaside beat Goulding. This could be a preview of the East Finals.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 23 2012, 8:37 AM


Leaside all the wayyyyyyyy baby.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 23 2012, 10:48 AM


Leaside just the better team, not sure GPR can compete with the big boys


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 23 2012, 11:12 AM


Saturday night Leaside was the better team. But its not like they are walking away with the division title. Tight race among top 5.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 23 2012, 12:21 PM


4-3 looks like it was an entertaining and hard fought game to me!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 23 2012, 12:25 PM


Please was not close Leaside sent out message once and for all and proved to be the better team

End of story


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 23 2012, 12:42 PM


Ya, ok. Keep fooling yourself. LF just about gave up the lead. Pretty evenly matched game.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 23 2012, 1:40 PM


GPR cannot compete with the big boys. Leaside was playing with them. the game was never close. GPR sliding fast and will not make playoffs.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 23 2012, 2:04 PM


Hillcrest tough to figure out,,,, beat West mal and then lose to North Stars....... whats up with Hillcrest ???

Ran into a hot goalie. HC will be fine for playoffs, best goalies and sound Dmen


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 23 2012, 2:11 PM


GPR cannot compete with the big boys. Leaside was playing with them. the game was never close. GPR sliding fast and will not make playoffs.

Yeah right. GPR couldn't miss the playoffs if they tried. They're still the best overall team in the loop and should represent the east in the city finals.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 23 2012, 2:12 PM


GPR cannot compete with the big boys. Leaside was playing with them. the game was never close. GPR sliding fast and will not make playoffs.

Yeah right. GPR couldn't miss the playoffs if they tried. They're still the best overall team in the loop and should represent the east in the city finals.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 23 2012, 2:18 PM


Agreed. GPR best team in east and will take any team from west!!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 23 2012, 2:38 PM


let's not get carried away LOL. I said they should represent the east. I didn't say they'd take any team in the west. Thats a different story.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 23 2012, 5:08 PM


GTHL updated their results... Hillcrest lost to West mall 5-0....that makes more sense


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 23 2012, 6:32 PM


GPR will go down in the first round. Leaside and Willowdale final with flames winning the east.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 23 2012, 7:20 PM


Its time to face the facts guys, no matter who wins, ST or VR are just too strong in the west in a long series.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 23 2012, 10:55 PM


Anybody wanna know about to good MHL A players, they're buddies, that might go back to playing AA next year? Coaches would show interest, they want to play together.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 23 2012, 11:33 PM


HC will be in the east finals and wont lose to GPR or LF


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 24 2012, 6:26 AM


Which two?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 24 2012, 9:14 AM


HC doesn't have enough offense to make it through a long series in the playoffs. And WBH defense/goaltending won't keep them in it to the division championship.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 24 2012, 4:03 PM


One of them was a star player on a struggling team, where as the other one was a good player on a good team.. both want to go back to AA but I can't release names. Any coaches looking for players with not only skill, but players that want to be pushed harder then they are at the A level.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 24 2012, 4:05 PM


Are they willing to drive East?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 24 2012, 11:41 PM


Should be a good game tomorrow night. If WBH get goaltending then they should win


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 25 2012, 7:19 AM


Depending on the opportunity given, and the team they are playing for. That would be up to them and the coaches to discuss.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 25 2012, 8:14 AM


Why don't you exchange phone numbers and do your scouting directly? It feels like we're the third person in a room on a blind date.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 25 2012, 9:38 AM


To be fair to WBH, their goaltending has not been an issue for a while. To look at rare lopsided losses is unfair, because these can be found on every team and are more an indicator of bad team play rather than the tender's fault. Recent 1-0 win over leaside and 3-1 win over terriers are evidence of what seems like stability.



Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 25 2012, 9:38 AM


To be fair to WBH, their goaltending has not been an issue for a while. To look at rare lopsided losses is unfair, because these can be found on every team and are more an indicator of bad team play rather than the tender's fault. Recent 1-0 win over leaside and 3-1 win over terriers are evidence of what seems like stability.



Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 25 2012, 9:57 AM


lol maybe. defense has been sloppy though


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 25 2012, 5:08 PM


GPR also playing bad defence lately. Hawks will win if goalkeeping stays strong!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 25 2012, 5:54 PM


goulding has had their number. should be interesting.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 25 2012, 7:14 PM


decent team with opening spots for next season?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 26 2012, 12:00 AM


Is the website correct? Good game for Hawks if its true!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 26 2012, 7:26 AM


Website is correct. The Hawks fought hard to come back from being behind 2 goals early.
They skated hard the whole game and played well. Lots of chances for them.
GPR couldn't get any consistent rythm going.

Should be an exciting run up to the playoffs. Hawks will definitely be there.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 26 2012, 8:31 AM


Hawks played with good character, stayed out of the penalty box and full deserved the win last night, Goulding a very good club , top four will be an interesting finish as Hawksa re for real this year ... they have depth and good dressing room


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 26 2012, 8:41 AM


Hawks wanted it more last night and deserved the win. Good game guys. Look forward to seeing you in the finals.

GPR Parent.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 26 2012, 9:12 PM


From another GPR Parent yes Hawks outplayed us last night no issue better team won


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 27 2012, 8:24 AM


what happened to Chow on the Rangers?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 27 2012, 11:00 AM


last time we played him, he got in a fight with his teammates!!
Goulding may have good on ice chemistry but looks like its been a long year in the dressing room


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 27 2012, 11:23 AM


He's recovering from an injury. Should be back in the line-up soon.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 27 2012, 12:05 PM


Dressing room is out of control on GPR and Coach is out of control. He favours the same kids who aren't team players and he doesn't know how to win. This team will fold and will choke over the next few weeks. They could even miss the playoffs. Get rid of this guy! He sucks!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 27 2012, 1:30 PM


Can you please share whatever you're smoking?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 27 2012, 1:45 PM


This guy has been all over this site, in other forums as well trashing the GP coach. My son doesn't play there but we know some people on the team who seem quite happy to be there. Any time we've faced them they've never looked like a team that's "self-destructing". Sure, like any other teams they've had ups and downs but overall they're doing well. Aren't they challenging for top spot? I think that someone has a real hate on for this coach; maybe his kid got cut...maybe something else but I for one don't put much stock in it.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 27 2012, 1:53 PM


Currently on GPR team, might not be perfect as no team is, but definitely not self destructing. Obviously there are things that could be better, but not sure there is a team out there that does not have issues

GPR will be fine and should be there for the finals the competition is tough and if GPR does not make it will be because they got beat by a better team not because self destructing

Hope this puts to rest all the BS that is out there for sure being written by someone not on team who has no idea, and probably was not asked back for obvious reason


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 27 2012, 1:57 PM


Well said.

12:05 is the same idiot that comes on here spewing lies about the team every year. Kid got cut and he can't stand that the team does better and better each year without him. The coach is doing fine, so are the boys. Looking forward to getting Chow back after his injury.

Playoffs should be exciting. Top 4 teams are pretty evenly matched. NT is making a push for a playoff spot, but may come up just a bit short.

Good luck to all. (Including 12:05... with your therapy that is)


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 27 2012, 2:05 PM


Well said.

12:05 is the same idiot that comes on here spewing lies about the team every year. Kid got cut and he can't stand that the team does better and better each year without him. The coach is doing fine, so are the boys. Looking forward to getting Chow back after his injury.

Playoffs should be exciting. Top 4 teams are pretty evenly matched. NT is making a push for a playoff spot, but may come up just a bit short.

Good luck to all. (Including 12:05... with your therapy that is)




Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 29 2012, 12:15 AM


Maybe you should be in therapy. I know, the GPR team will go nowhere. Team is weak and disappear when game gets physical. Goalies and D are are weak and soft and will fold in next 3 weeks. That is what they deserve.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 29 2012, 8:16 PM


Whatever meds your taking is affecting your judgement. Please see your Dr.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 29 2012, 11:24 PM


rip north toronto play off hopes


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 30 2012, 8:00 AM


ANY TRUTH TO THE DISBANDING OF GPR NEXT YEAR

JOINING UP WITH THE BLUES?




Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 30 2012, 8:12 AM


GPR a good team, they keep winning and play a good team game. Any of top four can win on any given day. Islanders a disaster given reasonable talent level,very poor coaching. Aces never give up but no horses.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post January 30 2012, 9:29 AM


GPR already set for next year, think this year may not be done yet


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

anonymous
(Login bh17gh15) WBH
No score for this post February 1 2012, 10:05 PM


I agree the Islanders have some good talent. Too bad that they can't learn to play together. I agree, coaching has been an issue this year. Will be interesting to see what happens for next season.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post February 2 2012, 12:05 AM


Since only top 4 make playoffs it looks like NT will be on the outside looking in.
Any one of the top 4 capable of coming out of the east but GPR has good team play and LF have skill and lots of speed. WBH have good size and HC have good defence and best goalie but GPR and LF favored.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post February 2 2012, 9:57 AM


Where is everyone??? SHHHHHHHHHHH! all writing exams! Start bashing next week. Losers!!!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post February 2 2012, 6:13 PM


HC has no goaltending lol


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post February 2 2012, 9:10 PM


Nobady has goaltending in the east...lol


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post February 2 2012, 10:07 PM


nobady? You illiterate ****.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post February 3 2012, 1:51 PM


easy ness



Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post February 3 2012, 2:19 PM


Can Handel the truth hey.you literate .... Head.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post February 4 2012, 9:10 AM


Look at the facts, Jack!

For the month of Dec and Jan.
GPR and WBH 17 out of 26 points =.654
LF 13 out of 20 points =.650
HC 10 out of 20 points = .500
You can't say who will finish 1st or who the better team is, till the end of the season.
Read em and Weep!
And HC only 2 wins in Jan were against
MI and TA.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post February 4 2012, 9:33 AM


Chow is ripping apart his own team. Thinks his son should play 50%. Get a life Chow Chow!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post February 4 2012, 9:54 AM


shouldn't the best D play down the stretch?
If he's healthy, play him!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post February 4 2012, 10:21 AM


9:23 Pretty desperate don't you think. Spreading lies about Chow/GPR to try to create disruption where there isn't any. I guess when you're scared of a team or player (because yours just isn't that good) you have to resort to such tactics.




Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post February 4 2012, 5:04 PM


one truth about him is he's gotten in fights with his teammates..


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post February 4 2012, 5:54 PM


guess it depends on what you call a 'fight'.

disagreements? sure.
figts? no.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post February 4 2012, 7:01 PM


Scores?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post February 5 2012, 3:53 PM


gpr1 chow0



Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post February 5 2012, 5:00 PM


GPR keeps winning! Will have first locked up soon!!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post February 5 2012, 5:53 PM


nope, fight


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post February 5 2012, 5:54 PM


kids got passion, something lacking in AA


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post February 5 2012, 8:19 PM


biggest surprise, biggest upset so far?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post February 5 2012, 10:56 PM


biggest surprise is MI. lots of talented kids and much better team than results have shown.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post February 5 2012, 11:43 PM


i'd say thats more the case for NT than MI


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post February 5 2012, 11:54 PM


NT way to good not t make the playoffs


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post February 6 2012, 8:06 AM


MI a disaster,coach lost the bench earlier in the year.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post February 6 2012, 8:55 AM


NT can no longer catch GPR or LF. With only six games left, most they can get is 38 pts. Unlikely they'll get through the Terriers, VR or GPR without at least one loss. Meaning NT is likely to end up with 34-36 pts.

Hillcrest plays Aces twice, so they'll likely end up with 37-39 pts at a minumum. WBH would have to loose all of their remaining games. That's unlikely as they will probably get a point or two at least from the Royals or MI.

So it may be too little too late for NT. Too bad, cause they're not a bad team.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post February 6 2012, 9:10 AM


Flames Vs Terriers tonight?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post February 6 2012, 9:13 AM


NT is a very good team however bad coaching, how else do you explain losing to panther 3-0


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post February 6 2012, 10:19 AM


NT loss could be any number of things... players injurred, absent, suspended or simply not performing.

Funny how parents see it. When teams win its because of the players, when they loose its because of the coach. Truth is...its a team game. Win or loose, everyone plays a part.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post February 6 2012, 12:47 PM


Just like the coach to not take any blame, trust me all about the coach


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post February 6 2012, 2:45 PM



Guess you missed the part above "its a team game. Win or loose, everyone plays a part."

Team, Everyone = Coach + Players

Sounds more like shared accountability than skirting blame. But you only here what you want to hear, see what you want to see.



Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post February 6 2012, 3:11 PM


Sure but coach is who should be leading the kids, and the one individual who can derail team bu bad descisions, we should have won easily both games on weekend, nothing less




Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post February 6 2012, 6:47 PM


All coaches are poor in the east. NT is better than all the teams and should be in playoffs. Reason, bad coaching, period!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post February 6 2012, 6:50 PM


GPR coach is history after the season. New coach coming in. It's about time! He is terribal!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post February 6 2012, 7:33 PM


Lol NT is ****


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post February 6 2012, 8:23 PM


6:50.... I laugh at you. You funny.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post February 6 2012, 9:51 PM


get real! NT sucks this year, don't sugar coat it


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post February 6 2012, 10:19 PM


You are right don't sugar coat NT coach sucks real reason for bad season team has the talent but missing the leadership


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post February 7 2012, 9:00 AM


Full marks to WBH coach - treats his players with dignity and class. I ahve not seen that anywhere else.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post February 7 2012, 9:56 AM


Guess you don't get around much.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post February 7 2012, 10:22 AM


Would say same for most coaches


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post February 7 2012, 10:26 AM


fair comment.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post February 7 2012, 11:22 PM


GPR coach is the best in the east. Just look at his track record! His teams compete and succeed every season.
Players enjoy playing for him.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post February 8 2012, 9:26 AM


Yup, first year on team, and definitely a good coach and even a better person GPR coach gives it all he has to team


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: WBH
No score for this post February 8 2012, 10:13 AM


flames loss to terriers could make things interesting


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) East playoffs
No score for this post February 8 2012, 10:51 AM


Right now things are so close in the East that anything can happen with the top 4.

NT have too far to climb and won't make it.

Likely ending will see GPR and Leaside finishing 1/2 (I give the edge to GPR - they have an easier finish)

WBH and HC will fight for 3/4 - final game of the season between them could be the deciding factor. I give the edge to WBH and think the final standings will be:

1. GPR
2. Leaside
3. WBH
4. HC
5. NT
6. MI
7. Aces

Thoughts anyone...


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: East playoffs
No score for this post February 8 2012, 1:11 PM


Right on, top 4 team too close to call, and any slip by any of the 4 teams, and things could change quickly, I would think HC will have the harder time as currently seem to be going the wrong way, however will not miss playoffs. Once playoffs start any of the 4 team could move on, all depends on who is hottest at that time. Right now the two hottest teams are GPR and WBH


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: East playoffs
No score for this post February 10 2012, 8:07 AM


Tough to argue with this fellows prediction. Wonder if the aces and islanders fold after this season.

1. GPR
2. Leaside
3. WBH
4. HC
5. NT
6. MI
7. Aces




Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: EAST 95AA Teams for 2011/2012 Season-new thread
No score for this post February 8 2012, 1:47 PM


HOTT NEW RUMOUR - Former Bruin Coaches Coming Back Next Year. For the Midget Year


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: EAST 95AA Teams for 2011/2012 Season-new thread
No score for this post February 9 2012, 9:30 AM


who cares


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Big Weekend
No score for this post February 11 2012, 3:04 PM


Lots of good match-ups today that could affect the standings.

Leaside vs Hillcrest - HC coming off tie against VR. Both teams need the win.
Hawks vs Huskies - Hawks playing better as of late while Huskies are inconsistent
Goulding vs Sharks - Both teams playing well but slight nod to GPR

Good luck to all.




Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 11 2012, 9:20 PM


Looks like a battle to the finish for 1st/2nd between LF and GPR.
Battle for 3rd/4th between HC and WBH.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 12 2012, 10:30 AM


Top 4 teams in the east playing great hockey lately. Anything can happen in the last 4 games of the season and will set up for great playoffs no matter what the matchups. Same for top 4 in the west. Kids are showing that AA hockey is at a very good level!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 12 2012, 1:16 PM


Last head-to-head games could be huge.
LF - GPR Feb 18
HC - WBH Feb 25


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 13 2012, 2:50 PM


GPR Coach
My son plays in the west and has a friend on GPR and in his first year with team, says he's best coach ever played for.
My son wants to try out for this team next season. His teams always do well and has good rep around the league.



Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 13 2012, 3:04 PM


WooHoo! I got post #600!!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 13 2012, 4:21 PM


GPR Coach
My son plays in the west and has a friend on GPR.
It's his first year with the team, and he says it's the worst coach he's ever played for.
We will certainly be staying away from that team next season.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 13 2012, 4:21 PM


GPR Coach
My son plays in the west and has a friend on GPR.
It's his first year with the team, and he says it's the worst coach he's ever played for.
We will certainly be staying away from that team next season.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 13 2012, 8:04 PM


Sounds like some sour grapes to me.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 13 2012, 8:08 PM


LF have best team in east and will beat any west team in final. They are going to get it done when it counts.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 13 2012, 8:11 PM


WBH will beat all comers. LF soft, GPR has weak D and Goalies, HC can't score enough.
WBH will be east champs! Great job coach S.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 13 2012, 8:23 PM


Agree tha WBH coach has done good job with this group but, don't think they'll win division.
LF and HS top 2 in east. GPR going out first round.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 13 2012, 9:09 PM


keep talking behind the screen. LOSER


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 14 2012, 8:00 AM


Toronto Aces will be back next year. Just wait and see. Coach will run all summer to get the team ready. We are happy to be on his team.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 14 2012, 8:05 AM


Not sure why people slam Goulding - each year they are competitive and go deep into the playoffs. We always have a tough game against them. Top Four in East all very competitive. Comes down to goaltending on any given night. who of the top four has the best goaltending ?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 14 2012, 8:12 AM


Not hillcrest.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 14 2012, 8:38 AM


Ness does!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 14 2012, 9:38 AM


No stand out goaltenders in the east. Just depends which one is hot on any given night.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 14 2012, 9:52 AM


I agree with above poster, there is no stand-out goalie in the east. I think the playoff games will be high scoring.
It's up for grabs this year with no obvious favorite.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 14 2012, 9:59 AM


Ness is the best in the East.Wtf is wrong with you people???


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 14 2012, 9:59 AM


Ness is the best in the East.Wtf is wrong with you people???


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 14 2012, 11:19 AM


WBH has never been champs, and not about to start now with no defence and even worse goaltending HC should win the east, as great defence, and best goalie in the east


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 14 2012, 12:17 PM


Ness best in the east....LMFAO...wtf are you watching?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 14 2012, 1:10 PM


HC has best goals against average. Weak in goals for. LF has good offence and defence is strong. Not enough to beat GPR


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 14 2012, 1:39 PM


LMFAO!!GPR sucks!
No coaching on this team and the goalies and defense are the worst in the division.
Their out first round.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 14 2012, 2:46 PM


See what happens this weekend.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 14 2012, 2:51 PM


Same guy bashing WBH and pimping ness, everyone's goaltending seems about equal on average. We will see come playoffs.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 14 2012, 3:40 PM


1:39 GPR has the 3rd lowest GAA and 5th best GFA of both east & west teams, suggests their defence, goal tending and offense are pretty balanced.

Coach has lead the team to division finals two years in a row and they'll probably be there again this year. Sounds like coaching isn't a problem either.

I guess that just leaves you... delusional and holding onto a grudge.




Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 15 2012, 8:17 AM


no issue with GPR coaching ... they win consistently. Next topic please. Do the Aces and Islanders fold next year?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 15 2012, 8:24 AM


why would Aces and Islanders fold?????


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 16 2012, 8:07 AM


losing seasons , tought to recruit when you have a poor season


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 16 2012, 9:14 AM


With a few upgrades on players (say 6-7), the Aces could have a competitive team.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 16 2012, 9:17 AM


Isles have good core of players, good skill and size. Need some coaching to make it all work!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 16 2012, 9:55 AM


the good players will go to better teams.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 16 2012, 10:53 AM


9:55 if you take your core MI and Aces and add players that really want to work and improve your will be fine next year however that comes down to the coach and his abilities and the players that he chooses to follow his direction. You cant have 1 without the other.....it will not work!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 16 2012, 11:07 AM


Recruiting may be an issue in the midget year. Good teams and coaches will have an advantage.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 16 2012, 11:15 AM


There will be teams in the west folding next season. The hockey should be better.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 16 2012, 6:42 PM


If you watch the top 4 teams in the east and west the hockey is very good. Playoff rounds will be very good hockey on all fronts.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 17 2012, 12:43 AM


agreed, who do you predict will meet in the finals


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 17 2012, 8:59 AM


If you are a player on Aces or Islanders - do you want to stay? If you are a player looking for a move - are these the teams you start with? The bottom teams are going to remain bottom teams simply because most of the existing players won't want to stay, and recruiting will be very difficult. I doubt both teams will fold, but one likely will.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 17 2012, 9:51 AM


leaside has awesome goalies


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 17 2012, 11:21 AM


They sure do. The best in the East!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 17 2012, 12:04 PM


LOL you're joking, right?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 18 2012, 3:59 PM


Leaside Flames will crush GPR tonight and show everybody who the best team in the east is!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 18 2012, 10:21 PM


As predicted, Leaside came through and crushed GPR 7-6 and showed everyone who the best team in the east is!
They will finish first and sweep in the playoffs!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 18 2012, 10:30 PM


Crushed???!! Terrible game on both sides that proved nothing. If that is the best in the east west will kill them.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 19 2012, 12:07 AM


How is a one goal victory considered "crushing" the other team?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 19 2012, 1:12 AM


You must be kidding, LF with no goaltending, and even worse defense will be lucky to get past the first round,


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 19 2012, 11:14 PM


NT the best team that will not make playoffs. Much better team than WBH but they have run out of time after that costly slide. Anyone's game for the playoffs, but after the weekend that LF had they will have slight edge.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 20 2012, 9:27 AM


How come WBH beat them three games out of 4, then?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 20 2012, 9:57 AM


Good point. I wouldn't say NT is a much better team than WBH. More like equals at the end of the season. Both teams improved during the year. Unfortunately, NT struggled early in the season for a longer period and it cost them a playoff spot.

Looks like playoff positions are just about set. LF vs WB, GPR vs HC in semi-finals.

WBH could surprise and do well against LF. But LF is still favoured to win the series.
GPR should be able to take HC.
Setting up LF vs GPR in finals. That one could go either way.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 20 2012, 10:37 AM


Agreed. WBH got much better as season went on, same as NT. Clock ran out on NT. Playoffs are up for grabs, especially in short series. Still like GPR to come out.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 20 2012, 11:21 AM


Series are best of 7.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 20 2012, 1:24 PM


If HC finishes 4th and plays the Flames and GPR vs Hawks then I would say Hawks will beat the Rangers while the Canadienws have the Flames number this year. It all depends on the final standings. WBH vs Hillcrest in the finals. If Hawks finish 4th and play the Flames then yes it will be Flames vs Rangers in the finals. Good Luck to all.



Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) By the stats....
No score for this post February 20 2012, 4:42 PM


That stats don't really support your argument.

GPR beat WBH in 3 out of 4 games and outscored them 17-8.
GPR beat HC in 3 out of 4 games and outscored them 15-6.
LF went 2-1-1 against both HC and WBH. LF outscored HC 16-12 and WBH 15-7.

Doesn't sound like HC or WBH had either of LF's or GPR's numbers this year. The most interesting match-up was LF vs GPR - where LF went 3-1-0 but scoring was 16-15 in LF's favour. Two games were decided by 1 goal. So it would seem LF and GP are the two most evenly matched amongst the top 4.

But to your point, WBH has the greatest shot at creating an upset because they have been playing well since Jan 1. Using the MyHockey rankings (excluding tournaments), the teams avg ratings are:

WBH 10.83
GPR 10.29
LF 10.10
HC 9.52

But these exlude this weekend's games. Taking them into account would pull up GP, LF, HC and pull down WBH. All of which is to say that the playing field gets levelled even more.

Regardless of the match-ups, the playoffs should prove to be very exciting.
Good luck to all.



Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: By the stats....
No score for this post February 20 2012, 9:03 PM


There are 3 seasons during the year. 1st half 2nd half and playoffs. Always been that way every year. We don't care what happened the 1st half.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 20 2012, 10:14 PM


NT sucks, don't really deserve to be in playoffs WBH one of top four teams as they should be Anyone of 4 teams can win it in the east and that includes WBH, and not NT, who are from equal


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 21 2012, 12:55 AM


NT wouldn't even be close if it weren,t for home ice advantage where the refs don't allow any visiting team to win at north toronto. They dont deserve to make playoffs. They are crybabies!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 21 2012, 1:12 PM


GPR will be first team eliminated and LF will win the east, as expected.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 21 2012, 2:52 PM


LF in for a suprise if they think they can beat WBH, best in east second half


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 21 2012, 3:37 PM


I'm sure LF are shaking in fear of the mighty Hawks.... lol


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 21 2012, 4:16 PM


Hawks and Flames playoff games have a history as they always seem to play each other in the first round


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 21 2012, 4:41 PM


Flames will beat anyone in the East. Bring it on!!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 21 2012, 4:43 PM


Flames are only worried about HC. With Ness in the nets it will be very difficult to beat them.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 21 2012, 4:47 PM


4:43 enough with the pimping, its gotta be a parent.....stop putting your kid's name on here you are only asking for the rude comments....and if he was so hot he would have the team in first....!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 21 2012, 6:52 PM


yep, Ness is garbage.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 21 2012, 7:15 PM


how could any one say willowdale has been the best since christmas...or even the second half....(includes tournaments but not gouldings xmas tourney)

Willowdale 6-7 (Will prob end 8-8)
Leaside 9-3-3 (Will prob end 10-3-3)
Goulding 7-4 (Will prob end 8-4)
Hillcrest 4-4-2 (Will prob end 5-5-2)

Its hard to argue willowdale have been the best since xmas...but its funny to read i guess


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 21 2012, 8:08 PM


Excluding tournaments since jan 1.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 21 2012, 11:29 PM


HC has no team in front of Ness. That's why we are not in 1st, dummy!!!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 21 2012, 11:37 PM


HC will come out on top of East GPR better hope not to play HC, getting hot at right time


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 21 2012, 11:55 PM


I think the HC goalie pimping Dad is a bipolar.

First he says HC has no team in front of his superstar netminder. Then he says HC will come out on top.

How is that Dad? Is superstar goalie going to save all the goals and score them all too?

Actually, now that I read back a few posts I figured it out. Most goalies are happy to be playing in net. But your superstar has figures out how to be in "nets" - presumably both of them, at the same time.

Interesting trick. You rock HC goalie...and Dad.




Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 22 2012, 12:45 AM


GPR will steamroll HC! It wonèt be close, GPR will win by at least 3 every game. Too much firepower on this team. HC canèt score.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 22 2012, 11:24 AM


GPR cannot steamroll HC. Too much defence and best goalie in east. Will be good series but HC will win!!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 22 2012, 11:26 AM


HC much better and consistent team then GPR. Sorry, regular season is meaningless. Playoffs is what counts and HC will prevail!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Big Weekend
No score for this post February 22 2012, 12:25 PM


HC worst goalie in east


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) HC
No score for this post February 22 2012, 12:56 PM


If HC are so much better than GPR than how do you explain their record against WBH?
The Hawks have won 2, HC 1 and a tie that HC were lucky to get when a dying seconds shot got passed a completely screen WBH goalie.

Neither this team nor their goalie have impressed me.



Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 22 2012, 1:23 PM


Agreed, GPR has displayed more power, so to speak.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 22 2012, 2:06 PM


Goalie saw shot all the way Hawk Dad GPR are for real this year, not! Canadians nothing but goalie so Flames will rule the East again.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 23 2012, 10:00 AM


Where is Chachi on NT going to play next year. GREAT year hey Chach!!!! LMAO How does it feel not making the playoffs?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 23 2012, 11:04 AM


HC will rule, top goalie and defence will prevail, heard it here first, look foreward to destroying GPR


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 23 2012, 11:25 AM


Keep telling yourself that HC goalie dad if it makes your feel better. But the stats suggest you're deluding yourself.

Goals For Per Game - GPR 3.9 vs HC 2.7
Goals Against Per Game - GPT 2.1 vs HC 2.3

On both accounts, HC is the weaker team. Sure HC might win a game over a series, but how is it you think you'll "destroy" GPR?

Btw, I love how you like to use that word when you beat a team by 1 goal. Does that mean when your team loses by 1 goal or more that they - and their hot-stuff goalie - got "annihilated"?

LOL. Too funny.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 23 2012, 11:51 AM


Who said HC is playing GPR? HC will play the Flames and GPR will play the Hawks!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 23 2012, 12:14 PM


I hear NT will fold cause Chachi is going to the Aces next year.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 23 2012, 12:40 PM


Then HC will beat LF, really no difference both teams suck


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 23 2012, 1:08 PM


GPR will not lose to HC. Get that through your thick skull and accept the fact that they are the better team.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 23 2012, 5:31 PM


Sorry pal, HC wants to finish 4th cause they seem to have a better time vs the Flames. Just having a hard time vs the Rangers. We will leave that series up to the Hawks, who seem to have found a way to beat the Rangers now. Both will be great series but HC will beat the Flames and will play the winner of GPR vs WBH.
Good luck to all 4 teams. A great regular season finish.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 23 2012, 8:40 PM


Watch out for the Hawks now. 10-5 score last night is awesome!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 24 2012, 12:48 AM


WBH are the team to beat in the East. Theyre smokin hot!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 24 2012, 8:48 AM


Who did the Hawks beat and how many goals did they let in again,lucky for you guys won't be playing LF first round Not much chance anyone will beat us, and definietly not a bunch of goons called WBH


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 24 2012, 10:03 AM


OR GEEKS called LF


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 24 2012, 10:37 AM


Yah but Geeks beat goons, so who cares LF is best team in East and will play best in West end of story


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 24 2012, 1:24 PM


Yah but geeks are always high!!!!!!!LOL


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 24 2012, 1:32 PM


Can any team truly think hey can beat ST this year....? Only way to be beat is if they are imploding. Get them going and watch the blaming begin.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 24 2012, 1:40 PM


In a long series ST is untouchable. Only team that has a chance is VR
West champion is city champ!!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 24 2012, 1:48 PM


According to you... why bother having the playoffs at all? We should just crown ST city champs now.

It's ego's like yours that invite everyone to hate ST.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 24 2012, 2:02 PM


Does not matter if geeks are high still have more smarts than goons, so lucky for you guys probably won't see us until second round, at which point geeks should win the East


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 25 2012, 9:16 AM


Goodbye North Toronto, Markham Islanders and the Toronto Aces. It was a pleasure playing you guys. Have fun at the GOLF course.
Are you guys playing in the Clancy with the Jets and Icedogs. They are looking for some teams to play against!!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 25 2012, 10:27 AM


What a jerk you are!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 25 2012, 10:27 AM


previous poster is a moron. his kid is obviously bound for the SHOW. When he's cut at the end of the year and forced to go to a less talented team, other morons will be saying the same thing about him. good luck to the kids playing on the non-playoff teams.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 25 2012, 10:28 AM


some interesting matchups today to end the season. the one to watch will be HC and Willowdale. I wonder if HC will play soft to get Leaside in the first round.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 25 2012, 11:14 AM


lAST 2 GAMES AGAINST EACH OYHER WITH TOP 4 TEAMS

LF VS WBH 1L 1W
LF VS GPR 2W
LF VS HC 1W 1T
TOTAL 9/12 POINTS

HC VS WBH 1T ?
HC VS LF 1L 1T
HC VS GPR 2L
2/10 POINTS

GPR VS WBH 1L 1W
GPR VS HC 2W
GPR VS LF 2L
8/12 POINTS

WBH VS GPR 1W 1L
WBH VS LF 1T 1W
WBH VS HC 1T
6/10 POINTS


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 25 2012, 12:17 PM


Wrong, LF vs WBH was 1L 1T which makes it 8/12 for LF .


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 25 2012, 12:19 PM


So what your saying is the best match ups would be GPR vs WBH and HC vs LF?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 25 2012, 1:13 PM


Lets see the 2nd half of the season, 17 out of the 36 regular season games. Not including tonights games.

LF 20/34 points
WBH 23/34 points
GPR 20/34 points
HC 14/34 points

OK so who's the best team 2nd half????
WBH Avg .676
GPR Avg .588
LF Avg .588
HC Avg .412
In order for HC to come out they must rely on Ness to win(weak d and no offense)
WBH must stay out of the penalty box to win(need skilled players on ice not in box)
GPR has to change their system "d shoot the puck out"(easy to counter attack and no D-men)
LF have to get more physical.(too soft for playoff style hockey)



Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 25 2012, 1:58 PM


Ness' dad is getting clever. Nice try, but relying on Ness to win means they would be swept.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 25 2012, 4:18 PM


Wow Leaside only beat the Aces 1-0 this afternoon.

Was there a forfeit or something?
Anyone know what happened??


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 25 2012, 9:13 PM


Leaside won on a forfeit.

Scores on the other games?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 25 2012, 9:56 PM


HC got thier perfered matchup


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 25 2012, 10:29 PM


GPR got completely outplayed and fluked out the win. They re going out first round. They stink!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 25 2012, 10:29 PM


HC will sweep LF you heard it here first, LF D and goalie will let them down


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 25 2012, 10:30 PM


What a disgrace Keon and the Aces not showing up. GPR should have a rematch against the Flames for 1st place. We heard Aces wanted LF to win 1st place and not the Rangers. This is bad for hockey!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 26 2012, 8:00 AM


WBH played weak teams in the second half.

I watched that team a few weeks ago lost 4-0 at chesswood.

All I can say is S@@T team S@@T coach and S@@T goalie.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 26 2012, 8:35 AM


perv!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 26 2012, 9:17 AM


Disappointing that Aces mailed it in like that. Flames would have won anyways but bad message there. Playoffs will be exciting and all four teams have excellent chance.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 26 2012, 9:18 AM


Dunno, they've beaten goulding, and shut out leaside and hillcrest in the second half. Looks half decent to me.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 26 2012, 9:53 AM


Aces are a disgrace team and players should be ashamed, they for sure would have lost to LF, but not even showing up is a shame thank god my kid never considered playing there, and obviously never would, a shame for the keon name also. Good luck to the teams that are in the playoffs may the best team win


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 26 2012, 2:17 PM


Aces orgnization should be fined, no excuses for this.

Relative to Mr Ness, WBH put pucks behind him with relative ease. Perhaps an off day but very underwhelming performance.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 26 2012, 2:21 PM


Best was the 3rd goal last night. I think Ness was whining to the refs about something instead of paying attention to the play that was still inside the Hillcrest zone.
WBH player must have thought Christmas came really early in 2012.

Just a STUNNING display of goalie focus and attention....LOL



Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 26 2012, 8:16 PM


I think the Aces messed around with the Integrity of the League by forfeiting the game. It's not right that the div champs win by default.
WBH will win it all anyway. It doesn't really matter.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 26 2012, 10:44 PM


WBH will be lucky to win one game in this series.

GPR has this one in the bag!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 27 2012, 4:15 AM


Sounds like GPR parents on here trying to stirr the pot again.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 27 2012, 8:43 AM


9.16 Defaulted Games.

(a) If a Team defaults a game, a fine of $200 shall be levied, payable within 30 days to the League Office. Teams failing to pay fines within a reasonable time period may be removed from further competition and/or subject to whatever sanction is deemed necessary by the Board. Teams guilty of defaulting a game more than once in a season shall be reported to the President for further disciplinary action.
(b) The score for a defaulted game shall be 1-0 for the non-offending Team.
(c) The Team Officials of any Team deliberately defaulting a game for any reason shall be indefinitely suspended until the case is reviewed by the President.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 27 2012, 11:36 AM


Rule is clear enough. But kinda sucks when it impacts the division championship.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 27 2012, 2:40 PM


GPR/WBH series will go the distance and both teams will be tired and bruised by the end of it. Leaside should take Hillcrest who seemingly have lost the desire to compete


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 27 2012, 4:40 PM



No score for this post November 12 2011, 5:21 PM


With most teams now having passed the one third mark of the season, let's see how things look in what is shaping up to be a fascinating campaign for the Midget Jr. AA East loop. Before I begin, here's a few general observations:

a) Normally, I restrict my observations to teams currently sitting in a playoff position but with the East Division down to seven teams, this becomes a real challenge. Under GTHL rules, only four teams will see post-season action and when one looks at the top five teams, there is no runaway favourite and nor is there any longshot also-ran. As of today, any one of these five teams has a chance to finish first, or be the odd-man-out come playoff time.

b) I must agree with an earlier poster who pointed out that consistency has been an elusive quality for the eastern teams thus far. That said, it's a bigger problem for some teams than for others.

c) Speaking of consistency, the biggest frustration for players, parents and coaches has been the frequency and unpredictability of the penalty calls; particularly those for head contact. I fully agree that head-hunting has no place in the game and stronger enforcement is warranted. However, in their zeal to crack down on offenders, the GTHL may have let the pendulum swing too far the other way. The new rules are not being consistently applied; possibly because the officials themselves are having difficulty adjusting. This has led to a sharp upturn in penalties (many marginal at best) that have killed the flow and momentum of the games and resulted in everyone becoming frustrated.

Now that I've got that off my chest, here's a team-by-team review of the East as at November 12th. Remember that this is the opinion of one humble observer after seeing each team play at least once. I`d be interested in hearing the comments/critiques of other posters.

1) Hillcrest Canadiens: A team on a roll. Boosted by stellar netminding and a stingy defence, HCC are the only team in the east that gives up fewer than two goals a game. Not the most talented team but they make up for it by hard work and gutsy determination. Scoring was a challenge early on but they seem to have solved that problem; outscoring their opponents 14-4 in their last four games. The missing ingredient could be toughness and physical play which could cost them down the stretch. If it's true that defensive play wins during the playoffs, then HCC could be a force to be reckoned with.

Strength: goaltending: probably the top two tenders in the loop.
Weakness: Lack of physical play that allows attacking teams to take liberties

2) Leaside Flames: Lots of speed up front and an unmatched killer instinct once they have the lead. If you give them room to skate they can hurt you as evidenced by their gaudy offensive stats (scoring 4½ goals a game). After a roaring start which saw them winning five of their first six, they seem to be plagued by the inconsistency bug of late going 3-2-2 in their last 7 which includes lopsided losses to the Braves and Aces (!).

Strength: Explosive offence that can blow any game wide open.
Weakness: Goaltending can be suspect at times.

3) North Toronto: A team that’s shown itself to be a true competitor while facing some daunting challenges. Despite several serious injuries and the "retirement" of a key offensive contributor, the depleted NT squad have gone 6-2 since October 9th. They have a very quick and effective transition that can create opportunities and may be responsible for their respectable offensive numbers. Some challenges on the back end where "soft" play results in too many scoring chances.

Strengths: A gutsy, determined work ethic combined with some admirable speed and skill
Weakness: Occasional lack of aggressiveness; particularly in the defensive zone.

4) Willowdale Blackhawks: Probably the least talented of the top five teams, WBH have achieved some success by playing an aggressive, in-your-face style of hockey that has at times confounded some of the "higher-ups" (witness wins against Hillcrest and NT , a tie against Leaside). That said, if the Hawks want to avoid being the 5th man in a 4 man race, they need to get better on their own side of the puck. Disorganized play in the defensive zone and some shaky netminding has led to the second worst GAA in the east.

Strength: Size and aggressiveness; particularly on special teams
Weakness: Defensive play in general; from the goalie on out needs to improve.

5) Goulding Park Rangers: I’m going to go out on a limb and predict that this is will be the sleeper team of the loop. A squad that is far better than its numbers indicate, GPR may not have the most talent but are easily the best balanced. Crafty forwards who know how to score, a disciplined defensive core and solid netminding; it all adds up to a team that can take it all if they can just get it all together. And this brings me to their biggest issue: INCONSISTENCY. After some pre-season tournament success, they stumbled out of the gate, then went on a 6 game rampage, outscoring their opponents 31-7 (!!!) including an eye-popping upset against the western powerhouse Huskies. Since then they're 0-2 and have been outscored 6-1. Puzzling to say the least.

Strength: A balanced lineup that can beat you any number of ways.
Weakness: The poster boy for inconsistency.

At the risk of opening myself up for ridicule, here's a quick review & prediction for upcoming matches this week:

Saturday, Goulding Park Rangers vs Toronto Aces: It won't be a 9-0 romp like the last time, but even with the rust following a long layoff, GPR should be able to put the brakes on their mini-slide and take care of business. Rangers by 3 goals.

Saturday, Leaside Flames vs Toronto Royals: I'm going to predict a high scoring affair here with the Flames coming out on top. 5-4 for Leaside.

Sunday, North Toronto vs Humberview Huskies. A gallant effort by NT will come up short. Dogs by 2 goals.

GAME OF THE WEEK: Tuesday, Leaside Flames vs Goulding Park Rangers: This one should be well worth the six dollar admission and again I'll go out on a limb and predict a low scoring win by the Rangers say, 3-2.

Wednesday, Goulding Park Rangers vs Willowdale Blackhawks: Busy week for the Rangers and I'll predict a successful one too. GPR by 2 or 3 goals.

Friday, North Toronto vs Willowdale Blackhawks: Again, I'm not sure why but I'm going to predict a very close game; possibly a tie or a 1 goal win for NT.

Saturday, Toronto Aces vs Mississauga Jets: The two last place teams of each division go head to head. I'm calling for the Aces to pick up their second win of the season with a 2-1 triumph over the hapless Jets.

Saturday, Markham Islanders vs Hillcrest Canadiens: HCC will be rusty after not playing for almost 2 weeks. They’ll win, but it might be closer than you think. Canadiens 2 Islanders 1.

To all the kids on all the teams, I say thank you for some great hockey so far. We're all looking forward to what's to come and good luck the rest of the way.



Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message





You were so very wrong!!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 27 2012, 4:57 PM


The general descriptions of each team still sound pretty accurate to me.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 28 2012, 1:55 AM


GPR lucky to win tonight. Next game will be different.



Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 28 2012, 6:20 AM


did you see the game?

did you see the movie gone in 60 seconds

the new one is gone in 23 seconds.

dont forget 4 bars.




Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 28 2012, 7:41 AM


GPR had a solid win what the hell were you watching...


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 28 2012, 8:07 AM


GPR came out flying - Hawks stood still for firts period.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 28 2012, 8:31 AM


GPR scores on first shift. 3-0 after 1 period. Hawks were never a threat in this one.

Game one is in the books. Hawks will regroup. GPR needs to be prepared every game.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 29 2012, 10:23 AM


Hawks will kick GPR 's butts all around the rink this weekend!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 29 2012, 11:05 AM


GPR will kick Chow's *** this weekend.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 29 2012, 11:06 AM


Rangers are the best in the East. No one will touch us now moron.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 29 2012, 12:00 PM


GPR Fan - Lets not get ahead of ourselves. One good game does not make us division champs. We've got at least three more to go against WBH - who aren't likely to roll over a play dead so we'd better come prepared to play each and every game. Then we'll face a good competitor in Leaside (no disrespect intended HC - just think LF will take your series) for the championship. If that match-up unfolds, it should be an exciting series.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 29 2012, 12:01 PM


Goulding is very strong but Hawks are now awake, I do not anticipate a short series. I suspect the hillcrest/leaside series will be positively gentle compared to this one.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 29 2012, 3:58 PM


Goulding is very strong eh!!! Go ask your videoman CHOW. WBH had possesion of puck 70-75% of the game. What game are you watching for real! Your goalie saved your lives.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 29 2012, 4:41 PM


You're right, WBH had 75% of the puck possession. Unfortunately that was when it was in your net behind your goalie.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 29 2012, 4:54 PM


As a WBH parent, I can safely say that WBH had minority puck possession, and did not test the goulding goalie at all.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 29 2012, 5:19 PM


as another WBH parent I agree. Full marks to Goulding for game one.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 29 2012, 7:07 PM


GPR Parent, yes Goulding was the better team on this night one game however is just that one game, pretty sure series is far from over and could go either way


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 29 2012, 9:05 PM


same guy wrote the last 3 post's. Nice try.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 29 2012, 11:54 PM


how on earth would you know if it was the same person?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post February 29 2012, 11:54 PM


how on earth would you know if it was the same person?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 1 2012, 8:33 AM


google it


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 1 2012, 8:41 AM


google what?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 1 2012, 10:35 AM


Yes the guy is an idiot trying to sound smart, first I did one of the posts, and second, even if you had an IP address there is no assurances that same person, as IP address posted is for your provider

Let's be clear teams are different, however both have thier strenghts and weaknesses and either can win at this point, pretty sure neitehr team has a clear road to LF just yet, one game at a time


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 3 2012, 12:13 AM


LF had big game against HC tonight but HC missing key players. Game 2 will be much different.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 3 2012, 8:33 AM


Ness played for the Flames last night.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 3 2012, 8:56 AM


Sounds like the "greatest goalie in the east" had an off night.... eh Mr. N?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 3 2012, 9:40 AM


other goalie played... ness wasn't on the bench. they didn't have a backup. is ness hurt ?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 3 2012, 10:02 AM


This kid is so stupid that he just doesn't get the hint, you STINKS! Learn how to stop the puck and stop waving at the parents watching, you Jack@ss!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 3 2012, 10:17 AM


That's very observant Einstein. Maybe once when you finally pass Grade 3 English you can share more of your keen insights. In the meantime does anyone know what happened to Ness? Why wasn't he there last night?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 3 2012, 10:24 AM


Scared sh!tless. He knows the the finger pointing will be at him. Oh, but it was the D's fault, or the forwards didn't score enough or come back fast enough. Get over it, you STINKS!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 3 2012, 10:46 AM


Dont be stupid. He did not play last night and team was short. Wait till next game will be a different story!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 3 2012, 4:47 PM


^ no it wont


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 3 2012, 6:54 PM


LF will sweep in 3!



Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 3 2012, 10:59 PM


No sweeps in the east for either series. HC and WBH will both win game 2


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 4 2012, 1:32 AM


lol!!
It will be WBH and LF in the final. That's just the way it is going to be. Sorry GPR and HC.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 4 2012, 1:39 AM


Agree. WBH are really the team to beat and they will knock GPR on there asses tonight and each game after that. GPR cannot handle the physical game and the goaltending of WBH.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 4 2012, 3:32 PM


GPR lucky to win first game. Tonight WBH will show them who the better team really is . GPR wimps go home!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 4 2012, 4:39 PM


Luck had nothing to do with it, be honest with yourself.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 4 2012, 4:56 PM


GPR will go up 2 - 0 tonight. WBH cant keep up with speed and better D on GPR


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 4 2012, 10:26 PM


score from tonight?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 4 2012, 11:32 PM


5-0 GPR over WBH.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 5 2012, 12:11 AM


GPR was lucky that the refs favored them tonight otherwise, they would have lost. They are not that good. It's only 2 games and the Hawks have time to prepare and win the next four games. Watch and see, Hawks will bounce back.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 5 2012, 12:20 AM


Yawn! Positive thinking is good but, I don't think that will happen in this series........


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 5 2012, 12:23 AM


If WBH would focus on hockey, they would do better than all the headshots
We can beat GPR, just need some discpline coach get a handle on players and lets finish what we started


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 5 2012, 12:37 AM


4 hc penalties to GPR and 3 to WBH. You dont make sense GPR Dad.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 5 2012, 7:34 AM


12:23 Started? When did WBH start?

9 goals against and 1 goal for in two games - sounds more like you have yet to show up.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 5 2012, 7:58 AM


7:34 5:0 for GPR sounds like your team was out to lunch. 1 goal in two games.....


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 5 2012, 9:38 AM


how do you sweep in three in an 8 pt series?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 5 2012, 10:40 AM


7:58 What are you talking about?

GPR has dominated the first two games.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 5 2012, 1:21 PM


hawks need to a) score first goal b) have less penalties than goulding c) a hot goalie to change the direction of this series


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 5 2012, 4:24 PM


They'd need goddamn superman in net to turn this around if WBH keeps playing like they are.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 5 2012, 5:34 PM


Oh, you mean like getting Ness from HC? Someone on here said he was the best goalie in the east.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 5 2012, 7:22 PM


I thought WBH was going to run over the GPR wimps? This game just proved that GPR is only physical when they have to be, and when they have too, they'll knock you on your ***.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 7 2012, 9:52 AM


GPR Coach will not be behind bench next game. Wonder what's up?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 7 2012, 10:50 AM


Parents petitioned club to remove him from team, GM will be coaching team moving forward.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 7 2012, 11:04 AM


give us all a break. whats with you and the GPR coach, you have issues talk to him face to face he won't hide unlike you.....


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 7 2012, 11:23 AM


I agree - I am a WBH parent and from where I watch the games, he does a great job.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 7 2012, 11:23 AM


Never seen so much BS in my life unfortunately for you coach will be behind bench working hard to beat a good opponent, the series is far from over and yes Martelli will be there win or lose


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 8 2012, 1:04 AM


Coach M will be gone, youl see! Where is the coaching staff who knows he wont be there on the weekend
Why cannot you people see, GM will take over and WBH will win game. Parents and some players asked club to take him away. Too much problem with this coach. Team will loose.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 8 2012, 7:19 AM


Buddy... everyone knows you're full of ****. Why do you keep trying the same old crap about the coach being let go? Is Willowdale that desperate that they have to resort to this?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 8 2012, 7:55 AM


I hear that the assisstant coach runs the practice for the Rangers.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 8 2012, 8:00 AM


Hey 7:19 Why would you think that WBH. This guy has been on here for 3 years and always saying the same thing. He or she must of been on your team(Rangers) before and got CUT so now for 3 years he or she has been on here.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 8 2012, 8:18 AM


8:00 am you are so right, he or she has been on here for yours


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 8 2012, 8:22 AM


dont blame WBH for the silly posts on Goulding coach- there is nothing but grudging respect for Goulding from the WBH parents.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 8 2012, 8:23 AM


dont blame WBH for the silly posts on Goulding coach- there is nothing but grudging respect for Goulding from the WBH parents.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 8 2012, 9:19 AM


I am sure not WBH parent, spewing all this crap, for sure more todo with some parent whose kid got cut a while back, and parent just cann't let go. Next game will be interesting of course and could go either way, series far from over


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 9 2012, 9:21 PM


Coach m!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 9 2012, 9:46 PM


All of this bs about GPR coach is just that, bs! One of the few consistencies around this teams success over the last four years is Coach M. As players have come and gone, he still has been there with his commitment to teach the boys how to succeed. By my books, he's done a great job! Furthermore, his sidekick, GM, has also been a big part of the team's success. Those are the facts, the rest is just ********!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 10 2012, 11:15 AM


GPR will finish up with WBH today and then win the east!!!!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 10 2012, 1:23 PM


series is 4 games at least...


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 10 2012, 2:47 PM


Actually its "3" go to GTHL website playoff format is listed


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 10 2012, 4:37 PM


Flames 6 - Hillcrest 2


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 10 2012, 4:40 PM


GTHL website has Jr Midget Semi-Finals at 8 pt series


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 10 2012, 4:53 PM


GPR will win today at home


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 10 2012, 8:34 PM


WBH destroyed GPR congrats boys


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 10 2012, 10:02 PM


Website says GPR 1 WBH 1

is this a mistake?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 10 2012, 10:16 PM


Nope WBH outplayed/outhit/Outshot, if not for refs in GPR back pocket game was WBH to win pretty sure tide has turned WBH should now be on a roll


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 10 2012, 10:23 PM


Don't forget that goaltending was a big part in this game. Both goalies got a lot of shots and played well.



Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 10 2012, 11:13 PM


Good game WBH. I wouldn't say you "destroyed" GPR. But you played hard and definitely deserved the point tonight.

Don't agree with the comment about the refs favouring one team over another. Seems they had their whistle in their pockets on a lot of stuff tonight.




Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 11 2012, 9:04 AM


website says LF 4-2 over HC
Is this a mistake!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 11 2012, 9:20 AM


Don't know what you're looking at. Site says LF 6-2 over HC.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 11 2012, 10:08 AM


Full marks to WBH on the tie. Defending a 5 pn three in last 2 minutes was very rough. Otherwise hawks were full credit for the effort and likely deserved 2 points


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 11 2012, 10:27 AM


Sounds like the LF-HC game where LF pulled off the tie in the last few minutes of the game. Good teams have a way of doing that.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 11 2012, 2:30 PM


Hawks have the cannons to come back in this.
You can do it if you believe.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 11 2012, 2:35 PM


Hawks will win the next one! No problem!!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 11 2012, 3:42 PM


WBH on come back trail, predict Monday will be a win, WBH about to breakout with scoring


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 11 2012, 6:43 PM


Both goalies got a lot of shots? Nice try, but WBH played well enough to keep Goulding's shots to around 10.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 11 2012, 8:07 PM


Are people still picking on the WBH goaltending? I think that they have been pretty solid for a while including playoffs.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 11 2012, 10:24 PM


Hawks look great. will win monday!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 11 2012, 10:51 PM


Should be a breeze if they play discpline game


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 11 2012, 11:38 PM


People are you serious? Short memmories? First game 4-1 for GPR, second game 5-0 for GPR. That doesn't say "great WBH goaltending" to me. I'll give it to you that in game three your goal tending played well. But don'tget ahead of yourselves.

Plus, over 3 games you've scored 2 goals. Do you really think offense like that is going to win you a lot of games?

Looking forward to a good game tomorrow night, but don't start planning your strategies against LF just yet.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 12 2012, 7:27 AM


Gene is back on this site bashing the Ranger Coach. OMG get out of here. Between you and Chow


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 12 2012, 10:29 AM


Dont count HC out of this yet. Boys still have lots of fight left and will win Wednesday!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 12 2012, 12:38 PM


Flood gates will open tonight, WBH will force GPR defence to cough up pucks, and goaltending will be thier undoing


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 12 2012, 12:46 PM


Goaltending has not been the problem this series for WBH. Suspect defensive play has. Not defensemen, team defensive play. A lack of offense in addition to that. WBH has no hope of winning if they continue to score goals at their current pace.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 12 2012, 1:44 PM


WBH needs goaltending and blocked shots like they received last game. Goulding goaltending has been strong. Suggest another low scoring game tonite.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 12 2012, 4:51 PM


I agree WBH golatending has been good, and non issue, defence has been suspect though, and will need to improve if WBH hopes to win, series far from over


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 12 2012, 5:03 PM


WBH will win tonight and shift the momentum in tere favor. That dumb GPR Coach is the reason the team will loose. He doesn't belong in hockey. He was told to not show up to game on weekend and then argued with everyone to force his way on bench. See the result??



Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 12 2012, 5:08 PM


No Defense?? 1-0 and you say no defense. You make me laugh. Rangers were lucky to have a 2 man advantage the last 2 minutes to tie it up. It was a great game and Ranger goalie stood on his head. Could be the best goalie in the East after Ness.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 12 2012, 5:33 PM


LOL! WBH are the better team. They will show it again tonite and will come back and win 1 game at a time. GPR, your done!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 12 2012, 11:29 PM


hey ness fan he sucks just like you. the 1-1 had great goaltending the third belonged to the WBH goalie. Ness have a good summer


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 12 2012, 11:44 PM


Wow, what happened GPR, did not even show up, let's see how does that song go

na, na, na, naa, na, na, na, naa, na, na, na, na , na

Bye Bye GPR see you next year


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 13 2012, 12:05 AM


GPR is done! They will lose the series now as the coach cost them the game tonight. He sucks! When will GPR learn to get rid of him! He is a cancer! Ruins kids thats why they lose!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 13 2012, 6:58 AM


Did you watch the first 2 games how could you say goaltending was not a problem. Some of the goals were suspect, and if they come at the wrong time.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 13 2012, 8:43 AM


Systems. They say a system is put in place to cover a teams weakness!
Come on Martelli, cant you see that Willowdale has figured out your system. Let the D play their game instead of yelling all game to shoot the puck out. Our D looked sloppy and confused. Teach our D how to play real Hockey. Your going to blow this series. My son hasn't learned anything as a D on this team But just to shoot the puck out. Wake up!!!!
You can't keep your forwards high all game they must get back and help our D!!!
Your are using Vaughan Rangers style and look what happened to them.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 13 2012, 10:02 AM


Lol! Blame the coach Mr. Hockey Expert.



Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 13 2012, 10:05 AM


Lets give credit to WBH, the deserved the win


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 13 2012, 10:13 AM


Sounds like the Hero blaming the coach should take up his concerns directly instead of complaining on the blog. Coward.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 13 2012, 11:33 AM


Coach M will right the ship as he always does.
Suspensions from last night will hurt.
Hawks riding their hot goalie and looked good last night.
Series far from over


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 13 2012, 11:56 AM


GPR just needs tie to clinch! Get the job done!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 13 2012, 12:10 PM


HAH he playes 2 good games where the team doesnt collapse and suddenly we have a new ness. your just as bad


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 13 2012, 12:31 PM


average*


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 13 2012, 1:58 PM


WBH are a better team than GPR. Those are the facts! Rangers can't handle the aggressive forechecking because D are slow and not very smart. GPR will be eliminated by The Hawks!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 13 2012, 2:08 PM


Wow. One win, one tie and suddenly WBH is golden? Guess you forgot about the first two stink-bomb games you played this series. I'll concede that WBH has gained momentum, but hard to say they are superior.





Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 13 2012, 2:23 PM


Once they changed goalies they became untouchable just look at the results!!!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 13 2012, 3:09 PM


Just like series was not over after two games, still to be decided, GPR has taken a step back, but will right the ship WBH not good enough to win series, face the facts. Until you get to 6 points you have nothing.

The coach bashing is for sure coming from an WBH parent, who has no life, GPR all good on home front, nice try losers




Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 13 2012, 5:30 PM


8:43
Bang on the $.
GPR treats their dmen like second class citizens right going back as far as Minor Bantham when nhe took over.
WBH has better talent and their coach has lit them up at the perfect time.
GPR is going in reverse.
No more magic for green park goof.
Go Hawks.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 13 2012, 5:37 PM


Hey Gene....we've missed you.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 13 2012, 6:14 PM


Is Goulding that desperate that they have to resort to this?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 13 2012, 6:33 PM


Trust me these are ex Ranger parents on here stirring crap again. It's the same messages as last year when Rangers played Bruins. Check out last years posts and see for yourself. All the same sayings.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 13 2012, 7:16 PM


Don't you just love it when sore losers come on here and spew their venom. They can't take winning......that's why they're losers!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 13 2012, 7:53 PM


Its disappointing that a few clowns (mostly parents I believe, not players or coaches) come on here making false or inflamatory statements and people attribute it to an entire team.



Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 13 2012, 8:57 PM


So sad for these ex GPR parents, that still cann't get over that GPR no longer wanted them, read your post and you will know why, who would want you losers,

I am guessing, you are currently sitting out of playoffs


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 14 2012, 8:54 AM


As a a WBH parent,I have nothing but respect for Goulding team , am tired of seeing stupid comments about their coaching. trust me, it is not the WBH parents posting this crap. WBH parents are the best I have seen in our GTHL experience.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 14 2012, 9:54 AM


The feeling is mutual, no issue with WBH, has turned into a good series


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: HC
No score for this post March 14 2012, 12:13 PM


It's sad that people have to make a bad comment about a very good coach. He has done a great job with this team over the last 4 years. There have been lots of changes every year and the teams always do well. How many other teams have been as consistent and successful?
If you don't have something good to say, don't make stuff up! Leave Coach M and his team alone. They'll be fine and if WBH wins the series it's because they outplayed GPR and deserve to win.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 14 2012, 12:30 PM


Thank you Network 54 bloggers for the positive and rational comments. Very refreshing and much appreciated.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 14 2012, 1:50 PM


I agree 2 good teams and who ever comes out will give Leaside a hard time too.
Thanks GPR and WBH for some good old fashion hockey. You are both talked about cause other teams fear playing either one of you. Good Luck to both teams tonight.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 14 2012, 3:51 PM


Leaside and HC still have not finished! HC will win tonight and push this to the limit!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 14 2012, 5:39 PM


HC is done who are you kidding


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 14 2012, 10:09 PM


Hillcrest 4 Leaside 1


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 14 2012, 11:13 PM


GPR won tonight, however good series, could just as easily gone to WBH, Unfortunately when game was done WBH player decided to crosscheck from behind one of the GPR players, and things got out of hand, first player should be suspended for next year if he decides to come back, secondly refs should have better control of game at end, this all could have been avoided if ref had half a brain,

Congrats to both teams, very tough series



Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 14 2012, 11:30 PM


GPR the better team and will win the east easily now!!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 14 2012, 11:36 PM


I am from GPR let's not get ahead of oursleves, lucky to beat WBH teams in east are all pretty close, and nothing is for sure


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 15 2012, 7:31 AM


WBH gave it all last night, proud of the lads, both teams play a hard game with equal amounts of hits , legal and otherwise.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 15 2012, 9:22 AM


Yes both teams played hard, definitely could have gone eitherway, fun to watch


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 15 2012, 7:40 PM


Hawks & Rangers game last night was awesome hockey.
Rangers kept at it and fought back every time.
Much as I hate to admit it, Hawks got out coached, again.
What amazed me was how ineffective the double team was on Hawks #14.
Still ripped in 3 goals+.
Atta boy Eric!
See ya in AAA.




Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 15 2012, 7:42 PM


Are you kidding there was no double team, what do you think, this is wrestling, give us all a break, and nothing wrong with WBH coaching, he did a great job with limited talent, if anything he has gained my respect


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 15 2012, 8:44 PM


GPR coaching error?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 15 2012, 8:57 PM


Number #14 please you do realize would not make any of the top teams, only looke good because WBH has limited talent


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 16 2012, 8:11 AM


#14 WBH can play wherever he wants,a good kid and great player


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 16 2012, 8:22 AM


Good player that will be sitting for a long time. Shame.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 16 2012, 8:58 AM


Rangers coaching staff did a fine job 1st 2 games and Hawks out coached them the next 3 games. Just ask the parents of GPR!!. GPR only won cause Hawks goalie stunk out the joint with very little shots against him. Marsden stay off this site?
GPR Parent


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 16 2012, 9:05 AM


Just like the hit from behind for your Chow and your captain both on the same Hawk player. Noticed he didn't play. I wonder why. Chow should of been a 3 gamer and your parents agreed that it was a bad hit.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 16 2012, 9:19 AM


Sure hits were marginal at best but rules are rules however still does not excuse the chicken *** attemtpt to hurt someon intentionally after games was over what world do you belong in to try to justify what that kids was attemtping todo, pretty sure you would feel different if your kids was hit from behing with every intention to hurt someone and game was over you need your eyes and heart checked. I am guessing you think that that hit was hockey, what a loser.

And its too bad that we are talking about hit, instead of good hockey both teams played, and I believe series could have gone either way congrats to both teams for hard fought series


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 16 2012, 9:45 AM


I wouldn't say either coach "out coached" the other. Both did great jobs. WBH coach got his guys to adapt after losing the first two games. GP coach got his guys to step it up and fight hard in the final game.

Level of play from both teams was intense and pretty even in the final game. Could have gone either way.

I agree with the previous poster, the suspensions (deserved or questionable) shouldn't overshadow the efforts of the players or the coaches.




Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 16 2012, 10:44 AM


Don't put words in my mouth.
We are not saying that fighting and hit from behind are acceptable. We are just saying that this was a hard fought battle between two tough teams. Stuff like this has been around since the start of sports. Yes its wrong but NHL allows it just like any other sport does and not much we can do about it till they fix it up. Hockey Canada has done a great job so far and will continue to improove.
The bad was seeing 4 Ranger parents surrounding the ref after the game and threatening them.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 16 2012, 11:56 AM


Those were coaches you idiot


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 16 2012, 12:16 PM


Rangers parents had no right going after the referee after last game....and yes there were parents involved. Very low class.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 16 2012, 12:35 PM


what does IDIOT have to do with this issue?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 16 2012, 12:37 PM


Lovino behind the penalty box yelling threats at the Ref with some other short fat Idiot!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 16 2012, 12:46 PM


hey 8:57 -
if #14 has limited talent, and he scored a hatty against you - what does that say about YOUR team?
The kid was the best player on the ice and is gone to AAA (minus the one-game suspension he got).


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 16 2012, 1:16 PM


agree re # 14 ...he dominated and easily a AAA quality or better player. Whats even better he is a leader in the dressing room and very well regarded by his teamates and coaching staff.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 16 2012, 2:25 PM


One game? Try nine.

Regardless, from what I've seen of him over the years I'd say what happened was uncharacteristic of this player. Good kid, good player. Just a momentary lapse of judgement & restraint.

If he makes AAA, good for him.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 16 2012, 6:36 PM


GPR Coach sucks! hes lucky the refs like him or he was loose the game and then the series. He doesnt now anything about hockey. Stay home, loser!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 16 2012, 7:18 PM


Somebody pee in your cornflakes?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 16 2012, 10:09 PM


Ref was guilty of being in WBH back pocket, how else do you explain, all the penalties being assessed, to one team and not the other, and also, just because one kids scores three goals, does not make him a star, again learn something about hockey, if such a great AAA player he would have been there instead of playing on a less than talented, team that deserved alot of credit for working hard, and playing as a team. I mean not to hard for a player to sit on other teams blueline, and wait for the puck, while rest of team is trying to defend with one man short,

In reference to ref he was a disgrace in letting game get out of hand, and for WBH parents for thinking that hitting after game was over, and trying to stir things up is hockey, its not, if you wanted to fight, why not do during game, instead of waiting until, someone had thier back turned, cann't believe anyone could think that is hockey.

Time to move on, as both teams played hard, and one would be disapointed after series was over, too bad one lousy hit at end of game, is all that is discussed


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 17 2012, 12:20 AM


learn, how to, use commas, properly.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 17 2012, 9:49 AM


That's Hockey.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 18 2012, 10:54 AM


Congrats to GPR for winning the series! Lets see who wins in the other series tomorrow night.
I say Leaside takes it.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 18 2012, 3:19 PM


GPR trainer has been seen at multiple west playoff games including last night wearing his entire GPR tracksuit
ahahahah what a joke


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 18 2012, 5:26 PM


So, trainer, or any other representative on any team watches a game why would that be such an issue He should be congratulated for putting in the time to scout other teams, or maybe has a friend on other teams I mean who cares. Enjoy, I am guessing you were at game to looking for a team for next year


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 18 2012, 7:07 PM


Lots of coaches out at games. Could be there for plenty of reasons. Enjoying good hockey, know people/players on other teams, maybe strategizing if they play against eachother at somepoint, maybe looking to move or yes maybe scouting. All of these are perfecly legit. Why are you trying to suggest its inappropriate of GPR trainer or any other coach?



Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 18 2012, 8:12 PM


Agreed totaly, what is the issue, other than some idiot trying to make an issue about nothing


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 18 2012, 9:48 PM


3:19 Actually, I wore my team hat, jacket and a pair of jeans. Crazy, I know.

FYI - I know players and parents on both the Tigers and Westmall, and frankly just enjoy watching these teams play because I have a lot of respect for both of them. I think its going to be an exciting series and will probably come to watch more games if I can.

Btw, I plan to watch the Leaside/Hillcrest game tomorrow night too. I look forward to your report on my attire. I'll be sure to wear something special just for you.

GPR Trainer


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 18 2012, 10:05 PM


Get a new thread! This one has gone on far to long!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 18 2012, 10:08 PM


Yeah talk about the playoff or something. Start one about the playoffs or something. Or something else. Just something. Get the picture!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 18 2012, 10:42 PM


Lets go Hillcrest!!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 18 2012, 10:55 PM


9:48 I would not worry about, 3:19 just an idiot with too much time on thier hands, LF/HC been a good series, and next one will be just as good,


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 19 2012, 6:23 PM


Sounds like 3:19 and the more recent chap are upset that the GPR Trainer didn't approach them about their kid. I wonder why?


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 21 2012, 7:47 AM


5-0 Flames?
What happened to the best goalie in the East


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 21 2012, 8:19 AM


"Best" goalie in the east didn't play. Out with illness.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 21 2012, 8:33 AM


he didn't play at all in the series. too bad for Hillcrest.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 21 2012, 9:21 AM


Thats why the series went to 5 games! Sam played a great series and could not be faulted for the loss. Much of why the team went the distance was his goaltending and defence. You obviously missed a great series!


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 21 2012, 2:48 PM


LF clearly the better team in game 5. HC was not in the game at all.


Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Anonymous Coward
(no login) Re: Mutual respect is a great thing
No score for this post March 22 2012, 1:39 PM


Haha i just wrote on the other thread that Botham played great throughout the series. Even in the higher scoring games for Leaside he still played very well. He brought them to game 6 IMO



Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. Respond to this message

Current Topic - EAST 95AA Teams for 2011/2012 Season-new thread

<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >> Return to Forum




Find more forums on Junior Hockey Create your own forum at Network54

Copyright © 1999-2012 Network54. All rights reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Statement
PLEASE POST COMPLAINTS IN MODERATOR ROOM ONLY