<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  

West Hill v.s Penguins

February 14 2012 at 3:42 AM
No score for this post
 

 
#19 and #91 on penguins mucked the ref's cornhole before the game, thats how they got away with the shit they did.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
AuthorReply
Anonymous

Re: West Hill v.s Penguins

No score for this post
February 14 2012, 4:22 AM 

Hey Angels of West Hill, isn't that 4 loses and a tie in the last few weeks? Maybe just admit that you were totally dominated on the ice and on the scoreboard. Let the panic and excuses begin.

By the way, has your coaching staff learned to count yet? I know, 2 in the box means only 3 on the ice. Subtraction is a bugger.


SHOOOOOOOOOT yourself.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous

Re: West Hill v.s Penguins

No score for this post
February 14 2012, 4:54 AM 

Watched the game - West Hill was outplayed plain and simple. No excuses about the refereeing. All of those penalties were totally deserved. West Hill just focused on the referee rather than the game for the first little bit and it did them in. First two Penguins goals were beauties.

As for the too many men call - it was supposed to be 5 on 3, so if there were four guys on the ice, you could think it might have been an honest mistake, but when you have five guys on the ice instead of three - that's just people not paying attention. Let's not forget the guy who left the box, skated tot he middle of the ice, then turned around and went to the box 10 second after the too many men call - caught a big break on that one.

West Hill did not generate many chances and turned the puck over regularly inside their own zone.


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous

Re: West Hill v.s Penguins

No score for this post
February 14 2012, 6:57 AM 

just "Shooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooot"

and no worries




 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

Re: West Hill v.s Penguins

No score for this post
February 15 2012, 2:42 AM 

everyone is goin to the show...congrats

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous

Re: West Hill v.s Penguins

No score for this post
February 18 2012, 2:21 PM 

Perhaps the time keeper should keep to time keeping and not telling players that they should leave the box.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous

Re: West Hill v.s Penguins

No score for this post
February 18 2012, 2:24 PM 

Too many people telling the kids what to do - time keeper should stick to time keeping and not telling players they should leave the box - obviously not paying any attention at all.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous

Re: West Hill v.s Penguins

No score for this post
February 18 2012, 3:17 PM 

HAHAHA -- whatever. Referee AND linesman explained to player that he shouldn't have left box - and by the way - the timekeeper keeps track of the penalties so it is his job to tell players when to leave box - I was sitting behind penalty boxes and he didn't tell kid to leave the box. Try chirping about a sport you may actually know something about like tetherball

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Current Topic - West Hill v.s Penguins
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  
Find more forums on HockeyCreate your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2013 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement