Back to PuttingZone
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Main  

Reeso Putter

April 27 2004 at 4:01 PM
 
from IP address 64.52.89.142

Geoff

I have not seen any reviews or forum entries regarding the Reeso putter. Having just purchased one, I hope to provide one soon.

 
 Respond to this message   
AuthorReply


172.134.187.242

Excellent! Please Do

April 28 2004, 7:33 AM 

I'd love to see what comments you have about the Reeso putter and its various features and performance characteristics. Thanks!

Cheers!

Geoff Mangum
Putting Theorist and Instructor

Geoff Mangum's PuttingZone

Golf's most advanced and comprehensive putting instruction.

Over 655,000 visits and growing strong ...

518 Woodlawn Ave
Greensboro NC 27401
336.230.0612 home
336.402.1602 cell




    
This message has been edited by aceputt from IP address 172.138.169.48 on Jul 13, 2004 10:34 AM


 
 Respond to this message   


24.9.236.169

Reeso

July 8 2004, 3:15 AM 

The Reeso putter is not included in your review list, the link you have is set to goto (resso.com) one too many s's one more e.

I think the key for me to putt well is to be in tune with gravity and the weight of the ball. I usually envision the ball leaving the putter and rolling at the speed I think is needed for the distance and following the line I have determined to be the correct one.

I have been researching putters for a while and was thinking of getting the Reeso.

 
 Respond to this message   


24.9.236.169

review

July 8 2004, 3:20 AM 

Where is the review you stated you would have? I am thinking of getting one but I want to get more info from the company. Has your putting improved as the site boasts it would?

 
 Respond to this message   


172.138.169.48

Reeso Putter is a Good One

July 13 2004, 11:34 AM 

Dear Mark,

Please excuse the delay -- I was in Ireland and had to take some time working out with the Reeso putter after returning.





My basic opinion of the Reeso putter is pretty positive. I like and appreciate the many design features incorporated into this putter, including those listed in the Table on the Reeso website comparing the Reeso with the Futura, Bobby Grace, Odyssey, and Bettinardi putters:

Center-shafted
Straight Shaft
Face balanced
Heel-Toe balanced
High Weight (580 grams vs. 510-520 for others)
High Swing Weight (H-5 vs D-5 to D-6 for others)
High % Back Weight
High Moment Of Inertia

The Futura and Odyssey putters come off worst in this comparison.

I like the high-contrast red-orange color and the sense of aiming assistance I get from the two parallel rods around the central brass-colored rod. I like the semi-circular shape of the brass-colored weight at the back that is partly half a ball in shape and half a putting cup in shape and size. I like the broad flat base the soles the putter perfectly. I like the clean lines of the slab that serves as the putter face. I like the heavier weighting of the putter head. I like the balancing.

My only caveat is that I'm personally not too fond of the shaft hoseling being back off the putter face with a gap between the front end of the center rod where the shaft attaches and the back of the putter face slab of about 1/2 an inch. The thickness of the face slab means that the shaft is back from the striking face of the putter by about 1 inch.

The website describes this feature as the key innovation:

"With the REESO™ Putter you don't have to be concerned with "releasing" the putter head [to keep the face moving square thru impact] because it happens naturally due to the unique design.

It is easier to keep an item on line if it is moved forward with one continuous motion rather than with a forced release motion that must change right at the critical point of impact with the ball.

The "One Continuous Motion Putting Stroke" with the REESO Putter™ is possible due to the rear mounted center shaft and the back weight distribution. The face balanced putter will stay square to the hole before, during and after impact because its special weighting and balance will let it release itself."


To me, it is a little discomfiting to see a gap between the hosel and the putter face slab, even though the parallel red rods connect the face to the back and the center rod is connected to the back as well. It just makes me wonder whether there is a difference between hitting with the putter face and swinging the hosel. I prefer my attention on the putter face untroubled by such an issue. I suppose I can get over this, and also I doubt that many others would have this experience. Even so, the other thing about this design feature is how it plays when I time the transition of the stroke from down to the bottom to up into the ball. I have spent a lot of time timing the transition with the front edge of the face right at the bottom of the stroke, and the hosel with most putters is either right there also or very near behind, so the shaft of the putter straightens to vertical right when the shoulders level and the putter face reaches the bottom. With the Reeso putter, the front edge or face of the slab reaches the bottom before the shaft straightens to vertical and the hosel comes along behind. This creates a choice of whether to time the upstroke with the putter face or with the hosel and the shaft. I'm sure this issue will dissipate with time, but currently it bothers my stroke. In this respect, it is the same as with a Futura putter, so it is probably me and my style rather than the putter that is the problem.

I'm not sure what people mean when they say "release" the putter. Tiger Wood talks about the putter head going ahead of the handle thru impact. Well, crickey, it always does that unless you're a contortionist. To me, it is more a matter of keeping the pivot securely in place, returning the shaft to vertical, and transitioning up into the back of the ball with the putter face. So hoseling and ball placement and putter-face-to-hosel arrangement are issues.

That said, I still like the Reeso putter because it gets a lot right. It could use a sweetspot marker on top of the putter face slab -- perhaps a line or triangle pointing into the back of the ball.

Cheers!

Geoff Mangum
Putting Theorist and Instructor

Geoff Mangum's PuttingZone

Golf's most advanced and comprehensive putting instruction.

Over 720,000 visits and growing strong ...

518 Woodlawn Ave
Greensboro NC 27401
336.230.0612 home
336.402.1602 cell





 
 Respond to this message   


64.52.89.142

Reeso Putter

July 28 2004, 9:01 PM 

Geoff

Just read your review. The gap between the striking area and the shaft does not bother me at all. In fact, I never really thought much about it expect that I found that the center shafting, being back from the face, allowed me a full view of the club head, which I like.

I do agree that a sweet spot marker is a good idea. I put one on mine with a Sharpee. I have also made this suggestion to Sandy in the past.

Cheers.

 
 Respond to this message   


64.52.89.142

Reeso Putter

July 28 2004, 8:54 PM 

Well, I have now had my Reeso Putter for over a month, and I will not be taking it out of my bag. The first time I used it I had under 30 putts on a course I had never played before, and then 27 putts the next day on my home course. I've been putting so well with the Reeso that one other player in my regular group now owns a Reeso and swears by it. Two other guys love the putter, but refuse to switch - their mistake.

This is a must have putter, and believe me, I know. I have many Bettinardi's, as well as Pings, B. Grace and a host of other putters, may of which I really like, but the Reeso is a keeper.

The balance on the putter, and the weight, almost force you to follow through down the target line. You may get some razzing about the looks (I actually painted mine, no offense Sandy) but I will trade looks for results any day.

In case anyone is wondering, I am a 4 handicap. If this putter helps me, it is sure to help higher handicap golfers.

 
 Respond to this message   
Current Topic - Reeso Putter
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Main  
Back to PuttingZone