a beautiful set...from Tom B.

going into the Gallery this morning

http://www1.coe.neu.edu/~dan/E230/go.html
.
.
.
.

Thanks Dan and Tom.
A couple of those gals look a little long in the tooth - is that quite right?

. . . yup, something really wrong here.

(Whether it's a problem with eyesight, or evaluation of feminine features . . . at least we all now know to never, EVER rely on Dan or Tom to set up any blind dates !!!)




============


Danderoo, don't fix it too soon. It's pretty funny stuff! - Ralph

I discussed this a while back. I can't believe everyone doesn't hang on my every word.......While I cant be 100% for sure, I've collected these cards for a VERY long time. I've never seen a #1 and #2 from the girls and never seen anything higher than #1 and #2 for the indians. So......my hypothesis is that while the ACC has it listed as College Girls, #1 and #2 are, in fact, Indians. Or just really ugly chicks........