Re: PSI for .460 OD .399 ID .061 WALL 6061 aluminum
No score for this post
April 5 2009, 1:16 PM
WOW, thanks for that link. By the way, the aluminum is 6061 T6. I was thinking of making a bulk fill adapter valve to mate with the standard valve body on the 22x0. I wanted to extend the inside of the valve by drilling deeper into that bulk fill adapter, increasing volume. My concern was the wall thickness right after the threading on that part, where the #9 o-ring goes, would be too thin to hold the 900 PSI of the C02. That calculator gives (the bar has a yield of 40kpsi) a working pressure of 4800PSI. Does that sound right?
Thanks,
Ben Benson
This message has been edited by BenBenson from IP address 98.19.153.7 on Apr 5, 2009 3:53 PM
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Re: PSI for .460 OD .399 ID .061 WALL 6061 aluminum
No score for this post
April 5 2009, 5:33 PM
WOW, thanks for that link. By the way, the aluminum is 6061 T6. I was thinking of making a bulk fill adapter valve to mate with the standard valve body on the 22x0. I wanted to extend the inside of the valve by drilling deeper into that bulk fill adapter, increasing volume. My concern was the wall thickness right after the threading on that part, where the #9 o-ring goes, would be too thin to hold the 900 PSI of the C02. That calculator gives (the bar has a yield of 40kpsi) a working pressure of 4800PSI. Does that sound right?
You're welcome.
That's what I get.(4800psi) Metal is stronger than many realise.
You're not modifying any threads if I'm reading that right?
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Re: PSI for .460 OD .399 ID .061 WALL 6061 aluminum
No score for this post
April 5 2009, 7:09 PM
I may modify the threads in a similar way that the biohazard valve reduced the threads a bit. I want to just make a (bulk fill) piece that would mate to the valve body of the standard 22x0 series, but making the hole that forms part of the inside of the valve deeper as to give the valve more volume.
This message has been edited by BenBenson from IP address 98.19.153.7 on Apr 5, 2009 7:09 PM
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Re: First could you fix your numbers? the wall is too thick or the id is wrong
No score for this post
June 26 2009, 3:29 PM
Good catch Walter. I'm not sure how I missed that, but I did.
I'm curious about your numbers though. I can't seem to replicate them using the calculator and posted material properties. (I tried 40000psi and 35000psi)
Are you using a different calculator or am I doing something wrong?
If I've not been doing this correctly, can you tell me where I'm going wrong?
Thanks in advance.
Gippeto
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
I was using the 35000psi min. yield strength from the alcoa pdf found in the wiki link, and the calculator on engineers edge. Safety factor used was 3.
Interesting how the results differ.
How are you deriving the allowable stress?
Looked this up;
2/3 yield or 1/4 ultimate??
Which one and why??
Thanks.
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.