Home > Discussion Groups > 1/48 Scale

Message posting guidelines:
1.

Full real names must be used at all times.

2.
A valid e-mail address must be provided. (This is not optional)
3.
  Images must be posted at low resolution (72 dpi) and no larger than 760 pixels wide, and copyright/trade mark owners must be credited whenever reasonably possible.
4. From 20 April, registration is compulsory if you wish to post messages on the Discussion Groups. For further information, please see the following message: http://www.network54.com/Forum/message?forumid=47210&messageid=1113823253
Please read our Community guidelines before posting.
By contributing to this discussion group, you indicate your agreement to the Terms and Conditions of Use.
Posts that violate the guidelines or Terms and conditions of Use of the Missing-lynx.com discussion groups will be erased, and repeated violation of this policy may result in termination of the violator's account.

Advertisement

 Return to Index  

Chin undercut

December 28 2011 at 5:33 AM
  (Login DavidByrden)
Missing-Lynx members


Response to You need to revise your strange conclusions...

I obtained a micrometer with 0.1mm resolution to measure this feature better.

The Skybow Early kit's undercut, on the right side, is 2mm. The Tamiya Early is 2.3mm. So I was not correct to say that they are "almost the same".

But the Skybow is the correct one; indeed it is remarkably accurate.

So I don't understand your statement that it "lacks" the "correct deep undercut".

>> 32% is "Almost no difference?"

You obtained this 32% by bringing the size of the overhang into the calculation.
Since the overhang was unmentioned in any of the prior messages, I don't understand why you did that.


David



    
This message has been edited by DavidByrden on Dec 28, 2011 5:36 AM


 
 Respond to this message   


Terms and Conditions of Use
Report abuse