I know most other people come to these
sites without a clue then reinforse what others have written. I
have tried to correct them about percentage of errors of memedicine
and science in general being a high percentage, but that didn't sink
in. I speak from experience on this as Ihave numerous credits in
physics, medicine, psychology, electronics, to the extent where I
have personaly encountered degrees wearing idiots in school. 

My father and brother became extremely wealthy selling the gold
certificates that everyone else seems to be positive is burried at
the summit, but they know because they believe in Lindy's fairy
tale. You might ask did the verdict people realy read the family
accounts of the kidnap, but then the verdict people didn't know
anyone actualy involved in the case, but they are experts, sort
of?

I also used to hear of the case first hand, but knew these >experts
to be vehement in their convictions, and realized they would
promote >half truths to counter what I knew from first hand
encounter of people in the case. 

It was not a kidnap, but a feeble attempt at that to cover an
accident that Anne tried to explain in the first nursey note >that
Lindbergh found, erased part of and wrote over to fool Anne insrting
it back into the envelope and sealing it. The Salutation (Dear
Sir) is Anne's, the rest is written over erased words, but I was
able to bring out photographicly some of the erased writing, which
is also Anne's writing.

Anne continualy refered to Charley's dissapearance as an accident, and later books by Berg and other have reported on Lindbergh's control of Anne by reporting that she would go to her room locking herself in.