Ruger MarkII & 22/45 Forum





We have moved to our own domain, free of ads!
Please join us at:
MarkII.org



(New Post have been disabled, this forum is read only. Come to our new forum)


Solow Mounts - where to buy them?

by Big Bad Mojo

does anybody know where i can buy these mounts on the internet or locally? i live in san jose, ca. i tried using the order line at www.solow.com but it's been disconnected. thanks!

Posted on Apr 25, 2003, 12:06 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index

Solow mounts

by Paul

go to www.rimfiresports.com Click store front page, then click new products. The go for $40.

Posted on Apr 25, 2003, 8:14 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Thanks to all...

by Bud

...for your responses and the sources for the information you provided.

Posted on Apr 25, 2003, 5:18 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index

What's a good Holster for MK512

by John J

I just got brand new Mark II Target with a bull 5 1/2

Can someone suggest a good holster for it at a reasonable price. I am in the woods alot, do a lot of plinking.



Posted on Apr 24, 2003, 11:44 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index

holster

by Aimhigh

John I dont know about affordable....but they don't get any gooder than this



wow or longer Aimhigh

Posted on Apr 25, 2003, 4:53 AM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


holster again

by Aimhigh

John I dont know about affordable....but they don't get any gooder than this




wow or longer Aimhigh

Posted on Apr 25, 2003, 4:58 AM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


holster thrice

by Aimhigh

John I dont know about affordable....but they don't get any gooder than this:



wow or longer Aimhigh

Posted on Apr 25, 2003, 5:01 AM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


holster thrice

by Aimhigh

John I dont know about affordable....but they don't get any gooder than this:



wow or longer Aimhigh

Posted on Apr 25, 2003, 5:06 AM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


ok try this

by Aimhigh

Ok I give up..........check Cabela's site for this :
Triple K Pouch Holster for Ruger Mk I and II
Item: ID-223529
Price: $49.99



Aimhigh

Posted on Apr 25, 2003, 5:12 AM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Here is the pic Aimhigh was trying to post:

by Radar

Well, I tried to post the pic and it just gives a link that goes to another page from Cabellas so here is the link to the cabellas page with the Tripple K:

http://www.cabelas.com/cabelas/en/templates/product/standard-item.jhtml?id=0012760223529a&navAction=push&navCount=5&indexId=cat20776&podId=0012760&catalogCode=ID&parentId=cat20776&parentType=index&rid=&_DARGS=%2Fcabelas%2Fen%2Fcommon%2Fcatalog%2Fitem-link

Another option is the Uncle Mike's holsters. They are Cordura (or cordura like?) and cost about $15.

Radar



Posted on Apr 25, 2003, 12:09 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


for farfal

by

Farfal,

The falling plates shoot is at 10 am on Sunday at western wayne county conservation assoc. It is open to the public and costs $4.00 for non-members. It runs until 3 pm. For more info, you can go to their website at www.wwcca.com. They have one the 4th sunday of every month.




Posted on Apr 23, 2003, 10:26 AM

Respond to this message

Return to Index

Glad you found out.

by farfal

I just gat a call late last evening from the Outdoor Pistol Chairman. I'm a member out there and just didn't want to send you on a wild goose chase. I haven't shot plates since the warm weather left. Guess I should have called the office instead of going to the Chairman. Will I see you there? I'll email you also.

Posted on Apr 25, 2003, 8:24 AM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Check your email (nt)

by farfal

nt

Posted on Apr 25, 2003, 8:55 AM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


old vs new mkII

by oldfeller

In 1977 I watched a buddy "torture test" a brand new mk2. threw it in the sand at the river with a full mag and the bolt open, kicked sand over it, dug it out, shook it out, racked a round, gave it a "bolt assist" with the heel of his hand and squeezed of 10 rounds with nary a hiccup. we shot a couple more boxes, no stovepipes, no nothing. went bang every time. I wanted one ever since. Yesterday i bought a barely used one along with winchester, remington and federal ammo. it ate the win. ammo with 2 fte`s, the remington with 1 ftf and a couple fte`s. the federal ammo caused over 50% fte. My question is for oldtimers who have owned older and newer mk2`s- did they just build them better back then? Perhaps the tolerances were a bit looser? This is the first ruger i have owned that i wasn`t thrilled with. thanks for your comments.

Posted on Apr 20, 2003, 9:36 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index

Welcome, Oldfeller!

by Radar

I am a "youngfeller", I guess. I have only had my MK II since October. But I do have a possible reason for your problem. If your gun was "barely used," it might not be broken in yet. I was told by members of this forum not to worry about any feeding/extraction/firing problems until I had a brick or two of high velocity (breaks the gun in better) ammo through my gun. For me it only took a box or two until I stopped having any trouble that wasn't caused by the ammo.

If you get some more rounds through your gun and are still having trouble, and you are sure it isn't a cleaning issue or something, you should give Ruger a call. Their customer service is excellent, and used or not, they would probably let you sent it to them to be tuned up for no charge.

Also, you probably aren't going to get too many responses on this site. We recently moved our forum to this location:
http://members.lycos.co.uk/blackan/forum/

I suggest you go there and re-post your question.

Hope this helps,
Radar

Posted on Apr 21, 2003, 12:01 AM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Mark II function

by joet47

I recently bought a Mark II and also noticed that there were several jams of one type or another when I first started to shoot it. I did notice that the failures became less the more I shot it. Now after many rounds it seems as reliable as my Old Mark I, which rarely ever fails.

Posted on Apr 24, 2003, 11:11 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


to scope or not to scope?

by Paul

I just got a mk2 target with 5.5 bull barrel. I would like to put a scope on it. What are my options? Cheap is good for me.

Posted on Apr 22, 2003, 8:03 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index

Re: to scope or not to scope?

by Bullseye

Paul,

You can get a BSA RD30 for around $33. Their inexpensive but you'll also have to factor in the cost for a scope mount. There's several no-gunsmithing versions available that will run you between $30 - $50. Just depends on what you want for your gun.

R,
Bullseye

Posted on Apr 24, 2003, 10:06 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


New to Forum ... thanks for the info

by

Hello,

This is the first time I've posted to this forum. I have been reading for a couple of weeks (I started at page 111 and worked forward). I've learned alot and wanted to say "thank you" to everyone who posted.

Posted on Apr 24, 2003, 7:00 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index

Welcome Pressley

by Bullseye

Happy to hear you've enjoyed the wealth of knowledge deposited here over the years on this forum. Please allow me the opportunity to cordially invite you to the new home of the Ruger Mark II & 22/45 Forum as eventually this website will be transferred to the new location.

The site is located at this link:
http://members.lycos.co.uk/blackan/forum/index.php?s=8580cba6212346a67d1f5962cd5630b6

Come on over and register! I look forward to exchanging ideas with you.

R,
Bullseye

Posted on Apr 24, 2003, 9:22 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Registered at new location =)

by Pressley

Bullseye,
Thank you for the information. I registered at the new location (username phgtwo).

Posted on Apr 24, 2003, 9:51 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Re: Registered at new location =)

by Bullseye

Great! See you around the Campus!

R,
Bullseye

Posted on Apr 24, 2003, 9:58 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Cycling

by Bud

Is the cycling on a Mark II due to the recoil or the gas?

Posted on Apr 19, 2003, 11:49 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index

Recoil

by Radar

We are moving our forum here:
http://members.lycos.co.uk/blackan/forum/index.php?s=5dcbf659405facac75a137cd4b500221
Come check it out.

Radar

Posted on Apr 20, 2003, 1:27 AM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Here is your answer...

by Rich

It is cycled by gas. It it a blow back design. The bolt is delayed from opening due to the weight of the bolt itself and the brass sticking to the chamber.

If you have any more questions, feel free to ask them here, I will do my best to answer them.

You others are getting a little rude with telling people to go to the other site. People probally dont want to go there because nobody is there, its a ghost town. Probally better off sending them a site that is active like www.rimfirecentral.com.

Rich

Posted on Apr 23, 2003, 5:30 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Sorry for the confusion...

by Radar

First, sorry if I was wrong. I thought it was Recoil.

Second, please look at this link:

http://www.network54.com/Hide/Forum/message?forumid=52578&messageid=1049650594

It is a link to a thread on this site. It tells about how J. Adams decided to move this forum to a better provider. It is not Rimfire Addicts. I am not trying to steal members from this forum, I am trying to direct them to the new home of this forum. Most of our forum members no longer check this site.

I asked J. Adams earlier this evening to post something at the top of the page with a link to the new site. Hopefully that will happen soon.

The new site is very nice, it has a link to click that shows you all of the new posts since your last visit, and it even has a search engine.

The address is:

http://members.lycos.co.uk/blackan/forum/

Everyone is welcome.

Bud, please post your question there. Bullseye and all of the rest of the old gang is there and post regularly. I could be wrong with my recoil answer. I am pretty sure the same question has been asked on this board before and that was the answer, but maybe I am confused.

Posted on Apr 24, 2003, 1:09 AM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Rich is right

by Radar

I went to Howstuffworks.com and did some research. Here is the page where it talks about Blowback versus Gas operated:

http://people.howstuffworks.com/machine-gun4.htm

And here is the page that talks about Recoil:

http://people.howstuffworks.com/machine-gun3.htm

Sorry for going off "half cocked," but I knew it wasn't a gas system.

Radar

Posted on Apr 24, 2003, 2:43 AM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Here's the most correct answer

by Bullseye

The cycling of the bolt in a Mark II pistol is due to both gas and recoil forces being exerted on the pistol.

It is a blowback design as are most semiautomatic rimfire pistols. This just means that the bolt isn't locked and held into place by a set of locking lugs (like a M-1911). Since the Mark II doesn't have a gas piston it isn't technically a gas operated weapon. Also, since the barrel is fixed and cannot move, it isn't strictly recoil operated one either. However, the forces of recoil play a part in cycling the bolt of the Mark II, since this recoil force is actually created by the backward pressure generated from the expanding cartridge gasses forcing the projectile forward down the barrel. So, these two forces act hand-in-hand to overcome the recoil spring tension and operate the Mark II bolt, thereby ejecting the empty cartridge casing.

To be a strictly gas operated action, it would need a certain amount of escaping gas to be syphoned off and sent rearward through a tube or vent to operate a gas piston, which in-turn cycles the bolt mechanically (like an M-14). Another form of gas operated action doesn't use a piston but the bolt has the piston feature built-in to it and is directly cycled by the vented hot gasses(like an M-16).

To be a stricly recoil operated pistol, the barrel would have to move and break free of a set of locking lugs, which holds the breech closed and the empty cartridge in place until after the projectile has cleared the barrel muzzle (again, like the M-1911).

Here's some useful definitions at the end of this post, to help validate the information I've provided.

Hope this helps,

R,
Bullseye


RECOIL OPERATION: Method of operating an automatic of semi-automatic firearm by making use of the force of recoil due to firing a bullet from the barrel. The barrel recoils under this force, and this rearward movement can be used to cycle the action, ejecting the spent cartridge and reloading the firearm.

RECOIL: The rearward motion or "kick" of a gun upon firing. Recoil in shooting, is the practical effect of Newton's Third Law of Motion: for every action there is and opposite and equal reaction. Recoil is typically explained in 3 separate terms: Generated Recoil; Physical Recoil; and Anticipated Recoil. For more information on recoil see the information block below.

GENERATED RECOIL: The amount of force exerted on the firearms action, stock or grip. The factors affecting this force are the charge or amount and type of powder in the cartridge and the weight of the projectile. The internal pressure is created by the rapidly expanding gasses that are created when the solid propellant or gun powder ignites and turns into a gas. The only way to modify the amount of force is to reduce the charge or the bullet weight. Generated recoil is a constant if all variable are left unchanged.

BLOWBACK: A type of semiautomatic or fully automatic gun design in which there is no mechanical locking of the bolt. Instead, the breech is held closed only by the weight and inertia of the bolt, with some slight assistance from the recoil spring, until the bullet leaves the muzzle. Classic examples of the blowback semiautomatic pistol designs are found in the Browning series of pocket-sized pistols in .25, .32 and .380 calibers as well as the famous Walther PP and PPK series of handguns. Nearly all successful submachine guns, including the popular Uzi and Ingram or MAC 10's as well as the HK MP5 family, use the blowback action. 2. A gun malfunction in which the powder gases escape rearward and into the action.

GAS OPERATION: A method of operating an automatic or semi-automatic firearm by diverting some of the propelling gas behind the bullet into a cylinder where it drives a piston. This piston is connected to the firearm's bolt and, under gas pressure, extracts the empty case and loads a fresh round. Alternatively, the gas can be channeled so as to strike the bolt or bolt carrier directly and thus move it.

GAS OPERATED: A type of firearm design commonly found on semi-automatic rifles, where propellant gas is used in a manor that cycles the action. The most common type of gas operated firearms are the AR-15 / M-16 family of rifles.

RECOIL OPERATION: Method of operating an automatic of semi-automatic firearm by making use of the force of recoil due to firing a bullet from the barrel. The barrel recoils under this force, and this rearward movement can be used to cycle the action, ejecting the spent cartridge and reloading the firearm.

With special thanks to the Gunnery Network for this reference information.

http://www.gunnerynetwork.com/glossary/g-glossary.html


Posted on Apr 24, 2003, 9:11 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


NRA contact information needed =)

by

I wanted to join the NRA, but I need the contact information (I threw away the card that came with my handgun). =)



Posted on Apr 24, 2003, 7:09 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index

Try this web address

by Bullseye

http://membership.nrahq.org/

R,
Bullseye

Posted on Apr 24, 2003, 7:30 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


22/45 or MK-2

by Scott O

I trying to decide between a 22/45 and a Mk-2. Looking at 5 1/2" bull barrel. Hesitant on the 22/45's polymer frame. Looking for advice. Thanks

Scott O

Posted on Apr 21, 2003, 12:21 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index

Re: 22/45 or MK-2

by Sumshooter

I wouldnt worry about it. I have sanded, used a router, drilled, and tapped several grip frames with no problems. They are great once you have installed 1911 .45 grips on them.

And this forum is in the process of moving to: http://members.lycos.co.uk/blackan/forum/

Hope to see you there.

Posted on Apr 21, 2003, 9:04 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


www.rimfireaddicts.com Dedicated .22 Message Board

by

Just a quick site plug.

www.rimfireaddicts.com

We cover all .22s from rifles to pistols. Yes including the beloved MarkII and 22/45s.

Stop by and check us out, and maybe stay for a while.

Posted on Apr 19, 2003, 7:56 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index

Mark II Target trigger removal

by

Can the average user remove the trigger from a Mark II target pistol? I would like to attempt to adjust the trigger screw, but I don't know how to get the pin out. Can anyone advise?

Posted on Apr 17, 2003, 11:44 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index

Re: Mark II Target trigger removal

by Radar

Look at the followig web page:

http://www.1bad69.com/ruger/index.htm

At the top of the page is a link "Diss/Reassemble for internals" that gives detailed instructions and pictures. The site was created by forum member, Yzguy.

We have pretty much moved our forum to a new location:

http://members.lycos.co.uk/blackan/forum/

Most of the forum activity is taking place there now.

Hope this helps,
Radar

Posted on Apr 18, 2003, 1:21 AM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


farfal, where's the falling plates?

by

Farfal, could you please email me the info for the falling plates shoot? I need to know if it's on one of my work weekends or not.

Thanks

Posted on Apr 14, 2003, 1:34 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index

I didn't forget you!

by Farfal

Sorry, I've been tied up. The match is Apr 27, Sunday. It's at Western Wayne County Conservation Association (that's a mouth full!) What I'm trying to find out if it's still open to the public. It's usually the last Sunday of the month. Problem is they'er trying to make it a league that runs May through August. I don't think it's a problem, but I want to make sure I don't lie to you. As soon as the chairman replys to me I'll get the info and directions to you.m You'll have a ball.

Posted on Apr 15, 2003, 7:03 AM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


re:falling plates

by

Thanks,
my email is wyandottemedic@yahoo.com
I am also registered on the new forum as Charley.
Hope to hear from you soon.

Posted on Apr 17, 2003, 8:16 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


New Forum

by Randomluck

Just a reminder that most everyone has moved over to the new forum located at

http://members.lycos.co.uk/blackan/forum/

It's a nice purty new home, come help us knock off the construction dust!


Posted on Apr 14, 2003, 8:13 AM

Respond to this message

Return to Index

bump n/t

by Anonymous

bump

Posted on Apr 15, 2003, 6:24 AM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


This link didn't take me there, Problem??(nt)

by Farfal

nt

Posted on Apr 15, 2003, 7:07 AM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


I checked

by Radar

The link worked for me. Occasionally I try to go and it can't find the page. Why don't you try it again?

Radar

Posted on Apr 15, 2003, 11:45 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Thanks Radar, worked this time.

by farfal

New site looks great. If I register with one email address (work) will I have a problem with signing on from elsewhere??

Posted on Apr 16, 2003, 6:56 AM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


No, the e-mail address is just for verification purposes. n/t

by Bullseye

Why are you looking here? It said "no text?"

Posted on Apr 16, 2003, 11:47 AM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Re: No, the e-mail address is just for verification purposes. n/t

by Randomluck

I always look at the NT messages. Sometimes there's a gem in there

Posted on Apr 16, 2003, 11:57 AM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Gotta click on them to turn them gray. (n/t)

by Radar

:p

Posted on Apr 16, 2003, 9:27 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Mk II Bull Barrel OD? Calipers anyone?

by jsr75

Could anyone be so kind as to measure the outer diameter (to o.o1" or 0.001") of the Mk II Bull Barrel?

Kind Regards,

-jsr75

Posted on Apr 15, 2003, 10:03 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index

.875" OD

by

As measured by my Dillion dial caliper on a stock P512.

Posted on Apr 15, 2003, 11:44 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Mine says .872" at the muzzle

by Hired Gun

.866 tight against the receiver.

Posted on Apr 16, 2003, 8:02 AM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


My Mark I is .870"...

by Bullseye

My Mark I's bull barrel is .870" down the length as measured by a Mitutoyo Dial Caliper. I suspect calibration is the reason for the deviations noted in the responses.

R,
Bullseye

Posted on Apr 16, 2003, 11:44 AM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


THANK YOU!

by jsr75

Much Thanks.

Posted on Apr 16, 2003, 2:42 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Mk I & Clark Hammer Bushing and Sear Pins?

by

Can anyone help me with advice or info on whether the Clark pins will even fit AND improve the functioning of my Mk I? I'm using the Vol. sear and trigger now.

Thanks,

Mark

Posted on Apr 15, 2003, 11:12 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index

The Answer is now posted on the new forum. n/t

by Bullseye

...

Posted on Apr 16, 2003, 11:37 AM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Tasco scope rail ?

by

I'm the proud owner of a new/used Ruger MKll stainless, bull barrel. The previous owner had a gunsmith drill,tap and install a Tasco scope rail. This rail is 13/16" wide and the mounting holes are different than my 5/8" weaver rail.
Anybody have an idea what Red Dot will fit this?

Posted on Apr 15, 2003, 4:37 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index

Our Forum League

by Radar

The other thread is getting kind of long and disorganized. I would like to start a new one and try to get a good, organized outline form going. Instead of doing one long post, I am going to do several sub-posts on different topics. Hopefully that will make it easier to find the information when I go to put things together.

Thanks,
Radar

Posted on Apr 6, 2003, 8:39 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index

Roster

by Radar

This is the roster as it stands so far. If you would like to be added or removed from this list, please reply to this message.

Radar
J-mac
Greg
Bh122lge
Fred
ElectricWrench
Ken (If we can work out details that wokr for him)

Posted on Apr 6, 2003, 8:43 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


sign me up NTF

by Terrapin Flyer (Joe Law)

NT

Posted on Apr 6, 2003, 10:47 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Will do.

by Radar

Sorry, by the time I got this far, I was kind of in a hurry. Knew you wanted in, but missed your name when I skimmed throught the old thread.

Posted on Apr 7, 2003, 1:46 AM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Jim Y wnats in. (n/t)

by Radar



Posted on Apr 7, 2003, 9:27 AM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


RJWWL wants in (n/t)

by Radar



Posted on Apr 8, 2003, 9:30 AM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Targets

by Radar

I like the idea of letting people choose the distance that they want to shoot. I can add a column indicating their shooting distance.

The targets should all be Official, or reasonable copies of official, NRA Bullseye targets.

I am having trouble finding Timed/Rapid Fire targets locally. Can someone let us know where targets can be purchased over the internet?

I have created some targets based on the official ring size and colors posted in the NRA rulebook for 50', both Slow Fire and Timed/Rapid fire. They are currently in MS Word format and fit on 8.5x11" paper. I should be able to convert them to .pdf files readable with Acrobat Reader. The only problem is that the Timed/Rapid Fire target extends to within about 1/8" inch of the edge of teh page, so a small part of the outer ring probably won't print. But for our purposes, we should be able to tell whether to score it as a 6 or a miss. I would post these files on the web site, or send by e-mail if the web site is not available in time.

I would be happy to post any targets that anybody would like to share.

Posted on Apr 6, 2003, 8:56 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Downloadable targets

by Bullseye

Here's a link to some bullseye targets for downloading.

http://www.falconmachining.com/targets/targets.htm

R,
Bullseye

Posted on Apr 6, 2003, 10:07 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


50 foot targets

by Radar

Here are the 50 Foot Slow and Timed/Rapid Fire targets that I made. The rings are all regulation NRA sized. They are available in Acrobat format and I can post them if anyone wants to use them. The Timed/Rapid fire target is just slightly too large for my printer to handle, but I think one could tell if it whether a hit towards the right or left edge should be scored as a 6 or a miss.

Radar





Posted on Apr 7, 2003, 9:52 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


50 targets

by j-mac

radar, if you would , go ahead and post them. i want to see how they print out.
thanks,
j-mac

Posted on Apr 7, 2003, 10:24 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Here are my downloadable 50 targets.

by Radar

These are 50 Foot Slow Fire and 50 Foot Timed/Rapid Fire targets I made from the official NRA specs.

Note: The Timed/Rapid fire target will probably be slightly cut off on the right and left edges depending on the capabilities of your printer.

http://www.furcweb.com/radar/files/50foottargets.pdf

Radar

Posted on Apr 7, 2003, 10:57 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


radar- targets

by j-mac

i just printed the targets, they are just fine!! hopefully, i won't have to worry about the outer ring!! "some days are diamonds and some days are stone"! something like that- i think that was john denver?
thank you!

Posted on Apr 7, 2003, 11:38 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


No Prob.

by Radar

I've got some for the longer distances that someone else made, but the only problem is that an 8.5 x 11 is not large enough for most of the target. The 50 Yard Slow fire black part barely fits on the paper.

Radar

Posted on Apr 8, 2003, 12:43 AM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Worked just fine

by Terrapin Flyer

Thanks Radar

Joe Law

Posted on Apr 12, 2003, 1:16 AM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Targets over the Net

by

Radar's targets are cost effective for sure.

If any of you want actual targets (printed on heavier paper) I have made several purchases on-line from TJ Target in Ohio (www.tjtarget.com). I can get B-16 25 yd. slow fire's for about $0.12-.13/ea., including delivery. TJ offers a pretty good selection of targets and both of my orders were shipped very promptly.

Frank

Posted on Apr 8, 2003, 11:44 AM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Web Site

by Radar

I plan to register a domain in the next week or two. And I have asked my Wife, who has two domains and has designed several web sites, to help me create a site to post information about this league.

Some of the information I plan to post includes:

Detailed list of "rules"

Roster

Scores

Any files that would be useful

Any targets or comments the shooters would like to post regarding their shooting sessions.

Most likely anything anyone else would like to suggest.

Posted on Apr 6, 2003, 9:00 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Well...

by

If people decide on the new forum, I can even make a new forum just for these shoots.

Posted on Apr 6, 2003, 9:01 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Thanks for the offer!!!

by Radar

That will be great for us to have a place to discuss our shooting without cluttering the rest of the forum up.

I would still like to create a web site to have a central location to post information, so we bon't have to wade through threads to find the information we want. Anyone disagree with this?

Radar

Posted on Apr 6, 2003, 9:22 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Radar, your missing the point

by Bullseye

The point is; you can have a separate listing forum for the postal match right on the general MKII&22/45 Forum. Rimfire Central has one going on right now their site. Check it out at the link above & just below our banner, then click "goto forums."

R,
Bullseye

Posted on Apr 6, 2003, 9:44 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


I sorta got the point...

by Radar

But I am not sure that the forum can do what I have in mind. I would really like a table where you can look at one glance and see all of the competitors and all of their scores at one glance, for instance. Does that maks sense?

Maybe I am just used to how this forum gets all cluttered and disorganized. Perhaps the new forum would be better?

I guess with our own section of the forum, you wouldn't even have to e-mail your scores to me. We could start a thread called, "Week One Scores" and everybody could post their scores in it. And we could stick a thread at the top with the rules and stuff.

What do you guys think? Should I do a web site? Should we just use the forum? I really don't mind making a site, but I will do what everyone wants.

Radar

Posted on Apr 7, 2003, 2:20 AM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Which format?

by Bh122lge

I like your idea of seeing all the scores on one organized page. It doesn't matter how this is accomplished, via a website or forum I guess. I think the ideal format would be a " chart or graph " like you have in mind, but have it so people could log on and when they post scores they would in up in the chart. Or email the scores to you, and you eneter them into the chart every week. Just my thoughts....

Posted on Apr 7, 2003, 1:06 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


radar-shooting forum

by j-mac

radar,
how about we try it on the new forum before you spend the time and effort.
- first off it will keep all of us together, when were online to discuss matches,etc.
- secondly it will give the "new veiwers" more of an incentive (so to speak) to join in. "conglomeration"
man that is a big word!! i should be in a spelling "b" what do ya think!!haha
bottom line, it will keep people from jumping back and forth. lets try it. it doesn't work or do what we need then you can exspell some of your energy?

Posted on Apr 7, 2003, 10:33 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Sounds good to me.

by Radar



Posted on Apr 7, 2003, 10:54 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


OK, I am starting to be convinced...

by Radar

I have been thinking about this all day and I think that we can make it work.

We could post the rules and sticky them at the top of the page.

Under the rules, we could perhaps sticky a topic called "Week one scores", maybe up to four posts at a time and people could post their scores as they get them. Then after the fourth week the scores could be collected and put together into some sort of easily readable format, posted and stickied to the top, right under the rules. The Weekly scores could then be allowed to sink and the next four weeks could be stickied to the top.

It would require a moderator to keep up with it. I would be willing to do that if J.Adams (I guess he is "Rook" on the new forum) didn't want to.

Is this the sort of thing you had in mind?

Radar

Posted on Apr 7, 2003, 8:08 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Yep, I'm RooK

by

It's an old internet alias I've had for a few years, use it for almost everything.

As for the Internet Postal, I was figuring on a subforum under the Ruger MKII area. Also, I can make you a moderator of that forum to keep things up, if you wish of course. I probably won't be participating for a while and I haven't got all the time in the world right now. Let me know via PM on the new boards or through email.

Posted on Apr 8, 2003, 9:37 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


new forum post idea

by j-mac

it would be great to have a froum with different links such as:
- ruger repairs, Q&A, suggestions (similar to this)
- photo gallery
- shooting format, qualifing, events, etc.
- a page for matt! discussion of whatever,however,etc.
- anything else you guys can think of?


Posted on Apr 6, 2003, 10:15 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


I can't stop laughing:) A page for Matt....

by Bh122lge

Wait let me pick myself uo off the floor....Now that's funny....lol.... I think that's the best line I've heard on this forum:)...... Matt...gotta love him though, he sure sticks to his "guns" so to speak.

Posted on Apr 6, 2003, 11:19 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Lets see

by

Those Q/A or FAQ would be easy to put in a sticky topic that hangs at the top of the page and can be edited frequently to keep it up to date. The galleries though would need to be something seperate.

Posted on Apr 7, 2003, 12:07 AM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


seperating links

by j-mac

i think that would work fine. having a seperate area with downloadable info, such as:installing new voquartzen trigger-replacing your grips, etc. that way any viewer could go to that area and scroll through and find the information needed.(like a manual- if you will)to get the information. keep the forum seperate for expert advise, suggestions, or just to talk ruger stuff!
this will give forum members more time enteract vs answering the same question every other week. i know several members are sporactic to the site- this will keep the repeated info from entering over & over!
thats my 2 cents

Posted on Apr 7, 2003, 10:48 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


FAQ and search engine

by

Well, new users will get two easy answers before repeating questions: a user made FAQ on the board and Rugers as well as advice to use the search engine first, especially now that we have one.

Posted on Apr 8, 2003, 9:32 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Timing

by Radar

I think I would like to make it a weekly event, but allow people to shoot as many target sets in advance as they like.

Twelve weeks has been suggested, and that sounds good to me.

I was thinking of startinf with the first week in May, but perhaps we could start a little earlier. The web site may not be ready by then, though. How about if we start on Monday, May 19th and have the first scores due on Monday, May 26th?

Since I will need to receive e-mails from everyone and then update my site, I would like to request that I only receive one score per week per shooter or possibly two. I would prefer not to have to post scores retroactively. Then maybe when we total and/or average our scores we could count the highest 8 or 10 scores, and that way if someone misses a week or two, those scores can just be dropped.



Posted on Apr 6, 2003, 9:10 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


timing

by

that would be fine. if you want, you can send me (by e-mail the targets you have, when you get time.
i'll look on the internet for a free downloadable rapid fire target if you want? just let me know.

Posted on Apr 6, 2003, 9:23 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Drops

by Bh122lge

That's basically how it works in a league. There is a total number of possible matches, total number of required matches, and anything over the reguired is dropped. Example = 12 total matches, top 10 matches count for final score. So in this scenario, if you only shoot 10 matches, you don't get any drops. If you shoot 11, then your lowest score does not count.

Posted on Apr 6, 2003, 11:26 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


drops

by j-mac

so i could shoot 40 matches and keep my best ten? i like it. As i mentioned under the cci minimag heading last friday i shot a 99. Thats the best one yet!! and i was sick with sinus infection!! so i need that hadicap-i don't get sick very often!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted on Apr 7, 2003, 10:54 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


That's not quite how it works.

by Radar

Before you shoot a target you decide that the next target that you shoot will be your, for example, 50 yard slow fire target for week 1. No matter how good or bad that target turns out, that is the target that you submit for your score.

You will submit 12 sets of targets, but for your final average, the lowest two or three or four or however many we dicide will be dropped.

Radar

Posted on Apr 7, 2003, 11:03 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


compehend!

by j-mac

i thoght there was a catch -to good to be true! oh well. not a problem!

Posted on Apr 7, 2003, 11:40 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


How many weeks- matches?

by Bh122lge

Just wanted to bring up another point. We could go 12 weeks, but have 24 matches. In the indoor league's I'm involved in, we shoot 2 matches a night, once a week. I would think anyone that can make it to shoot one match, could take the time to shoot two. Really it only takes 30 minutes or less to shoot 2 matches. But, on second thought maybe less matches are better so people don't get bored? It would also be more work for Radar. I don't know, just throwing idea's out there. Nice thing is, if it works out good we could always add more mathces next time.

Posted on Apr 6, 2003, 11:36 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


I replied to this post in sub point 7. (n/t)

by Radar



Posted on Apr 7, 2003, 8:18 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


matches -no problem

by j-mac

for me its no problem. i only get my gear out to "do some shooting"!! an afternoon of it (if you will). As you know i am a clean nut when it comes to my guns (and most other things) so i figure, if i'm going to spend 30-45 minutes cleaning, i'm gonna make it worth my while.

Posted on Apr 7, 2003, 11:01 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


If the new forum works out...

by Radar

I think we can "sticky", maybe four posts at the top of the League Room that J.Adams has offered to make for us. These posts would be for posting your scores. One for each of the first four weeks. At the end of the four weeks, All of the scores could be compiled into one easy to read post that can then be stickied to the top for everyone to see. Then we could start over with the next four weeks.

That would give everyone a month to shoot their four matches.

If we can do this, it would remove the necesity of my posting a web site to keep track of the league. (I am not trying to get out of it, but this way would probably be easier for everyone involved.

Radar

Posted on Apr 7, 2003, 8:33 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


12 matches

by

For this first time through let's go for a 12 match season - so that any bugs we have can be worked out. Heck, I'm not going to stop shooting after 12 weeks and will probably sign up again.

Besides, since I volunteered to be the ultimate looser I may not try to block this web site from my children if my scores are not too embarassing.

Posted on Apr 7, 2003, 10:12 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


no losers

by j-mac

sometimes it not the winning that counts!! its just having fun!!
If this is a tool i can use to spend more time with my dad, it will be the best present i can ever ask for!!

Posted on Apr 7, 2003, 11:45 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Whoa, Whoa, Whoa!!!

by Radar

I was just reviewing some of the details we worked out and realized that I made a mistake when I suggested a date. I was thinking that this was May! But it is only April!

So the date I had in mind would be more like starting on April 28th.

I apologise for the error. Everybody let me know if April 28th is OK or if you would rather start later to have more time to get ready.

Radar

Posted on Apr 8, 2003, 11:24 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Sounds good to me! nt

by Bh122lge

nt

Posted on Apr 8, 2003, 11:28 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


i'm ready

by j-mac

ready whenever the majority of you guys are! other than i'm tring to get my grass seed to germinate so i'm not walking through the mud to retrieve my targets!!

Posted on Apr 8, 2003, 11:47 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


I'm as ready as I'll ever be.

by

The 28th sounds fine to me.

Posted on Apr 14, 2003, 6:22 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Range Commands

by Radar

I don't think we need to be super regimented on this topic. People could use whatever method they are comfortable with. I tape recording would probably be ideal, but some sort of timer could probably work as well.

I tried to download the Range Commands off of http://www.bullseyepistol.com, but it seems to be a dead link.

For those of us that don't have any experience with organized shooting, can someone post a script of the commands for us to refer to. Or maybe even Make a recording that I could distribute or post?

Posted on Apr 6, 2003, 9:16 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Radar, you must have had a problem with your setup

by Bullseye

I didn't have any problems listening to the range commands from the link you provided to Bullseye Pistol.com The directions say to play it on your machine and set up a tape recorder to record the sound. Perhaps you attempted to save the digital file and that's where the problem was.

R,
Bullseye

Posted on Apr 6, 2003, 9:55 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


I clicked on the link...

by Radar

And got a page not found error. Both times I tried it. I will check it out again. Maybe there is more than one link for it? I tried on the page: http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Dreyer_infonet/ibpl.htm about three quarters of the way down the page where it says, "Download the Range Commands."

Did you get it from a different location, perhaps?

Radar

Posted on Apr 7, 2003, 1:55 AM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Maybe, But...

by Bullseye

Maybe, But I used the link you posted on the "Range Commands" message you wrote earlier, which appears to be a different link than this last one you just posted.

http://www.bullseyepistol.com/

It goes to the Bullseye Pistol main index page. Under "The Reference Room," there's a listing for "Audio Files of Range Commands" and it functions well on my computer.

I'm not sure where you picked up the link but that one is giving me the same "not found" error you saw. Why not try the other link I posted above and see if you can retrive the audio files from there.

Hope this helps!

R,
Bullseye

Posted on Apr 7, 2003, 2:01 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Yes, that worked. Thank you very much. (n/t)

by Radar



Posted on Apr 7, 2003, 7:18 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


More info

by Bh122lge

http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Dreyer_infonet/ibpl.htm
Here is a now dorment internet postal from bullseye L. Check it out for idea's. I think we have hit most of the basics.

Posted on Apr 7, 2003, 12:27 AM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Thanks

by Radar

That's is where I got the idea. I posted it in the last thread, but forgot to include it in this one.

Radar

Posted on Apr 7, 2003, 1:57 AM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


That's all I can think of for now...

by Radar

Plaese feel free to add your feedback at will. If I missed any subjects please feel free to add a subpoint to get everybody's opinion.

Thanks for advance for all of your feedback.

This is going to be great!
Radar

Posted on Apr 6, 2003, 9:19 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


How many points for each match?

by Radar

I think one "match" per week would be sufficient. But the question is, how many points should we have a match be? I would think that the answer should be either 300, 600 or 900 points.

Each set of 300 would consist of 10 shots fired at a slow fire target, 10 shots fired at a timed fire target and 10 shots fired at a rapid fire target.

Personally I am leaning towards 600.

What do you think?

Posted on Apr 7, 2003, 8:17 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


600 n/m

by

n/m

Posted on Apr 7, 2003, 10:22 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Points

by Bh122lge

Personally I like 300, but that's only because I'm used to it. (2) 300 matches are the same as (1) 600 match. The 600 is just adding the two together. So it is the same amount of shooting. Really it doesn't make any difference. Either is fine by me. I would not be able to shoot a 900 every week though. And many others may not be able to. Many leagues only shoot a 600, and you can't shoot another practice match during a match night, so a 900 would reguire (2) trips to the range a week instead of (1)for people like me. I would do a 300 or a 600.

Posted on Apr 7, 2003, 10:55 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Thanks for the insight

by Radar

Let's rule out the 900 round match then. I still am partial to a 600 round match. Does anyone want or need to make it only 300?

Radar

Posted on Apr 7, 2003, 11:06 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Distance

by KenL

I did not see this brought up. Are we settling on 50' for rapid fire and 25yrds for slow fire. I shoot inside and 25 yrd is a limit. Also, as it is my skill level drops at 25 yards as it is.

Another question about rules: 1 hand or 2 hand?

Posted on Apr 8, 2003, 10:34 AM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Either

by Bh122lge

I believe we settled on 50' or 25 and 50 yrds. Or any combination you normally shoot in a league. Since it is for fun. That way everyone can shoot what they are used too. PLEASE NOTE I don't think anyone will be allowed to shoot less than 50'. I'm sure Radar will verify this.

Posted on Apr 8, 2003, 10:52 AM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Bh122lge is correct.

by Radar

We are letting people shoot whatever distance that they like as long as they use the appropriate targets for the distance chosen.

The plan is for everyone to shoot one handed like an official bullseye shoot.

If you have any more questions, please don't hesitate to ask, it will help get us organized. I plan to have a preliminary list of rules for everyone to look at by Saturday.

Radar

Posted on Apr 8, 2003, 8:59 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


one handed !

by j-mac

is that 1 handed one a benchrest? i probobly know what your response will be! oh, darn!!!
that will definately make it more of a challange. personally, i always shoot two handed!! can i have a handicap? oh, darn!

Posted on Apr 8, 2003, 9:28 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


I always shot one handed until recently...

by Radar

I have been practicing lately. And a funny thing happened last time I went shooting. I bought some official 50 yard slow fire targets and I shot once one handed at one. I scored something like an 80 or something. Then I decided to try it with two hands. I tried it twice and couldn't break 70 points!!! Usually I am a lot better with two hands.

I don't know what the deal is for sure. The only thing I can think of is that I probably take a lot more time and concentrate harder when I hold it with one hand.

If you need any tips for shooting one handed, go to http://www.bullseyepistol.com. Scroll down to the "Perfecting Technique" heading and click on the "Army Marksmanship Training Guide."

Radar

Posted on Apr 8, 2003, 9:43 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


You got better that's what happened.

by Bh122lge

That is what should happen. When using one hand, many people don't realize there are many "negative things" that you remove from the equation. Recoil, arm movement, joint movement, all are better for "accuracy" shooting with only one hand. I can not out shoot myself with two hands. When sighting in I use a rest only to get in the ballpark, all final adjustments are made shooting one handed. Remember it's a "handgun" not a "handsgun". That's the qoute that a top bullseye shooter, told me at one of my very first trips to the range after buying my first hand gun. Been shooting one handed ever since, and loving it!

Posted on Apr 8, 2003, 11:03 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Makes sense. Hmmm... (n/t)

by Radar



Posted on Apr 9, 2003, 1:30 AM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Stuff for sale

by

i live in melbourne fl so if anyone close is interested i have some stuff for sale.Ruger mk-512 5-1/2 bull bar.,hardley used(maybe 100 rounds)with extra clips,case for gun and clips,homak locking gun cabinet,bushnell spotting scope,riffle vise,ect.....just another hobby and stuff i had to have.this stuff is really brand new!e-mail me if interested and give me your phone number and i'll call.NOT interested in shipping

Posted on Apr 14, 2003, 7:23 AM

Respond to this message

Return to Index

Spring shooting!!!

by

Got out today shooting for first time since last November. Went to a creek about 12 miles from home and found a spot that had melted off. Zeroed in my new Ultradot (took under ten shots to get it to dead center) and proceeded to stink up the place. Best I got was an 83 on a 40 foot slow fire with Federal Bulk, but at least I didn't have to squint like Clint Eastwood and contort my eyeballs like Reba MacIntyre to focus. Red dots really do feel like one is cheating. How high do my scores need to be to rated as better than stinky??

Posted on Apr 12, 2003, 9:01 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index

Just noticed all are at the new site so moved over there

by TerryMT

nt

Posted on Apr 12, 2003, 9:19 PM

Respond to this message

Return to Index


Create your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2009 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement