|
Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINovember 7 2007 at 12:51 PM No score for this post | Anonymous (no login) |
| Let's start new. |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
| Author | Reply |
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 7 2007, 12:55 PM |
After looking at the rankings, the greener that said "who has Goldmember played, just Green", look again. Who has the stronger strength of schedule? Cleetus, higher the number, means more difficult. |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 7 2007, 12:56 PM |
The "Tim Hickman" should sort this out even further. |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 7 2007, 3:50 PM |
The Hickman should clear up a lot of doubt as to who is stronger |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 7 2007, 5:58 PM |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 7 2007, 6:29 PM |
there is a lot of people that care.maybe you don't care but ask any one of these kids and you will find out who cares |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 7 2007, 6:37 PM |
If you don't care, then go to the next thread. |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 7 2007, 6:44 PM |
Hey 5:58,
Why are you reading this thread. Are you an ice cream truck driver? |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 7 2007, 7:25 PM |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 7 2007, 7:34 PM |
I think some of the insecure parents care about the rankings more than the kids and so they put too much stock on these rankings thinking that their kid will be the next Crosby! |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 7 2007, 7:41 PM |
rankings, you shouldn't even be on them? |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 7 2007, 7:42 PM |
Cleetus what do you have to say about all this? Do the rankings matter? |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 8 2007, 9:26 AM |
Cleetus says
At this point the rankings don't matter. See ya in February baby. Keep going RZ cement your legacy, so far it is VERY impressive. |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 8 2007, 9:36 AM |
In the end green will rule.This whole team is improving at a faster pace then all the other teams Great Coaching RZ |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 8 2007, 10:07 AM |
Keep drinking that kool aid.
David Koresh |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 8 2007, 10:12 AM |
Ho Ho, A little trouble in the hen house is there ????? |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 8 2007, 12:34 PM |
Just let kids play and have fun. |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 8 2007, 3:53 PM |
Stop being so positive, that doesn't belong on this thread. Cleetus lives! |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 8 2007, 4:07 PM |
dis be for da gramar queen how many people did you P--- off today .musk be afful loney with out frens. cleetus |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 8 2007, 4:18 PM |
when you get 3 95 teams from one area ranked in Ontario you must be doing pretty good. It's all in the coaching. |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 8 2007, 4:31 PM |
Cleetus,
Glad to hear from you. I have enough friends thank you. What about you? How are things with your wife...err second cousin. Say hello to your son Jebidiah. Is he still playing the banjo.
|
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 8 2007, 7:01 PM |
.......there's a pole cat in the hen house.......like my momma used to say.......you don't know what's in the pickle barrel til ya git the lid off nit...... |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 9 2007, 4:18 PM |
Maybe we should hire coaches the ones we have are over paid |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 10 2007, 8:54 AM |
In my opinion ,coaching, the most thankless job on this earth .RZ's MOM |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 10 2007, 2:50 PM |
Dis be fir da grammer queen.ya tink fiftycent b a koin |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 10 2007, 7:15 PM |
green 11 hamilton 0 --- gold 3 kitchener 2 nice work teams |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 10 2007, 7:16 PM |
would have been nicer if the green kids were cheering for Gold and not the rangers. Poor display. |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 11 2007, 8:13 AM |
The Green kids are like their parents no class .That why they humilated the bulldogs.In a game like that is it not a god place to give your weaker players more ice time |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 11 2007, 8:24 AM |
The gold team played the most exciting game of the season hanging on by their finger nails.better to put yor best five out for the last minute .Other wise the previous 59 minutes are wasted. |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 11 2007, 9:02 AM |
7:16 The Green boys were just copying the actions of the Gold players at Medway a few weeks earlier. The golds were watching Green Waterloo game after they finished beating the Hamilton team & were cheering for the Waterloo squad. If our boys were cheering for Kitchener it is because the are in second trying to catch the Gold team. Do not comment on 12 year old boys & say poor display. If you do, look at your own kids first.
8:13 Your a jackass! What an idiotic statement. First the Green did not play the bulldogs they played the Hamilton Reps. Yes the boys won 11-0 & when the score was 7-0 the defense played up & the forwards played on defence. We beat the Reps 11-0 the same score you beat them by just a couple of weeks earlier. Your the one exhibiting the lack of class 8:13.
|
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 11 2007, 9:48 AM |
Map out the parade route, Green is on fire. Next they get Woodstock the they could be near the top. But OH OH then they play Stratford and Cambridge. Two games of hold your breath and pray. |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 11 2007, 10:51 AM |
It must be nice to be right all the time.If the shoe fits wear it.and stop calling people names all the time |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 11 2007, 11:11 AM |
8:24
Five best in the last minute? |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 11 2007, 11:15 AM |
There is a nice little rivarly between Green and Gold. Let it be for what it is. Most of these boys hang together off the ice, the Green boys cheering for Kitchener is nothing more than being in a competitive sport. Again, some parents make mountains out of molehills.
Everyone, relax and enjoy the boys hockey while you can! |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 11 2007, 11:25 AM |
Hey 95 Knights AA....The rest of the organization thinks you guys are hilarious......have you ever tried valium? |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 11 2007, 11:29 AM |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 11 2007, 11:49 AM |
This is the problem when you have two teams competing against one another in the same League. Some of these boys hang with one another on the opposing team and I find it hard to believe they wouldn't be cheering their friends on whether they are on the opposing team or not. |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 11 2007, 11:51 AM |
As for the comment on putting the "Best 5 on in the last minute"? That was obvious in the Game vs. Kitchener that the Gold team doesn't put out key players in critical game situations. They were in my opinion lucky to come out with the win. The coaching bench really needs to give their heads a shake if they want to remain on top. |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 11 2007, 11:54 AM |
All of the London AA teams have opposing kids riding the same bus. The 95s have three or four threads going. |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 11 2007, 11:58 AM |
This is our perverse way of entertaining ourselves. There is more than one thread because the original threads are too long.
Long live Cleetus |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 11 2007, 12:01 PM |
11:51,
The season is still young. Goldmember is about team unity and developing his players on and off the ice. If Goldmember can win the game by rolling, more power to him. Not to mention, the top notch officiating they had to overcome. |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 11 2007, 12:45 PM |
The officiating is something else.a couple of weeks ago they turned a 1.5 hr game into more then 2 hrs.and still didn't get it right. |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 11 2007, 7:14 PM |
gold 8 hamilton 1 well done team |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 11 2007, 7:48 PM |
London AAA 95 wins the Shanahan tournament. |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 11 2007, 8:40 PM |
Congratulations to the 95s!! Well deserved and a long time coming. |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 11 2007, 10:31 PM |
Way to go 95s. Much improved this year. You'll start to win in bunches now!! |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 11 2007, 10:40 PM |
top notch goalies will give you titles. Way to go. The two best goalies in the Alliance loop. AAA forever. |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 11 2007, 11:27 PM |
Not to take anything away from the 95 AAA team but they were playing a AA team (the best Tier II team in the States) in the final. BTW Gold and Green, that team, Kensington Valley, lost to the Rochester Rattlers that will be in the Hickman. |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Jim Heskin (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 12 2007, 12:27 AM |
You were right the first time, not to take anything away from this team that played 7 awesome games of hockey, includeing 3 on Sunday to hoist the trophy. The best out of 25 teams. Anybody who tries to put a negative spin on this is a bitter sour grape sucking loser. Furthermore, if you want to dis 12 year old kids on this site or in the back corner of a rink you are a pathetic coward. I would like you to step up and critisise my kid or any other player on this team to my face or any other parents face.... I did't think so, coward.Outstanding hockey this weekend boys you all were a pleasure to watch. Well done Coaches by far the best coaching staff I have ever had the privilage to be a witness to.
Sincerley
Jim Heskin
If my grammer or spelling is not perfect Too f***ing bad. |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 12 2007, 6:30 AM |
A little too much anger, Jimbo. |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 12 2007, 6:45 AM |
Hey Jim,
Your making Cleetus proud. |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 12 2007, 6:46 AM |
Sorry to hear about Drew Downer. For those of us who knew Drew, he will be missed. |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 12 2007, 8:21 AM |
Congrats to the AAA team sorry to hear about Drew, kids will be upset.
|
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 12 2007, 9:53 AM |
Hey One-goalie Jim
Looks like EB must have been back in the crease for the weekend...
You are my hero... you must have been on the site all along and then had a few beers and decided to put your name on it...sober up if that's possible in East London...
|
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 12 2007, 11:08 AM |
Maybe One goalie Jim should stay out of the Wacky tobackie |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 12 2007, 11:36 AM |
You started this Jim,, what did you think would happen??? Now what ? |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 12 2007, 11:56 AM |
you will always have a friend in me One Goalie Jimbo Cleetus |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 12 2007, 12:37 PM |
One Goalie Jimbo is a great coach too... just ask the back-up goalie from last season - you know - the one he forgot to carry...
real classy Jimbo - we might start our own thread dedicated to you and your drunken rants...
you will always be the hero of the 95AAA parents - were you elected as their rep or just brought it upon yourself ???
PS - DR won't be coaching the 95's next year - so you can lay off the praise... |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 12 2007, 2:01 PM |
Jimbo,
You could have played net last year, then you and mini me could have talked strategy before every game |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 12 2007, 2:16 PM |
Jimbo,
You are a hero to be brave enough to put your name on this... so here I go. ( gulp, gulp gulp, gulp gulp - five beers later )
okay my name is
John Doe |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 12 2007, 4:14 PM |
geez this thread is getting all kinds of celbritys John Doe,Jimbo,Cleetus,Grammer Queen,who next? |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 12 2007, 4:45 PM |
Hey Jimmy Crack Corn,
Here's a toast to you.
Otis from Mayberry |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 12 2007, 5:17 PM |
Hey otis. It's me Rubin Kincaid from the Partridge Family. I'm glad we can all sign our names now. |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 12 2007, 5:46 PM |
would it not be better to get back to 95 hockey.Or is it to hard to keep a one track mind. |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 12 2007, 6:23 PM |
It's not are fault,,, Jimbo started first!! His kid is "one of the top 17" so he had no business posting here and getting the lowly AA"s all fired up. |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 12 2007, 6:39 PM |
Just one of the best Goalers in all of the land. Just look out for those shots from outside the blue line!
Swiss Cheese |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 12 2007, 6:37 PM |
Great point..
The first rule of this or any thread is to never, ever use your name. To do so only invites criticism, sarcasm, name calling and verbal abuse. The spelling and grammatical errors are not as important given the IQ of most posters to this thread, but signing one's name is just asking for trouble.
Second, one should never trumpet one's victory too much. Clearly, the AAAs have come a long way. The 95 players and coaches deserve a great deal of praise for their efforts. However, there are far too many AAA has-beens and wannabes on this thread to warrant such action. Just be happy with the win and move on.
Finally, never, ever praise the coach publicly. This may result in them wanting to continue to do these thankless jobs. Better to limit your boot-licking to buying them a beer at the next break between tournament games like the rest of us do.
Having beat this subject to death, I suggest we return to our traditional menu of AA coach-bashing, green v. gold chest-beating and other irrelevant hockey discussions. Once again, congratulations to the AAAs.
And now back to your regularly scheduled program...
|
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 12 2007, 8:04 PM |
I think this is a lesson well learned to all in why you don't post your name. But that was fun......... any other takers who would like to post their real name out there because Cleetus, Rubin and Otis are ready to pounce. |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 12 2007, 8:12 PM |
Well said Anonymous! Jimmy did get hammered but at least he took it like a man. This was better than watching reruns of all the Rocky movies and Jerry Springer! Can it get any better than this? Grooooovy Baby!
Austin Powers
|
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 12 2007, 8:17 PM |
Jimmy,
I have to take your side in this, you haven't done anything wrong.
Maybe we can get together for a little Grey Goose.
Mel Gibson |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 12 2007, 8:20 PM |
Hey 8:12,
Jimmy,
BOHICA (Bend over here it comes again!)
Mandingo Warrior |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 12 2007, 9:01 PM |
Ouch! Leave Jimmy alone! The poor gut must be getting hemroids by now! This sounds like a case for "preparation H". |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 12 2007, 9:09 PM |
Heard LMHA is looking for a coach next year. |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 12 2007, 10:37 PM |
It doesn't matter if Jim is right or wrong. At least he has the balls to attack his name to what he writes. |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 13 2007, 6:28 AM |
Yeah, and I like little boys.
Michael Jackson |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 13 2007, 4:02 PM |
hey one goalie Jim you find out thursday how good your goalies are when you meet the chiefs. A much better coached team.with some not good enough knights.That will kick a-s. |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Jr Knights 1995 AA - Part IINo score for this post | November 13 2007, 4:14 PM |
what they should do is kick the green team out and send them to FC |
| Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts. | |
|
Alliance Post Master (no login |