Return to Index  

Ken, any particular reason?

August 23 2007 at 9:48 PM
  (Login Agiyo)
YFOT


Response to They come both ways. The SN on the barrel is the better

I've heard that S/N on the barrel is better before, but if there's any qualitative difference between my CFX's, both apparently '04s, the .177 with the S/N behind the loading port is better. Its S/n is laser-etched, and the rotating loading block is smooth, bright chrome. Its scope rail is welded on above the power plant.

The .22 S/N is roll-engraved on the barrel, the loading block is not well finished at all, and might be a little more difficult to load without rolling the pellet. Might not. The scope mount has a one-piece rail clamped into normal dovetail slots, with 2-piece mounts on the rail (the way it was set up with the throw-away Gamo 4X scope that completes the Pyramyd package). And, the .22 has the "1200fps PBA, 1000fps lead" laser etch on the power tube. Obviously, that was meant for a .177.

I wouldn't part with either of them, but really, I'd have to give the quality nod to the power-tube laser-etched .177.

YMWCV,

Joe C

Going slowly, where others have the sense not to go

 
 Respond to this message   

Click The Banner To Visit sites.

D I S C L A I M E R
JK's Airgun Forums, moderators, and administrators are not responsible for any problems that may occur from reading or using content posted on this forum, as they are the exclusive responsibility of two parties: the person who posted it and the person who acted on said posted information.Use of our forums by people under 18 years old is allowed only with legal guardian(s) present.