Murdered Obama Church Choirmaster's Sinclair Contact

http://www.rense.com/general81/der.htm

Lawrence Sinclair 3-28-8

Donald Young, the gay choirmaster at Obama's church, telephoned me not long before he was murdered. How did he know who I was and how to contact me before I went public with my allegations about Obama?

I was not living in Minnesota when I first contacted the Obama campaign about Obama's meetings with me in 1999 for the purpose of taking cocaine and sex.

Between September 2007 and November, 2007 I left a total of four (4) different cell phone numbers with the office of the Obama campaign. This was necessary because I had to adjust the telephone number to correspond with each new location where I lived in that period. I have explained in my blog how I slowly made my way north to Minnesota before settling there.

I have never said that I met Donald Young in any face to face meeting. But I did have contact with him several times. Each time Mr. Young instigated the contact.

Nobody else, other than the Obama campaign, had a record of my constantly adjusted numbers. And I did not go public with my allegations until after Mr. Young was murdered.

So, just how did Mr. Young know who I was? How did he know my cell phone number? (Please note that I have never said the exact number of times Mr. Young and I had contact. Nor have I stated the content of our exchanges. That and other information about the matter is reserved for the appropriate channels. I am providing this factual information to counteract the deliberate misinformation that a small army of internet warriors are spreading on the net in an attempt to distract attention from Obama's past).

Why are people so scared of what I have to say about Obama?

http://larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com/2008/04/03/why-are-people-so-scraed-of-what-i-have-to-say-about-obama/

Posted on Thursday, April 3, 2008.

No Smoke Without Fire

The frenzied personal attacks on me by Obama supporters have reached a new intensity lately. You have to wonder why. Is it because they fear that there is no smoke without fire? My smoke seems to be bothering them. It’s like they are gasping for air.

Their latest trick to distract attention from the sex and drugs Obama did with me in November 1999 is to re-write my life. They claim to have dug up new scraps of information about my past, my parents, my distant relatives-in-law and former neighbors, some of whom have no relation or connection to me at all.

They need not have bothered. In January 2008, when I went public with my allegations about Obama, I volunteered to serious journalists from the mainstream media and other serious investigators all that is relevant about my health, my criminal record, my sexual orientation and my former lifestyle.

The new scraps produced by the Obama supporters are half-truths, careless mis-identifications and false assumptions. They have mixed and stirred them to create a caricature which they hope will cause the public to disbelieve what I said about Obama.

They don’t care about the truth. So what do they care if their lies hurt innocent bystanders? If they think it will help Obama they will say anything.

Their latest emphasis on attacking and mocking my parents and neighbors is intended to intimidate me and cause me to withdraw my allegations. One of them has said as much – he has actually used the word “blackmail”. The threat is there in black and white. Shut up or we go after your family!

The Obama Internet Attack Unit

Is this what Obama meant in his interview before the South Carolina primary when he said he was setting up a bloggers unit to attack anything negative that was said about him? Is that what the new Obama Truth Squad is about - the one recently announced in Indiana?

Follow the Money

I read today that one of his loudmouth Internet warriors is going to invest in the most comprehensive background search package he can find and have it directed at me and my parents and relatives and people of no relation at all to me. He asked for help in locating a super-duper set-up. He said “cost is no real issue”. I guess not when you are taking in over a million dollars a day! Is this how the money Obama is being spent?When the Obama campaign reports its accounts to the election commission do they specify how much they spend on attacking individual citizens in order to suppress the truth about Obama’s past?

Well, I guess they are going to have to try harder and spend more money than they bargained for. I am not going to shut up about the sex and drugs Obama did with me in November 1999. I am not going to say something happened that did not happen and I am not going to say something that did happen, didn’t.

In fact I will stand on the roof tops and scream every sordid detail of what did happen, before I would let his staff, supporters, hacks and camp-followers on the Internet intimidate me. I will not back down.

Obama Lies Lately

Barrack Obama has been called out in the media for his lies about the Selma March and the links he claimed there was between his father coming to the USA and Jack Kennedy. Those lies have been out there for a long time, but the media has only just now begun to examine them. The fact that they were linked from here may have helped. Obama’s false claims about being Professor of Constitutional Law at the University of Chicago have also been found out.

We’ve all seen how he dissembled in the case of Pastor Wright and other matters. Why would anyone think he would not do all he could to prevent the truth emerging about his drug use and gay sexual practices in 1999?

Donald Young and the Chicago Police

As far as my statements about Donald Young are concerned, this is how I see it. I have done what I believe to be in the best interest of his family by contacting the Chicago PD with my affidavit. I took the route of submitting an affidavit because the CPD failed to respond to my earlier communications. In my cover letter I have stated very clearly to the CPD that my affidavit does not contain the content of all conversations and text messages between Donald Young and myself. I will reveal all of that to them when they take my evidence. I am prepared to give that evidence on oath. I’d ask you to forget Barrack Obama for a moment. How would any of you feel if your son, daughter, brother, sister, mother or father were murdered and someone came forward with information that might help the police find the killer, but the police ignored the information because it might highlight the fact that a popular political candidate may have very well been associated with your loved one in a way that would embarrass him politically? And what if they ignored the information because they were worried it might reveal that the same politician may have been associated with the murderer or murderers?

After the NIU shooting, Barrack Obama said he wanted do something about gun violence? Donald Young was the victim of gun violence -shot five times in his own home in execution style. Is Barrack Obama doing all he should about it? Is he volunteering information to the police about his personal relationship with Donald Young and about how he used him as apolitical fixer in the matter of my allegations? If the police are looking for a motive in Donald’s death should they not at least investigate that angle?

I’ll Keep on Keeping On.

From where I set I see all the hysterical claims about me. I see how the Obama supporters work themselves up into a lather as they sit hidden behind their computer screens and make up stories about me. But, I also see them failing to shut me up. In fact I see how they have made me more determined than ever to keep going until all my allegations about Obama drug use and gay sexual adventures with me in 1999 is out in the public domain.

The Obama followers should take note. If you say things about me that are not true, then I am going to let you know. I will continue to move forward, I will continue to fight, and I will continue to demand Barrack Obama be held accountable.

Let the American people know the fact and let them decide.

Article and comments:

http://larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com/2008/04/03/why-are-people-so-scraed-of-what-i-have-to-say-about-obama/

ATTN: FOX,CBS,CNN,ABC,NBC,MSNBC; I Will Disclose Drivers Name on LIVE Nationwide TV

Posted by larrysinclair0926 on Wednesday, May 7, 2008

http://larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com/2008/05/07/attn-foxcbscnnabcnbcmsnbc-i-will-disclose-drivers-name-on-live-nationwide-tv/

Attention to all the media outlets that Barack Obama supporters and bloggers have claimed have investigated my claims and found them to be lies! While I and each of you know that such claims of your investigations are FALSE, and while you and I know that you have chosen to believe the false statements of Barack Obama’s paid and unpaid internet warriors, I will allow that to slide.

I hereby challenge all News outlets that have been represented as investigating my claims about Obama’s actions in 1999 to be untrue to Open up a slot LIVE, nationwide broadcast and I will disclose the identity of the Driver for Five Star Limo Service who: introduced me to Barack Obama, who witnessed Barack Obama obtaining drugs for both of us, and who witnessed Barack Obama engaging in a sexual act with me.

Now you can report this and stop playing your little “I Love BO” games or you can sit and allow the Axelrod/Obama team and their Internet hit squad, who have already posted edited documents about me, my personal information including my Social Security Number and who have also recently began posting my families personal Information (social security numbers, etc..) to begin attacking the driver and his family as they have done to everyone else who refuses to accept their word that I am lying.

Now we already know NBC/MSNBC will do nothing other than make false claims and assist in the circulation of fake newspaper article to scare the unbiased media away. So to NBC, I say, I look forward to meeting all of you in the very near future to hear your explanations.

Barack Obama and David Axelrod have knowingly engaged in the attacks against me and my family and the illegally obtaining of personal information and records and distributing such. They have personally approved these actions and I intend to prove just that.

Barack Obama, you say you do not want to tell the people what they want to hear, but you want to tell the truth? Well here’s your chance, on live TV face to face?

http://www.rense.com/general81/obbi.htm

Presidential hopeful Barack Obama is tangled up in a gay-murder probe as insiders ask: How much does the Democratic candidate really know about the shooting death of the choir director at his controversial Chicago church? Our blockbuster Special Report reveals shocking charges of a link between gay murder victim Donald Young and Obama - and a private investigator's stunning claim the choir director was killed to silence him. It's must reading - only in GLOBE!

IS OBAMA ON DRUGS?

Written by Dr. Jack Wheeler

Thursday, 22 May 2008

Obama's Gaffes Start To Pile Up. Sounds like a headline from this week's newspapers, right? Nope, it's from the Chicago Sun-Times over a year ago, March 28, 2007. One of the most glaring gaffes mentioned is his claim that "because of what happened in Selma, Alabama, because some folks are willing to march across a bridge, [his parents] got together and Barack Obama Jr. was born."

The famous "Bloody Sunday" march over the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma, Alabama took place on March 7, 1965. Obama's parents "got together" around November, 1960 as he was born August 4, 1961.

Bear in mind that he made that claim in Selma to an audience commemorating the Selma march, the date of which was clear to everyone.

So Obambi has been gaffe-ridden for some time. Another beauty occurred on May 8, 2007: In a campaign speech, he said 10,000 people had died in a tornado that hit Greensburg, Kansas a few days earlier. The death toll was 12.

In the past few weeks, however, the O-gaffes have been proliferating.....

.....A neuroscientist with years of research into drug abuse and brain chemistry tells To The Point that the behavior exhibited by Obama is consistent with the use of either amphetamines or cocaine.......

Complete article here:

http://www.tothepointnews.com/content/view/3208/2/

Posted by Larry Sinclair on Friday, June 6, 2008

http://larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com/2008/06/06/what-would-you-think/

THIS IS ONLY A QUESTION “WHAT WOULD YOU THINK?” AND SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN AS A STATEMENT OF ANY KIND.

Here is something for you to think about. What would you think, if you learned that not only is the Limo Driver real, but that he was/is more than just a casual friend with Obama? How about if you found out that the driver had an on going business relationship, not only with Obama but with some other BO associates as well?

Now remember, I am asking what you would think “if” these things came to light? What would you think of the media and of Chicago authorities, and even of some federal agencies, if you were to learn these things to be true? What would you think if you learned that some very large media companies (in and outside they Chicago area) knowingly and intentionally decided not to report something they KNEW to be factual, that they KNEW would show me to be telling the truth? What if these same media companies decided not to report something that could tie a presidential candidate to other illegal activities?

What would you think of our democratic process if you learned all of these things to be true??

http://larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com/2008/06/06/what-would-you-think/

OBAMA SUPPORTER STATES HE/SHE WILL KILL ME IF I DO NOT CANCEL NPC EVENT

Posted by Larry Sinclair on Friday, June 13, 2008

This person joined Youtube on June 10, 2008 to send me threats against my life. Google and Youtube both are responsible for allowing this to occur from their web sites. They have been notified and have not responded nor agreed to identify the sender of these out right threats.

Let it be known here and now that no threats are going to cause me to cancel any appearance next week and my security will be instructed to take any action necessary to ensure my safety. This is the kind of stuff that is promoted and encouraged by DemocraticUnderground.com, Daily Kos, Taylor Marsh, and MYBarackObama.com as well as Obama for America.

Death Threat Messages & Comments here:

http://larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com/2008/06/13/obama-supporter-states-heshe-will-kill-me-if-i-do-not-cancel-npc-event/

Larry Sinclair - Obama's First Political Prisoner
By Webster G. Tarpley
6-23-8

WASHINGTON DC - Tonight political prisoner Larry Sinclair is spending his sixth night in the DC Jail, the victim of a Gestapo-style enemies' list operation carried out just three blocks from the White House last Wednesday afternoon.

Sinclair had come to the National Press Club to detail his charges that the self-proclaimed Democratic presidential nominee Barack Hussein Obama had indulged in two homosexual encounters complete with crack cocaine in early November 1999, that Obama was complicit in the December 2007 assassination of Donald Young, the gay choirmaster of Jeremiah Wright's Trinity United Church of Christ, and that's Obama's resident perception monger, David Axelrod, had paid the pornographic website Whitehouse.com $750,000 to organize a campaign of character assassination against Sinclair, culminating in a faked polygraph test. At the close of the press conference, Sinclair was arrested inside the press club by US Marshals and DC police, apparently based on an old Delaware warrant.

GESTAPO TACTICS IN THE NATIONAL PRESS CLUB, THE TEMPLE OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT?

Where are the civil libertarians? Where are the paladins of the ACLU? Where is the outcry and the indignation? Is no one concerned about threats to lynch a gay man for political reasons in the heart of the nation's capital? Where are the left liberals who have been ostensibly so concerned about civil rights and civil liberties from Nixon to Bush-Cheney? Perhaps they are sleeping, or perhaps they have drunk the Obama Kool-Aid and have become morally insane.

Or perhaps they are so obsessed with the reform of the FISA law and the danger that Bush might be listening in to their telephone calls that they do not notice when a prominent critic of a presidential candidate who is infamously a darling of the establishment media is actually arrested, taken into custody and led away, the target of Gestapo tactics in the National Press Club, the sanctum sanctorum of freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and the First Amendment generally.

Surely the weak sisters who have joined Obama's fifth column are morally insane when they joke about how Barky's Myrmidons were able to arrest Sinclair. If the First Amendment does not apply to speech which is not popular with the establishment and the mob, then the First Amendment does not exist at all, for anybody. Any journalist or writer should be able to see that they themselves may be next, now that the US Marshals are serving as the "Fight the Smears" enforcement arm of the Obama campaign. Selective and vindictive prosecution, anyone?

The mere fact that Larry Sinclair had been able to hold such a successful press conference was already a serious defeat for the corrupt and brutal Obama machine.

Sinclair had appeared in the Holeman Lounge before more than a hundred journalists, with 10 cameras set up on tripods in the back of the room. The number of handheld cameras, camcorders, and tape recorders was beyond counting. The press conference was dignified, businesslike, factual. There was no screaming, no disruption, no threats or insults.

Every journalist who wanted to ask a question was given ample opportunity to do so, and about three dozen questions were asked. Reasonable follow-ups were allowed.

There were journalists from Britain, from Germany, from India, from China. Most of the questions represented honest attempts to pin down the facts of what was being alleged.

Sinclair's honesty compared favorably to most politicians today. He started his presentation with a detailed admission of his criminal record, jail time served, his pending court motion to dismiss an old Colorado warrant, and a statement that his troubles with the law date back more than 20 years to 1980-1986.

In the question-and-answer segment, Sinclair gave a straight answer to every question he was asked. He did not dodge questions, he did not prevaricate, he did not refuse to answer questions, and he did not bungle his answers. Sinclair has made serious mistakes in life, as he readily concedes. But Sinclair is not a candidate, not a person who has to be evaluated by the public and then accepted or rejected.

Sinclair comes forward as a witness with a series of allegations to make and a story to tell. It is up to public opinion and most emphatically the news media to evaluate those allegations and those facts, including through the efforts of enterprising investigative journalists anxious to make a name for themselves by finding out the truth about what is potentially the biggest political scandal of the century. Obama, after all, is the candidate of whom we know little and who needs urgently to be evaluated.

The issue posed is not what you think about Larry Sinclair. The overriding issue is the presidency in a time of military defeat, institutional crisis, and economic breakdown.

HOMOPHOBIC DEATH THREATS AGAINST SINCLAIR

Obama's lemming legions, and especially his notorious mercenary squadristi of the Internet, had done everything possible to sabotage and disrupt Sinclair's press conference. One Obama backer had issued a categorical death threat against Sinclair in terms that made it abundantly clear that a homophobic hate murder might be in the offing. The FBI and the District of Columbia police had shown zero interest in offering Sinclair protection against a possible hit by one of Obama's fanatics.

Once it is accepted that police agencies can intervene in political campaigns, it is possible to a rest or detain almost anyone if the interest is great enough. The old warrant used to incarcerate Sinclair most probably refers to events already covered by the statute of limitations.

If nothing can be found at this level, there are always old parking tickets and library fines that can be ginned up. Any political candidate who has had dealings with the Federal Elections Commission can be hauled in on some minor technical violation. The precedent established by last Wednesday's events at the National Press Club is exceedingly ominous for the public life of this country.

The irony is that repression is now being carried out not to help the Republicans but under ultra-left cover, to help the radical subversive Obama.

Since the warrant used as the pretext to arrest Sinclair apparently came from Delaware, our attention naturally turns to Senator Joe Biden, the incorrigible blowhard and defeated presidential candidate who is now known to be angling for the post of vice president or Secretary of State in a future Obama regime.

We also note that Biden's son, the nepotist Beau Biden, is the current Attorney General of Delaware. As the cops would say, the Biden machine, anxious to ingratiate themselves with Obama, had the means, motive, and opportunity to arrange this outrageous arrest. For those gullible enough to believe that civil liberties might improve under an Obama regime, this ought to provide a reality shock.

Do not assume that civil liberties will get better under Obama; the evidence is now that they will get worse. Obama's National Press Club caper is as blatant as anything seen under Bush ­ and Barky is not even in the White House.

At the end of his detailed indictment of Obama, Sinclair demanded information on four points. The first involves Obama as phone records for November 3, 1999 through November 8, 1999 - the time frame of the two allegedly encounters between Obama and Sinclair, mediated by Paramjit Multani of Five Star Limo at O'Hare Airport. The second involves Obama's phone records for September 2007 - December 23, 2007, when Sinclair was receiving probing phone calls from Donald Young about how much Sinclair had revealed concerning Obama - calls that ended when Young was found dead from multiple gunshot wounds just before Christmas 2007.

Sinclair's third demand for clarification touches communications from Obama, Axelrod, and campaign manager David Plouffe to Whitehouse.com in January and February 2008. Sinclair's fourth point regards possible payments by Obama, Obama's campaign, Axelrod, Plouffe, and Axelrod's AKP Message and Media to Whitehouse.com in that same time frame of January-February 2008.

OBAMA MUST ANSWER, NOT EVADE

It is now up to Obama to answer these charges. It is imperative that this be done now, without further delay. No responsible citizen wants a president who can be blackmailed and thus turned into a puppet because he is hiding secrets about bisexual activities, crack cocaine, political murder, and character assassination campaigns.

It is also up to the great news organizations, including ABC, CBS, NBC, The New York Times, and the Washington Post, to carry out their responsibility to the public. These news organizations should not play the role of kept courtesans of those in political power. As Sinclair pointed out, he has told his story and has thus done everything he can.

It is now up to the great media concerns to locate and interview the limo driver Paramjit Multani, to investigate the relevant telephone records, and above all to question Obama himself about this very serious matter. It is not up to the corporate media to sit back and sniff about whether a Sinclair has conclusively proven his own case to their satisfaction or not; the proving or disproving is the responsibility of the media, and let them make damn sure that they get it right.

By today's journalistic standards, Sinclair's allegations are extraordinarily substantive already, especially when compared with some other major scandal allegations heard during the primaries. Sinclair has filed a federal civil suit against Obama and Axelrod, complete with sworn affidavits and court papers.

This means that he is willingly risking Rule 11 penalties for filing a frivolous lawsuit.

He has also made statements to the Chicago police about his contacts with murder victim Donald Young. These steps represent a very high degree of public commitment by Sinclair to the truth of what he is saying.

Compare this to the shoddy standards of the New York Times which, on February 21, 2008 published and prominently displayed on its front page an innuendo about a supposed sex affair between Senator McCain and a certain Vicki Iseman, a Washington lobbyist. Not one single solitary named source was cited to support this innuendo. Or, take the case of Vanity Fair magazine, the house organ of decadent left liberalism, which included a slander piece entitled "The Comeback Id" by Todd Purdom in its July 2008 issue. Here again, there was not one single named source who was willing to have his or her name publicly associated with Purdom's sleazy allegations.

It is painfully obvious that there is one set of journalistic standards for the Perfect Master Obama, and another and much laxer set for the competition. This is intolerable.

NO PRIVACY FOR THOSE WHO WANT TO ACCESS THE NUCLEAR BUTTON

It is fair to say that the idea of a private sphere for US presidential candidates about which the general public is not entitled to know anything became obsolete at the same time that intercontinental ballistic missiles with nuclear warheads became available around 1960 to 1965. Since then, every presidential candidate has in effect appeared before the public asking to get his or her hands on the thermonuclear button that can start World War III.

At this point, the notion of a private sphere for presidential candidates becomes wholly untenable. In this day and age, we have the right to know everything but everything about presidential nominees who are asking for our votes.

We have a right to know their full personal histories, with no exceptions, no omissions, and no withheld documents.

We have a right to know if they are HIV-positive and whether they ever registered for the draft.

We want to know if they have received electroshock, psychopharmaca, and whether they have been treated by a psychiatrist.

We have a right to see their birth certificate, their college transcript, their senior thesis if they wrote one, their law school transcript, their passport, papers from earlier times in public office, and all other relevant documents.

We have a right to know about their mother, their father, their sister, their brother, their Aunt Tilly, their best friends at all stages of life, their boyfriends, their girlfriends, their pets, their backers, their sponsors, their gurus, their controllers, and their associates of every kind.

More than a right to know these things, we have an imperative duty to find them out.

For they are asking to get their hands on the thermonuclear button, the misuse of which can unleash a thermonuclear fireball that will not respect any aspect of the privacy of ourselves and our family.

Naturally, candidates are free to make their own choices in life just like everybody else: they can choose their religion, their personal associations, their forms of recreation, and all the rest in any way that they like.

But none of this - absolutely nothing - can be claimed as a secret off limits to the attention of the public. All of it must be thoroughly investigated, aired, and published when the presidency is at stake.

An Air Force crewman at a missile silo in the Dakotas goes through a background check which leaves scant room for privacy. We must demand nothing less from presidential candidates.

OBAMA'S COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT AND ALLEGED COCAINE USE

Larry Sinclair alleges that Obama has indulged in crack cocaine. Those familiar with the public literature about the current tenant of the White House know very well that there are many indications that his extraordinarily low level of performance may derive from cognitive impairment brought on by habitual cocaine use. How many more coke fiends in the White House are compatible with the further national survival of the United States?

Ronald Reagan notoriously suffered from cognitive impairment and constantly made his remarks off index cards which he kept hidden in his hands. Those index cards were a low-tech version of the glass plates of the Teleprompter upon which Obama relies.

As soon as he cannot read his words off those glass plates, Obama begins to stutter, to stammer and babble, to hem and to haw, repeatedly losing his syntax and constantly interjecting "um" and "you know." What if Obama's cocaine use really did extend beyond 1981, as he suggests in his memoir, and continued all the way to late 1999 at the very least, as Sinclair is alleging?

That might suggest that Obama suffers from greater cognitive impairment than Bush, as Obama's incredible series of gaffes at the end of the primaries also indicates. Larry Sinclair stressed during his press conference that he has been a gay man all his life, and that he regarded the crack cocaine issue as the central one, at least until the time of the Donald Young murder.

During the press conference, Sinclair announced that he was willing to make his own personal medical records, including mental health records, available to responsible representatives of accredited news organizations, at their own expense.

That means that Sinclair is much more forthcoming about his medical history than Obama, who has withheld his medical records and offered a single meaningless page of advertising copy signed by his personal physician. And remember that Sinclair is not running for any office, while Obama wants to be president.

TWO MONTHS TO THE ROLL CALL OF THE STATES, AUGUST 27

The Democratic Party still has more than two months in which these very serious, substantive, and detailed allegations against its presumptive candidate can be thoroughly investigated.

It is unthinkable that any responsible political leader would be willing to see Obama receive the nomination while this sword of Damocles hangs over his head. Larry Sinclair's videotape has been on the Internet since mid-January, and it has at various times been the object of discussion on something approaching a million websites.

The issues are Obama's crack cocaine use, his bisexuality, his possible involvement in the Donald Young assassination, and the allegations of character assassination and harassment against Sinclair funded by the Obama campaign.

Karl Rove knows all about each one of these points, and there is no way to deter Karl Rove and his cohorts.

So, although it may seem incomprehensible to Obama's drooling acolytes, the interest of the Democratic Party is best served by thorough airing of these allegations to before the roll call of the states is held on August 27, 2008 - and this is exactly what Sinclair has been trying to do since mid-January.

If Sinclair had been a GOP deployment, he would simply have waited for September or October to come forward.

There are of course those who lament and regret that it is necessary to dredge up the sordid details of a figure like Obama. They say that it is better to use political campaigns to talk about issues.

This document may sound plausible, but it is totally wrong, and the fault rests with Obama.

First, Obama does not campaign on issues in any systematic way. He presents himself as the Perfect Master, the Anointed One, the Savior, the Messiah, the Mahdi. His hysterical followers are obsessed, not with a political program or a set of issues, but with the personality cult of Obama. This means that any attempt to engage Obama on the issues is by definition an impotent and self-defeating tactic.

The only useful objections that can be made to Obama are ad hominem biographical revelations designed to show that he is not so anointed after all, and that his ability to walk on water has been overestimated.

Then there is also the matter of Obama's notorious duplicity and flip-flops even where he does have specific positions on certain issues. First Obama wanted a fixed schedule for getting out of Iraq, but Samantha Power revealed that this was not the case at all. Barky said he wanted a different kind of foreign policy, and then he pandered to AIPAC, probably lying through his teeth in the process. First, Obama wanted to help the lower income brackets, but now he is talking about cutting the corporate income tax. Obama attacked free trade in Ohio and Pennsylvania, even as his top economic controller, Austan Goolsbee of the Friedmanite Chicago school reassured the Canadians that this was just election posturing; now Obama has told Fortune magazine that he likes free trade and is devoted to "free markets."

First, Obama was going to be tough on FISA; now he is going along with the Democratic congressional leaders as they attempt to appease Bush.

Obama had built his career on ethics in government and reducing the role of political contributions; now he has turned his back on the only meager legislative achievements by becoming the first presidential candidate in modern times to repudiate matching funds in the general election.

On all these points, to attempt a substantive debate with Obama is a fool's errand. The only way to pin Barky down is through pointed reference to crucial facts in his own background, biography, and associations which cannot be changed or swept under the rug. Any other approach is deliberate impotence and capitulation.

FREE LARRY SINCLAIR!

In the meantime, Larry Sinclair is still sitting in the DC jail. He could be extradited to Delaware at any time.

What kind of a presidential campaign are we going to have when critics of the most radical subversive to ever get this close to the presidency have to worry about a knock on the door in the middle of the night? It is time to put massive public pressure on the Obama campaign to drop their enemies' list operation against Larry Sinclair, and to release him from jail at once.

Webster G. Tarpley is the author of Obama - The Postmodern Coup: Making of a Manchurian Candidate?.


To add comments, go here:
http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/06/22/free-larry-sinclair-obama% e2%80%99s-political-prisoner/#more-3206

Saturday, March 7, 2009

OBAMA ADMINISTRATION SUPERVISED BLOGGERS ENGAGE IN ID THEFT

A group of Bloggers supervised and paid by the Obama Administration posted recently that they have repeatedly contacted Medicaid attempting to obtain my medical information. This is, in case you did not know, a crime and constitutes ID Theft.

"After attempting to contact Medicaid officials without success - we have decided we must act as a group."

Your words in print, not mine idiots!

The fact that these people openly admit that they have attempted to obtain Medical information from Medicaid should scare the hell out of Americans all across this Country. Make no mistake about it, these are the same individuals that for over a year now have admitted to contacting government agencies and giving my name, date of birth, social security number representing themselves as me. This has and continues to take place with the full knowledge of and support of the Obama Administration and is supervised by and paid for by the Obama camp.......

More here:

http://larrysinclair-0926.blogspot.com/2009/03/obama-administration-supervised.html