<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Index  

Pumper VS Springer

November 7 2008 at 6:27 PM

  (Login justrick)

For what it is worth, I am just starting to like my Benjamin 392 pumper. This is a work out when you are trying to shoot accurately and control breathing. Here I am pumping the rifle and then I am all out of breath to take a shot.
With my GAMO CGX, one pull of the cocking lever and I am ready to rock and roll.
This is a very addictive sport. I find myself looking all over for innovations and other guns to learn about.
If there is a cure for this I hope I don't find out too soon, this is really enjoyable.
JustRick in Michigan

jusr rick in Michigan

 
 Respond to this message   
AuthorReply

(Premier Login oldcoot)
Forum Owner

Be sure to drop in at the main forum..

November 7 2008, 11:17 PM 

there are a lot more guns, all ages. Click on the link under my name.

daveb

www.vintageairgun.com

 
 Respond to this message   

(Login Jon88)

My 392 is my go to gun

November 16 2008, 5:11 PM 

In my opinion, as far as performance, quality, and value, the Benjamin 392 can't be beaten. Anytime I have a pest issue, it's my go to gun. It's performance is equal to, if not slightly better than my RWS 34, and that gun costs at least $70 more depending where you shop. Plus it's compact, you can leave it fully pumped for extended periods of time, and the only maitanence it really needs is a drop of pelgunoil every few hundred shots.
Out of the box my 392 was sighted in perfectly. I can hit targets the size of padlocks at 25 yards with open sites. I've since purchased a 397, and HB22 pistol. I love the quality. Up next is a Silver Streak for me.
If pumping is that much of an issue, pump assist models are available.

 
 Respond to this message   
Current Topic - Pumper VS Springer
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Index